PK-35 vs JIPPO: match statistics
PK-35 vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PK-35 played JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
PK-35: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
PK-35 scores 1.67 and concedes 0.53 goals per match. JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PK-35 33%, JIPPO 47%. Over 2.5: PK-35 40%, JIPPO 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
JIPPO has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.45. PK-35: 11.7 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.6.
Match halves
PK-35: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.13. JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
PK-35: 46-60 (9 goals). JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 1.75, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PK-35 is the favorite for this match: at home they occupy 1st place, have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 14 goals in that period, while JIPPO recorded 3 wins and 12 goals in their last five fixtures. Defensively PK-35 is in better form — they conceded only 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 per match) versus JIPPO’s 5 conceded (1.0 per match), and the home side’s average xG is 1.54 compared to 1.44 for the visitors. JIPPO, however, has specific strengths: their percentage of matches without scoring is only 14% versus 29% for PK-35, and clean sheets occur in 43% of JIPPO’s matches versus 14% for the hosts, which reduces the risk of a heavy defeat for the visitors. Both teams average 1.86 goals per match each, and their matches average 2.86 total goals, with shots on target around 4.3 per match, so I expect goals from both sides. Considering PK-35’s perfect run (an average of 3 points per match in the last 5) versus 2.2 points for JIPPO and a small but tangible xG advantage, I assign a 55% probability to a home win, 25% to a draw and 20% to a JIPPO victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - No with a probability of 62% vs 38% for Yes. PK-35 concedes only 0.5 goals per game on the season and has 50% clean sheets (8 goals conceded all season); in the last 5 matches they conceded just 2 goals (0.4 avg), a strong defensive signal. JIPPO scores 1.86 goals on the season and 2.4 in the last 5 (12 goals in 5), but concedes 1.0 per game both seasonally and in the last 5, so their scoring threat is visible but not sufficient to consistently break down PK-35’s tight defense. xG analysis shows PK-35 xG for 1.86 vs JIPPO xG against 1.33, while JIPPO xG for 1.44 vs PK-35 xG against 0.86 — both teams create chances, but PK-35’s shot conversion is low at 7% vs JIPPO 16%, limiting finishing consistency. Considering PK-35 BTTS 38% vs JIPPO BTTS 57%, 50% home clean sheets and PK-35’s superior defensive form in the last 5, the stronger signal points to No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.60 for PK-35 and 1.15 for JIPPO (total 2.75); I calculated these as the average of home attack xG 1.86 and away defense xG 1.33, and away attack xG 1.44 and home defense xG 0.86. The total 2.75 is above the league average 2.47 and supports an Over 2.5 goals scenario. In the last 5 matches PK-35 scored 14 goals (avg 2.8) and conceded 2 (0.4), while JIPPO has 12 scored and 5 conceded (2.4 and 1.0); additionally PK-35 has 80% of matches Over 2.5 in the last 5, and JIPPO 60%. Season metrics show JIPPO with 57% Over 2.5 versus 25% for PK-35, however the home side generates more chances (15.5 shots and 5.75 SOT vs 11.43 and 4.43) and higher attack xG (1.86 vs 1.44), with lower conversion (7% vs 16%). As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (very high probability ~92%), Over 2.5 has a clear edge (~68%), while Over 3.5 remains less likely (~26%), therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the most statistically justified option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PK-35 keep a clean sheet at half-time in 88% of home matches and concede only 0.13 goals on average by the break; additionally 63% of their home games are level at half-time (seasonCSPercentageHT_home 88%, concededAVGHT_home 0.13, drawingAtHTPercentage_home 63%). JIPPO score on average 1.0 goal by half-time and lead at the break in 43% of their away fixtures (scoredAVGHT_away 1.0, leadingAtHTPercentage_away 43%), indicating their first-half activity. Over 90 minutes JIPPO have a higher season away goals average of 1.86 versus PK-35’s 1.13 and a higher win rate (winPercentage_away 57% vs winPercentage_home 38%), as well as superior shot conversion 16% versus 7%, giving them an advantage in the second half. PK-35, however, generate a higher xG (xG_for_avg_home 1.86 vs xG_for_avg_away 1.44), suggesting they create higher-quality chances but have lower conversion (7% vs 16%). Considering PK-35’s lower recent half-time scoring average (last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_home 0.8) versus JIPPO’s 1.4 (last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_away 1.4) and current form (PK-35 have a 100% win rate in their last 5 games, last5_winPercentage_overall_home 100%), the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a JIPPO win after 90 minutes (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PK-35 | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
PK-35 is 36% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - PK-35 · 2.2 pts / match - JIPPO
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - PK-35 · 1.47 goals / match - JIPPO
PK-35 is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.53 goals / match - PK-35 · 0.73 goals / match - JIPPO
PK-35 scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PK-35
Over / Under - JIPPO
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / match - PK-35 · 1.47 pts / match - JIPPO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PK-35
JIPPO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| PK-35 | Liga | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 32% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 61% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): PK-35 1 - 2 - 1 JIPPO. Average goals 1.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PK-35 vs JIPPO?
The Ykkösliiga match finished PK-35 1:1 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PK-35 and JIPPO?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches PK-35 won 1, JIPPO won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PK-35 vs JIPPO?
PK-35 score 1.67 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 33% of PK-35's matches and 47% of JIPPO's.
What form are PK-35 and JIPPO in?
Over the last 5 games PK-35 have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and JIPPO 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PK-35 vs JIPPO?
The statistical background for PK-35 vs JIPPO — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


