United States - USL ChampionshipHighmark StadiumData current as of 23 October 2026

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: match statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pittsburgh Riverhounds played Tampa Bay Rowdies in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Highmark Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.14 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.81 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 41%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 43%. Over 2.5: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 41%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 43%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.18. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 8.9 shots per match, Tampa Bay Rowdies: 15.4.

Match halves

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.05.

Goals by minute

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (8 goals). Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tampa Bay Rowdies are top of the away standings and have won 64% of their matches on the road, while Pittsburgh win 55% of their home fixtures. The visitors boast a clearly more reliable defensive record: they concede just 0.55 goals per away match on average and keep a clean sheet in 55% of those games, compared with Pittsburgh’s 0.91 goals conceded and 27% clean-sheet rate at home. Rowdies score an average of 1.45 goals away from home with an xG of 1.48, while Pittsburgh fail to score in as many as 45% of their home matches; by comparison, the visitors draw a blank in only 9% of away fixtures. Both teams have collected 10 points from their last five matches, but Tampa Bay have scored 10 goals in that period—twice as many as Riverhounds’ 5. Pittsburgh may be able to limit the margin of defeat after conceding just 2 goals in their last five games, but the away record and greater consistency of Rowdies point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams have scored in just 20% of their last five matches, well below the league average of 53%. During this period, Pittsburgh averaged only 1.0 goal per game and scored 5 goals in total, while Tampa conceded just 1.0 goal per match. The visitors’ defense has been particularly solid throughout the season, allowing 0.55 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 55% of their appearances. Tampa does have offensive potential, averaging 2.0 goals over their last five matches and recording an xG of 1.54, but Pittsburgh conceded only 0.4 goals per game during this period. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Tampa Bay has a very solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.55 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 55% of games, which limits the hosts’ attacking potential despite their season xG of 2.00. Pittsburgh has scored only 1.0 goal per game over its last five matches, with Over 2.5 goals landing in just 20% of cases. The home side is also in strong defensive form, conceding just 0.4 goals per match over the same sample, while both teams scored in only 20% of its games. Tampa Bay has recently averaged 2.0 goals per match, but its away profile is notably more cautious: 82% of matches finished below 2.5 goals, and as many as 91% stayed below 3.5 goals. The projected total of 2.17 goals points to a strong preference for Under 3.5 goals, supported by both the visitors’ defensive strength and the low-scoring nature of Pittsburgh’s recent matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Tampa Bay Rowdies win is the most likely outcome, as the visitors have kept a clean sheet before the break in 82% of matches and concede just 0.18 goals per game during this period. In their last five matches, Pittsburgh have scored only 0.6 goals before half-time, compared with just 0.2 for Tampa, further supporting the scenario of a cautious start. After the break, the Rowdies clearly step up the pace: in their last five appearances, they have averaged 1.8 goals in the second half, compared with 0.4 for Pittsburgh. The visitors also have the stronger overall season record, winning 64% of their matches compared with 60% for the hosts and losing only 9% of their games. Pittsburgh’s strength in chance creation is evident, as they average 18.3 shots and have an xG of 2.00, but Tampa’s defensive solidity, highlighted by an average of just 0.55 goals conceded, points to an away win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
9Shots13
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0Shots on target2
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0.92xG1.43
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
2Corners5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
48Dangerous attacks65
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
16Fouls15
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
3Cards1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
1.14Goals scored / match1.81
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
1.05Goals conceded / match0.95
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
46%Average possession53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
3.41Shots on target / match4.76
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.91Shots per match15.43
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
3.41Shots on target4.76
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
12.8%Shot conversion11.7%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
46%Possession53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
1.18xG for1.73
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
1.26xG against1.13
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

Shooting quality

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: Counter-attackingTampa Bay Rowdies: Attacking
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
Accuracy (shots on target)38%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 2.4 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDWWL
Season result split
45% W14% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-9
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tampa Bay Rowdies
WWWWL
Season result split
62% W24% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-3
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.14 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.81 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 0.95 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: mixed

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

Tampa Bay Rowdies scoring profile: very strong

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

25Goals scored (season)38
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
23Goals conceded (season)20
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
2.18Average goals in match2.76
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
6Goals scored (last 5)13
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal90%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
32%2 goals52%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
18%3 goals29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0%4 goals5%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal52%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
32%2 goals24%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
5%3 goals10%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0%4 goals10%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 22 matches
43%
Tampa Bay Rowdies - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 21 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time10%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
23%Scored in both halves24%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
40%BTTS - last 540%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.86 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading50% draw23% trailing
Tampa Bay Rowdies - half-time state
52% leading29% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.86
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.76
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0.73Average goals (1st half)1.24
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
68%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
68%No goal before half-time48%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)1.05
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.52
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
50%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies
45%No goal after half-time38%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsTampa Bay Rowdies

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

36% W32% D32% L
29
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results

43% W38% D19% L
39
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tampa Bay Rowdies - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.62.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
0
2
31-45
8
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
7
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
14
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Tampa Bay Rowdies

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLigaTampa Bay Rowdies
Average goals in match▼ 2.182.70• 2.76
Both teams scored▼ 41%53%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 41%49%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 32%28%▲ 48%
Goal before half-time▼ 55%64%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 77%79%▼ 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardMax Schneider
  2. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Pedro DolabellaOff: Marco Micaletto
  3. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardTrevor Amann
  4. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Yu TsukanomeOff: Samuel Bassett
  5. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardEliot Goldthorp
  6. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardCharles Ahl
  7. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Brunallergene EtouOff: Eliot Goldthorp

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1 - 1 - 3 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
3 : 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Tampa Bay Rowdies
2 : 1
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
2 : 1
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
0 : 0
Tampa Bay Rowdies

FAQ

What was the result of Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

The USL Championship match finished Pittsburgh Riverhounds 0:0 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Tampa Bay Rowdies?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 1, Tampa Bay Rowdies won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

Pittsburgh Riverhounds score 1.14 goals per game on average and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1.81. The USL Championship average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's matches and 43% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's.

What form are Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Tampa Bay Rowdies in?

Over the last 5 games Pittsburgh Riverhounds have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tampa Bay Rowdies 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.