Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

PK-35 vs MP: match statistics

PK-35 crest
PK-35
3 : 1half-time 0:0
MP crest
MP

PK-35 vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PK-35 played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

PK-35: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. MP: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

PK-35 scores 1.00 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. MP scores 0.40 and concedes 0.60. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PK-35 20%, MP 0%. Over 2.5: PK-35 20%, MP 0%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

PK-35 has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.24. PK-35: 11.2 shots per match, MP: 9.6.

Match halves

PK-35: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. MP: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

PK-35: 31-45+ (2 goals). MP: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win (2): MP have won 4 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.4 points per game in this run, versus PK-35 who have won 3 of 5 and average 1.8 points per game. The visitors create more chances and have higher expected goals: MP average 9.33 shots (4.33 on target) and xG 1.25, while PK-35 record 8.33 shots (3.67 on target) and xG 1.09. However, finishing favors the hosts — PK-35 have a conversion rate of 16% versus 4% for MP and average 1.33 goals per home game; additionally PK-35 have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 9 for the visitors. MP’s defense looks more solid away: the visitors concede 0.67 goals per away game and have xGA 1.14, whereas PK-35 concede 1.00 at home and have xGA 1.61. Considering better possession (50% vs 38%), higher shot volume and superior points momentum, I forecast a narrow MP win, although the finishing discrepancy means the match may be decided by a small number of goals.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict no BTTS (selection: 'no') with 75% probability versus 25% for 'yes'. Main arguments for 'no' are seasonal indicators: BTTS percentage is 0% for home and 0% for away, while the league BTTS level is only 33%; additionally home teams have 50% clean sheets, away teams 33%, and the league shows 79% clean sheets. Seasonal goal averages are low: home average 0.5 goals per game with 5 goals in the season, away 0.33 and 2 goals, with average goals conceded 0.5 and 0.67 respectively, which suggests few goals. Counterarguments are the last 5 matches, where home scored on average 2.8 goals (xG 1.83) and away 1.8 goals (xG 1.61) and both teams have 40% BTTS in the last 5 games, which increases the chance for 'yes'. Overall, however, seasonal signals of low scoring dominate (0% BTTS, low averages 0.5 and 0.33 and high league clean sheet rate 79%), therefore I recommend 'no' with moderate-to-high confidence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects expected goals of 1.19 for PK-35 (attacking xG 1.23 vs xG conceded by MP 1.14) and 1.25 for MP (attacking xG 1.25 vs xG conceded by PK-35 1.25), totaling 2.44 goals. Both teams average roughly 10 and 9.33 shots per match with 3.0 and 4.33 on target and conversion rates of 5% and 4%, consistent with xG ≈1.2 per team. Under a Poisson distribution with mean 2.44, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 70%, Over 2.5 ≈44%, and Over 3.5 ≈23%. Note season-long team averages are very low at 0.5 (PK-35) and 0.33 (MP) with 100% of matches under 1.5, but in the last 5 matches PK-35 scores 2.8 goals per game, MP 1.8, and recent xG are 1.83 and 1.61, indicating an improvement in chance quality. Therefore the strongest and most value-driven signal is Over 1.5 (estimated ~70%), while Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 carry lower probabilities and higher risk.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select 1/1 as the most likely scenario because PK-35 led at the break in 60% of their last five matches (3 of 5) and averaged 1.8 goals by half-time (11 goals in 5 matches), while MP had only 40% leads at the break and averaged 0.8 goals by half-time in the same period. PK-35’s seasonal points average is 1.5 versus 1.0 for MP, and the season win percentage is 50% for the home side vs 33% for the visitors, which increases the hosts’ chances of maintaining a lead. The attacking output of both teams is similar on xG (PK-35 xG 1.23 vs MP xG 1.25), but BTTS is 0% for both sides this season and 79% of league matches finish with a clean sheet, so I expect a low goal volume and one-sided, single-goal outcomes. Therefore I assign the greatest weight to the 1/1 scenario (41%), with moderate chances of a draw or a turnaround by MP (MP have 80% wins in their last five matches), which explains the limited but non-zero probability of 2/2 and other scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
PK-35MP
16Shots12
PK-35MP
5Shots on target4
PK-35MP
1.86xG1.32
PK-35MP
11Corners4
PK-35MP
70Dangerous attacks39
PK-35MP
12Fouls9
PK-35MP
2Cards1
PK-35MP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.4
PK-35MP
0.8Goals conceded / match0.6
PK-35MP
45%Average possession50%
PK-35MP
4.4Shots on target / match3.8
PK-35MP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.2Shots per match9.6
PK-35MP
4.4Shots on target3.8
PK-35MP
8.9%Shot conversion4.2%
PK-35MP
45%Possession50%
PK-35MP
1.4xG for1.24
PK-35MP
1.26xG against1.18
PK-35MP

Shooting quality

PK-35: BalancedMP: Balanced
PK-35MP
Accuracy (shots on target)39%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.11

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PK-35 is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - PK-35 · 1.2 pts / match - MP

PK-35
WDWLL
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
WDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
MP
LLLWW
Season result split
40% W0% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 150% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - PK-35 · 0.4 goals / match - MP

MP is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - PK-35 · 0.6 goals / match - MP

PK-35 scoring profile: mixed

PK-35 scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

MP scoring profile: mixed

MP scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

5Goals scored (season)2
PK-35MP
4Goals conceded (season)3
PK-35MP
1.8Average goals in match1
PK-35MP
5Goals scored (last 5)2
PK-35MP
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
PK-35MP

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal40%
PK-35MP
20%2 goals0%
PK-35MP
20%3 goals0%
PK-35MP
20%4 goals0%
PK-35MP

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal60%
PK-35MP
20%2 goals0%
PK-35MP
0%3 goals0%
PK-35MP
0%4 goals0%
PK-35MP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
PK-35MP
20%BTTS in both halves0%
PK-35MP
20%Scored in both halves0%
PK-35MP

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
PK-35MP
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PK-35MP
20%BTTS - last 50%
PK-35MP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
PK-35MP
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
PK-35MP
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PK-35MP

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time20%
PK-35MP
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PK-35MP
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PK-35MP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - PK-35 · 1.4 pts / match - MP

PK-35 - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
MP - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.4
PK-35MP
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.4
PK-35MP
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
PK-35MP
1Average goals (1st half)0.8
PK-35MP
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
PK-35MP
60%No goal before half-time60%
PK-35MP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)0.8
PK-35MP
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0
PK-35MP
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
PK-35MP
0.8Average goals (2nd half)0.2
PK-35MP
60%Clean sheet after half-time80%
PK-35MP
80%No goal after half-time100%
PK-35MP

PK-35 - second-half results

20% W60% R20% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - second-half results

0% W80% R20% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.80.2
1 goal80%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
65%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
10%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
16%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
36%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

PK-35LigaMP
Average goals in match 1.802.17 1.00
Both teams scored 20%33% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%38% 0%
Clean sheets 40%40% 40%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 80%
Goal after half-time 40%54% 20%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+60%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MPYellow cardAkseli Tervaniemi
  2. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Maximo TolonenOff: Eino-Iivari Pitkälä
  3. PK-35GoalIrfan SadikAssist: Karo Räsänen
  4. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Otto SalmensuuOff: Irfan Sadik
  5. PK-35Yellow cardJuta Nakanishi
  6. PK-35Yellow cardOtto Salmensuu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of PK-35 vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished PK-35 3:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PK-35 vs MP?

PK-35 score 1.00 goals per game on average and MP 0.40. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 20% of PK-35's matches and 0% of MP's.

What form are PK-35 and MP in?

Over the last 5 games PK-35 have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and MP 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PK-35 vs MP?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PK-35 vs MP: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.