United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Phoenix Rising: match statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Phoenix Rising: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pittsburgh Riverhounds played Phoenix Rising in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Phoenix Rising: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.43 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Phoenix Rising scores 1.57 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 71%, Phoenix Rising 57%. Over 2.5: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 71%, Phoenix Rising 57%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Phoenix Rising has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.24. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.3 shots per match, Phoenix Rising: 10.7.

Match halves

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86. Phoenix Rising: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 0-15 (2 goals). Phoenix Rising: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pittsburgh Riverhounds appear to be favorites: at home they average 2.5 goals per game, 10 shots and 3.5 shots on target with a 25% conversion and 0% shutouts, while Phoenix averages 1.25 goals on the road with only a 12% conversion and 25% of away matches without a goal. Phoenix has higher possession (50% vs 36%) but it doesn’t translate into efficiency — both teams average 3.5 shots on target per game, yet the home side finishes better. From an xG perspective the home team posts average xG 1.18 versus 1.27 for the visitors, however Pittsburgh overperforms its xG at home by scoring 2.5 goals, indicating clinical finishing. Defensively Phoenix is slightly better away (conceding 1.25 vs Pittsburgh’s 1.5 conceded at home), but the visitors have a 50% away loss rate and only 25% away wins, whereas the hosts have a 100% home win rate in the sample and a +2 home goal differential. Based on these figures I expect a home win; I estimate roughly 60% chance for Pittsburgh, 20% draw and 20% for Phoenix.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The forecast leans toward BTTS - Yes: I assess BTTS at 62% versus 38% for No Goal. Pittsburgh has a season BTTS rate of 67% and averages 2.0 goals per game with xG 1.47, while Phoenix has a season BTTS of 50% and concedes 1.25 goals on average — the 2.0 vs 1.25 relationship favors a Goal/Goal scenario. Phoenix scores 1.25 goals on average with xG 1.27, and Pittsburgh concedes 1.0 goal (xG against Pittsburgh 1.21), indicating the visitors also have a realistic chance to score. Additionally, 6.0 vs 3.5 shots on target, conversion rates of 18% vs 12%, and relatively low clean sheet percentages of 33% and 25% support goals at both ends. The counterargument is Phoenix’s 0% BTTS in their last 5 matches, which weakens the signal; therefore I give a moderate lean to Yes rather than a very strong one.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG and defensive data I expect around 2.62 goals: home xG 1.47 and away xG 1.27, with xG conceded 1.21 (home) and 1.28 (away), which after averaging yields 1.38 for Pittsburgh and 1.24 for Phoenix (total 2.62). Pittsburgh scores 2.0 goals per game this season and records 6.0 on-target shots per match, while Phoenix has 1.25 goals and 3.5 on-target shots, indicating a clear offensive edge for the home side. Both teams frequently feature in goal-scoring matches: the home team has BTTS in 67% of games, the away team in 50%, and >1.5 goals has been exceeded in 100% of matches this season for both teams, so I rate Over 1.5 highly (93%). For the 2.5 line seasonal rates are 67% (home) and 50% (away) over 2.5, and the 2.62 forecast gives a moderate edge to Over (58%); Over 3.5 is unlikely (33% for home, 0% for away), hence only an 18% chance.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/X (home team leads at half-time, draw at full-time). The hosts led at the break in 2 of 3 home matches (67%) and score an average of 0.67 goals in the first half versus 0.25 for Phoenix, giving them the advantage at half-time. However, over the full 90 minutes the hosts drew 2 of 3 home games (67%) and have only a 33% win rate at the stadium, so it is more probable that the half-time lead will be lost in favor of a draw than held until the end. Additionally, Riverhounds have a higher xG (1.47 vs 1.27) and more on-target shots on average (6.0 vs 3.5), while the visitors concede 1.25 goals per game on average, which facilitates an equalizer in the second half. For these reasons, a home lead at half-time and draw at full-time is the strongest signal available from the data.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
9Shots8
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
2Shots on target1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0.98xG0.83
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
2Corners3
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
37Dangerous attacks34
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
14Fouls15
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1Cards2
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1.43Goals scored / match1.57
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1.71Goals conceded / match1.14
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
51%Average possession48%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
3.71Shots on target / match4.57
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.29Shots per match10.71
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
3.71Shots on target4.57
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
15.4%Shot conversion14.7%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
51%Possession48%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1.24xG for1.36
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1.34xG against1.25
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

Shooting quality

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishingPhoenix Rising: Efficient finishing
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
Accuracy (shots on target)40%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Phoenix Rising is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.6 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
LWDLW
Season result split
43% W14% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-3
1.43 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Phoenix Rising
DDLWW
Season result split
29% W43% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-2
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Phoenix Rising is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.57 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Phoenix Rising is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.14 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Phoenix Rising scoring profile: very strong

Phoenix Rising scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).

10Goals scored (season)11
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
12Goals conceded (season)8
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
3.14Average goals in match2.71
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
43%2 goals43%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
29%3 goals29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0%4 goals0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal71%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
57%2 goals43%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
14%3 goals0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0%4 goals0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

71%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 7 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
14%BTTS in both halves0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
43%Scored in both halves29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
60%BTTS - last 540%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Phoenix Rising is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.43 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
29% leading14% draw57% trailing
Phoenix Rising - half-time state
43% leading14% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.43
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.14
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
29%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
57%No goal before half-time57%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.71
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
1.86Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
29%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising
29%No goal after half-time29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPhoenix Rising

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Phoenix Rising - second-half results

43% W43% R14% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Phoenix Rising - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Phoenix Rising
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Phoenix Rising

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLigaPhoenix Rising
Average goals in match 3.142.65 2.71
Both teams scored 71%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%52% 57%
Clean sheets 0%29% 29%
Goal before half-time 100%65% 86%
Goal after half-time 86%80% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardAlbert Dikwa Lega
  2. Phoenix RisingYellow cardJean Eric Moursou
  3. Phoenix RisingGoalIhsan Nino SackoAssist: Gunnar Studenthofft
  4. Phoenix RisingSubstitutionOn: Eziah RamirezOff: Ihsan Nino Sacko
  5. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Charles AhlOff: Jackson Walti
  6. Phoenix RisingYellow cardCharlie Dennis
  7. Phoenix RisingSubstitutionOn: Jackson GaydonOff: Hope Avayevu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1 - 1 - 0 Phoenix Rising. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
0 : 0
Phoenix Rising FC
Phoenix Rising
1 : 3
Pittsburgh Riverhounds

FAQ

What was the result of Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Phoenix Rising?

The USL Championship match finished Pittsburgh Riverhounds 0:1 Phoenix Rising. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Phoenix Rising?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 1, Phoenix Rising won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Phoenix Rising?

Pittsburgh Riverhounds score 1.43 goals per game on average and Phoenix Rising 1.57. The USL Championship average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's matches and 57% of Phoenix Rising's.

What form are Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Phoenix Rising in?

Over the last 5 games Pittsburgh Riverhounds have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Phoenix Rising 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Phoenix Rising?

The statistical background for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Phoenix Rising — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.