Italy - Serie AData current as of 12 September 2026

Pisa vs Napoli: match statistics

Pisa crest
Pisa
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Napoli crest
Napoli

Pisa vs Napoli: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pisa played Napoli in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Pisa: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Napoli: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pisa scores 0.69 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Napoli scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pisa 42%, Napoli 50%. Over 2.5: Pisa 50%, Napoli 53%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Napoli has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.09. Pisa: 9.8 shots per match, Napoli: 13.3.

Match halves

Pisa: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.39. Napoli: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Pisa: 46-60 (6 goals). Napoli: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a Napoli win (2) — visitors sit 2nd in the table while Pisa are 20th. Pisa have lost 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring only 2 goals and conceding 11, whereas Napoli have scored 7 in their last 5 (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses) and conceded 6. Offensively Napoli hold a clear advantage: 54 goals scored this season versus Pisa’s 25, averaging 1.22 goals away compared to Pisa’s 0.5 at home, and Napoli’s xG is 1.46 versus 1.20 for Pisa. Napoli also register more shots and shots on target (avg 12.72 shots and 4.17 on target per away game vs 10.56 and 3.17 for Pisa), enjoy 58% possession vs 43% and have a higher conversion rate (10% vs 5%). Defensively Pisa have conceded 66 goals this season and 1.28 per home match, while Napoli have conceded 36 and 1.00 away, therefore I assign 6% to the hosts, 16% to a draw and 78% to a Napoli victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis favors a Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) scenario. Pisa has a seasonal BTTS rate of 61% and 67% of home matches exceed 2.5 goals, while conceding 66 goals this season and 11 in the last 5 matches (avg. 2.2 per match), indicating defensive vulnerability. Napoli have scored 54 goals this season and 7 in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match), and xG shows 1.61 for Pisa vs 1.46 for Napoli with 5.17 and 4.17 shots on target respectively, so both teams create chances. The counterargument is Napoli’s higher clean sheet expected rate at 39% vs Pisa’s 33% and Napoli’s seasonal BTTS at 39% (last 5 matches BTTS 40% for both), but Pisa’s defensive weakness combined with Napoli’s offensive effectiveness provides a stronger signal for BTTS. I assess BTTS probability at 63% vs 37% No BTTS and therefore select the tip: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

After combining both teams' xG (Pisa xG 1.61, Napoli xG 1.46) and xG against (both 1.12) we obtain expected goals of 1.37 for Pisa and 1.29 for Napoli, totaling 2.66 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.66 yields probabilities of Over 1.5 at about 75%, Over 2.5 ~50% and Over 3.5 ~28%, which I reflect as percentages. Seasonal data support Over 1.5: Pisa has 72% of home matches above 1.5, Napoli 67% away, and both teams record Over 0.5 in 89% and 94% of cases, reducing the risk of a low-scoring affair. Additionally, Pisa has conceded 66 goals this season while Napoli scored 54, increasing the likelihood of goals and making Over 1.5 the safest line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I predict a draw at half-time and a Napoli victory at full-time (X/2). Both teams have almost identical average goals by half-time — 0.78 each — and similar xG: Pisa 1.61 versus Napoli 1.46; the average shots on target are also comparable (5.17 vs 4.17), which favors an even first half. Napoli, however, has a better half-time record: 32 points and an average of 1.78 points at the break compared to Pisa’s 29 points and 1.61 on average, indicating the visitors’ potential to take the initiative. In the last five matches the contrast is clear — Pisa’s form is ‘lllll’ with an average of 0.4 goals per game, while Napoli averages 1.4 goals over the last five and achieves 1.6 average points in second halves versus 0.0 for Pisa, so I expect a turnaround after half-time in favor of the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

24Possession (%)76
PisaNapoli
4Shots10
PisaNapoli
2Shots on target5
PisaNapoli
0.52xG1.34
PisaNapoli
1Corners6
PisaNapoli
17Dangerous attacks47
PisaNapoli
13Fouls8
PisaNapoli
2Cards2
PisaNapoli

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.69Goals scored / match1.5
PisaNapoli
1.83Goals conceded / match1
PisaNapoli
40%Average possession58%
PisaNapoli
2.83Shots on target / match4.67
PisaNapoli

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.78Shots per match13.28
PisaNapoli
2.83Shots on target4.67
PisaNapoli
7.1%Shot conversion11.3%
PisaNapoli
40%Possession58%
PisaNapoli
1.09xG for1.53
PisaNapoli
1.61xG against1.12
PisaNapoli

Shooting quality

Pisa: BalancedNapoli: Balanced
PisaNapoli
Accuracy (shots on target)29%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pisa
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
6% W33% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-12-22
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-12
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Napoli
DLWDL
Season result split
58% W19% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
21-7-8
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-3-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Napoli is 117% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - Pisa · 1.5 goals / match - Napoli

Napoli is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - Pisa · 1 goals / match - Napoli

Pisa scoring profile: mixed

Pisa scores in 44% of matches (16 of 36 matches), while Napoli keeps a clean sheet in 36% (13 of 36 matches).

Napoli scoring profile: very strong

Napoli scores in 78% of matches (28 of 36 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 36 matches).

25Goals scored (season)54
PisaNapoli
66Goals conceded (season)36
PisaNapoli
2.53Average goals in match2.5
PisaNapoli
2Goals scored (last 5)7
PisaNapoli
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
PisaNapoli

How often they score at least...

44%1 goal78%
PisaNapoli
22%2 goals53%
PisaNapoli
3%3 goals17%
PisaNapoli
0%4 goals3%
PisaNapoli

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal64%
PisaNapoli
53%2 goals31%
PisaNapoli
25%3 goals6%
PisaNapoli
11%4 goals0%
PisaNapoli

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time11%
PisaNapoli
3%BTTS in both halves11%
PisaNapoli
11%Scored in both halves36%
PisaNapoli

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
PisaNapoli
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
PisaNapoli
40%BTTS - last 540%
PisaNapoli

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
PisaNapoli
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
PisaNapoli
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
PisaNapoli

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
PisaNapoli
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
PisaNapoli
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
PisaNapoli

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Napoli is 109% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.81 pts / match - Pisa · 1.69 pts / match - Napoli

Pisa - half-time state
8% leading56% draw36% trailing
Napoli - half-time state
47% leading28% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.81Points per match (1st half)1.69
PisaNapoli
0.31Goals scored (1st half)0.78
PisaNapoli
0.72Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
PisaNapoli
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.19
PisaNapoli
53%Clean sheet before half-time67%
PisaNapoli
75%No goal before half-time44%
PisaNapoli

After half-time (2nd half)

0.72Points per match (2nd half)1.44
PisaNapoli
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
PisaNapoli
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
PisaNapoli
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.31
PisaNapoli
31%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PisaNapoli
69%No goal after half-time42%
PisaNapoli

Pisa - second-half results

11% W39% D50% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-26
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Napoli - second-half results

31% W53% D17% L
61
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pisa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Napoli - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
15
31-45
6
11
46-60
3
11
61-75
5
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

Napoli
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
6
3
16-30
11
4
31-45
11
8
46-60
6
6
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+99%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
162%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Napoli

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

PisaLigaNapoli
Average goals in match 2.532.42 2.50
Both teams scored 42%45% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%46% 53%
Clean sheets 14%33% 36%
Goal before half-time 56%65% 78%
Goal after half-time 75%77% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NapoliGoalAmir RrahmaniAssist: Eljif Elmas
  2. NapoliYellow cardEljif Elmas
  3. PisaYellow cardArturo Calabresi
  4. PisaSubstitutionOn: İsak VuralOff: Stefano Moreo
  5. NapoliYellow cardAlisson de Almeida Santos
  6. NapoliSubstitutionOn: Antonio VergaraOff: Alisson de Almeida Santos
  7. NapoliSubstitutionOn: Pasquale MazzocchiOff: Giovanni Di Lorenzo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Francesco FourneauMatches officiated: 11
4.09Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 255%Home wins18%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pisa 0 - 0 - 1 Napoli. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

SSC Napoli
3 : 2
AC Pisa 1909

FAQ

What was the result of Pisa vs Napoli?

The Serie A match finished Pisa 0:3 Napoli. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pisa vs Napoli?

Pisa score 0.69 goals per game on average and Napoli 1.50. The Serie A average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Pisa's matches and 50% of Napoli's.

What form are Pisa and Napoli in?

Over the last 5 games Pisa have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Napoli 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pisa vs Napoli?

The statistical background for Pisa vs Napoli — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.