Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Loudoun United: match statistics
Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Loudoun United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pittsburgh Riverhounds played Loudoun United in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Highmark Stadium. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Loudoun United: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.13 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Loudoun United scores 1.18 and concedes 1.77. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 42%, Loudoun United 59%. Over 2.5: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 42%, Loudoun United 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Loudoun United has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.17. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 8.9 shots per match, Loudoun United: 12.2.
Match halves
Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.67. Loudoun United: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (8 goals). Loudoun United: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 3.20, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pittsburgh Riverhounds sit higher in the table and have collected 8 points from their last five matches, thanks to 2 wins and 2 draws, while Loudoun United have failed to win any of their five games and have managed just 2 points. At home, the hosts win 50% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.17 goals and conceding just 0.83, whereas the visitors score only 0.78 goals away from home and concede 1.78. Pittsburgh’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.27, while Loudoun allow opponents an away xG of 1.92. The hosts’ defense has also improved during the current run, conceding 5 goals in their last five matches, compared with 10 goals allowed by Loudoun over the same period. A draw remains a realistic possibility given Loudoun’s 33% away draw rate, but the numbers point more clearly to a controlled home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is slightly favored, as both teams have recorded this outcome frequently during the season: Pittsburgh in 62% of matches and Loudoun in 56%, compared with the league average of 54%. The hosts score an average of 1.46 goals and generate 1.61 xG, while Loudoun’s defense allows as many as 1.78 goals and 1.92 xG per match. Loudoun score only 0.78 goals on average, but Pittsburgh concede 1.77 goals per game, and the visitors have produced a high 1.72 xG across their last five matches. Recent form also supports goals at both ends: Loudoun have conceded 10 goals in five matches, or 2.0 per game, while Pittsburgh have scored 7 goals during that period. The main risk to the pick is Loudoun’s 44% clean-sheet rate and their weaker finishing, but the hosts’ attacking advantage and the vulnerability of both defenses point toward a Goal/Goal outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Pittsburgh provides a solid goalscoring foundation, averaging 1.46 goals with an xG of 1.61, while Loudoun concede as many as 1.78 goals away from home and allow opponents an xG of 1.92. The visitors score only 0.78 goals per match, but the home side’s defense allows opponents 1.77 goals, raising their projection to around 1.10 goals. Loudoun have conceded 10 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.0 per game, while Pittsburgh matches went Over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases. The Over 1.5 goals line offers the greatest edge: it was covered in 69% of the home side’s matches this season and 56% of the visitors’ matches, while the combined projection of 2.72 goals clearly supports at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time, as Pittsburgh were level after 45 minutes in 69% of their matches, rising to 75% across their last five games. Loudoun also tend to start cautiously: they were level at half-time in 80% of their last five appearances, while their average first-half goal output is just 0.4. After the break, the advantage should shift towards the hosts, who have averaged 0.75 goals scored and 0.5 conceded over their last five matches, compared with 1.2 goals conceded by the visitors. Pittsburgh are also in better current form, having won 40% of their last five games compared with 0% for Loudoun, and their xG of 1.61 is higher than the visitors’ 1.23. In addition, the visitors’ defence allows an average xG of 1.92, which, following an even first half, increases the likelihood of the hosts deciding the match after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pittsburgh Riverhounds | Loudoun United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 0.4 pts / match - Loudoun United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.77 goals / match - Loudoun United
Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Loudoun United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
Loudoun United scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Over / Under - Loudoun United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 0.86 pts / match - Loudoun United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Loudoun United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Loudoun United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Pittsburgh Riverhounds | Liga | Loudoun United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.17 | 2.71 | ▲ 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 64% | • 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 79% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2 - 2 - 1 Loudoun United. Average goals 3.20, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Loudoun United?
The USL Championship match finished Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1:0 Loudoun United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Loudoun United?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 2, Loudoun United won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Loudoun United?
Pittsburgh Riverhounds score 1.13 goals per game on average and Loudoun United 1.18. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's matches and 59% of Loudoun United's.
What form are Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Loudoun United in?
Over the last 5 games Pittsburgh Riverhounds have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Loudoun United 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Loudoun United?
The statistical background for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Loudoun United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


