Pisa vs Parma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pisa played Parma in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 8 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Pisa: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Parma: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pisa scores 0.77 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Parma scores 0.69 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.35 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pisa 38%, Parma 46%. Over 2.5: Pisa 38%, Parma 38%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Parma has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.02. Pisa: 9.8 shots per match, Parma: 10.9.

Match halves

Pisa: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.46. Parma: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Pisa: 76-90+ (3 goals). Parma: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.35 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
PisaParma
14Shots9
PisaParma
2Shots on target2
PisaParma
1.49xG0.84
PisaParma
6Corners0
PisaParma
63Dangerous attacks17
PisaParma
15Fouls7
PisaParma
4Cards2
PisaParma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.77Goals scored / match0.69
PisaParma
1.38Goals conceded / match1.31
PisaParma
39%Average possession42%
PisaParma
2.46Shots on target / match3
PisaParma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.77Shots per match10.92
PisaParma
2.46Shots on target3
PisaParma
7.9%Shot conversion6.3%
PisaParma
39%Possession42%
PisaParma
1.02xG for1.18
PisaParma
1.74xG against1.49
PisaParma

Shooting quality

Pisa: BalancedParma: Balanced
PisaParma
Accuracy (shots on target)25%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pisa is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Pisa · 0.8 pts / match - Parma

Pisa
DDWDL
Season result split
8% W54% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-7-5
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Parma
LLDWL
Season result split
15% W38% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-6
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pisa is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

0.77 goals / match - Pisa · 0.69 goals / match - Parma

Parma is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Pisa · 1.31 goals / match - Parma

Pisa scoring profile: mixed

Pisa scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Parma keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Parma scoring profile: mixed

Parma scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

10Goals scored (season)9
PisaParma
18Goals conceded (season)17
PisaParma
2.15Average goals in match2
PisaParma
5Goals scored (last 5)6
PisaParma
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
PisaParma

How often they score at least...

46%1 goal46%
PisaParma
31%2 goals23%
PisaParma
0%3 goals0%
PisaParma
0%4 goals0%
PisaParma

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal77%
PisaParma
46%2 goals46%
PisaParma
15%3 goals8%
PisaParma
8%4 goals0%
PisaParma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time15%
PisaParma
8%BTTS in both halves0%
PisaParma
8%Scored in both halves23%
PisaParma

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
PisaParma
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PisaParma
40%BTTS - last 580%
PisaParma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
PisaParma
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
PisaParma
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
PisaParma

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
PisaParma
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
PisaParma
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
PisaParma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Parma is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Pisa · 1 pts / match - Parma

Pisa - half-time state
8% leading62% draw31% trailing
Parma - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1
PisaParma
0.31Goals scored (1st half)0.31
PisaParma
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
PisaParma
1Average goals (1st half)0.77
PisaParma
54%Clean sheet before half-time62%
PisaParma
77%No goal before half-time69%
PisaParma

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.77
PisaParma
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
PisaParma
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
PisaParma
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.23
PisaParma
46%Clean sheet after half-time38%
PisaParma
69%No goal after half-time62%
PisaParma

Pisa - second-half results

15% W54% D31% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Parma - second-half results

8% W54% D38% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pisa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Parma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Parma
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
21%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
29%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Parma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

PisaLigaParma
Average goals in match 2.152.35 2.00
Both teams scored 38%47% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%44% 38%
Clean sheets 31%32% 23%
Goal before half-time 54%65% 54%
Goal after half-time 62%73% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.35
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ParmaYellow cardAdrian Dawid Benedyczak
  2. ParmaYellow cardEmanuele Valeri
  3. ParmaSubstitutionOn: Oliver Sørensen JensenOff: Jacob Ondrejka
  4. PisaYellow cardMichel Aebischer
  5. PisaYellow cardIdrissa Touré
  6. PisaSubstitutionOn: Mattéo TramoniOff: Henrik Wendel Meister
  7. PisaRed cardM'Bala Nzola

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Daniele DoveriMatches officiated: 17
3.59Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 228%Home wins24%Draws47%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Pisa vs Parma?

The Serie A match finished Pisa 0:1 Parma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pisa vs Parma?

Pisa score 0.77 goals per game on average and Parma 0.69. The Serie A average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Pisa's matches and 46% of Parma's.

What form are Pisa and Parma in?

Over the last 5 games Pisa have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Parma 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pisa vs Parma?

The statistical background for Pisa vs Parma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.