Plateau United vs Kano Pillars: match statistics
Plateau United vs Kano Pillars: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Plateau United played Kano Pillars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Venue: Värendsvallen. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Plateau United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kano Pillars: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Plateau United scores 1.03 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Kano Pillars scores 1.00 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Plateau United 41%, Kano Pillars 35%. Over 2.5: Plateau United 41%, Kano Pillars 38%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Plateau United has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.37. Plateau United: 9.2 shots per match, Kano Pillars: 2.6.
Match halves
Plateau United: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.59. Kano Pillars: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.49.
Goals by minute
Plateau United: 46-60 (9 goals). Kano Pillars: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Plateau United are the favorites in this match: at home they win 72% of games, score on average 1.56 goals and concede only 0.56 goals per match, with 56% of home fixtures ending in a clean sheet. Kano Pillars have very poor away numbers – they have won just 6% of away matches, lose 78%, score on average 0.5 goals per match and in 56% of away games fail to find the net. The difference in chance creation is clear: Plateau average 13.18 shots and 4.65 on target at home with xG 1.66, while Kano away average 7.67 shots, 2 on target and xG 1.05. Short-term trends, however, favor Kano – the visitors have 3 wins in their last 5 matches, 8 goals scored and 1.8 points per game in that period, whereas Plateau in their last 5 have only 1 win, 5 goals scored and 0.8 points per game. Considering Plateau’s dominant home defense (0.56 goals conceded and 56% clean sheets) and Pillars’ awful away stats (0.5 goals and 6% wins), I tip the hosts to win; suggested probability split is 65% for Plateau, 20% for a draw and 15% for Kano.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Plateau United at home averages 1.47 goals scored and concedes only 0.47, keeping a clean sheet in 58% of home matches and failing to score in 16% of them, while Kano Pillars away average 0.50 goals scored and concede 1.61, failing to score in 56% of away games and having only 17% clean sheets. Seasonal BTTS rate is 32% for Plateau and 39% for Kano, with league average BTTS at 38%, and BTTS occurred in 40% of the last 5 matches for both teams. A simple model multiplying the probability that Plateau will score (100-16 = 84%) and that Kano will score (100-56 = 44%) yields roughly a 37% chance of BTTS - Yes. Additionally, xG shows a disparity in chance creation and defense: Plateau has an attacking xG of 2.25 and opponents' xG of 0.73, while Kano has attacking xG of 1.05 and opponents' xG of 1.74, suggesting a home advantage in chance creation and greater vulnerability for Kano on the road. Considering the strong signal from Plateau's 58% clean sheets and Kano's 56% of away matches without a goal, together with the simple model result (~37% for Yes), I recommend a BTTS = "No" bet (37% Yes vs 63% No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining attack and defense by xG yields expected goals: Plateau United ~2.00 (xG_for 2.25 vs xG_against away 1.74) and Kano Pillars ~0.89 (xG_for 1.05 vs xG_against home 0.73), total ~2.89 goals. Plateau averages 17.67 shots and 6.0 on target per match, while Kano only has 7.67 shots and 2.0 on target, confirming the home side’s superior offensive potential. Season metrics show moderate historical overs: Over 2.5 occurred 37% for Plateau and 39% for Kano, but the high home xG and weak away defense (seasonConcededAVG_away 1.61) raise my assessment of Over 2.5 to about 57%. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 — I estimate a 78% probability (Under 22%), since the combined expected goals ~2.89 comfortably exceed 1.5. Note that Plateau has 58% clean sheets this season, which somewhat counters, but the xG advantage (2.25 vs 1.05) and shot volume differential provide a clear signal for Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly favor Plateau United: the hosts have led at the break in 47% of their home matches and average 0.84 goals by half-time versus 0.17 scored by Kano Pillars. Plateau’s attack posts higher xG (2.25 vs 1.05 for Kano) and more on-target shots (6.0 vs 2.0), increasing the likelihood of taking and maintaining a lead. Over full matches Plateau win 74% of home fixtures, whereas Kano win only 6% of away games and concede an average of 1.61 goals per match, so a turnaround is unlikely. Additionally, the hosts have 58% clean sheets for the season and 79% clean half-times at home, reducing the risk of conceding after the break; therefore the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time home lead and victory (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Plateau United | Kano Pillars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 11% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.52 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 3.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kano Pillars is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Plateau United · 1.8 pts / match - Kano Pillars
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kano Pillars is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.08 goals / match - Plateau United · 1.03 goals / match - Kano Pillars
Plateau United scores in 65% of matches (24 of 37 matches), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 38% (14 of 37 matches).
Kano Pillars scores in 65% of matches (24 of 37 matches), while Plateau United keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Plateau United
Over / Under - Kano Pillars
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kano Pillars is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Plateau United · 1.35 pts / match - Kano Pillars
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Plateau United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kano Pillars - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Plateau United
Kano Pillars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Plateau United | Liga | Kano Pillars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.11 | 2.00 | • 2.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 41% | 38% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 33% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 37% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 51% | 60% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Plateau UnitedYellow cardIfegwu Abdallah
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Plateau United 0 - 0 - 1 Kano Pillars. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?
The NPFL match finished Plateau United 1:0 Kano Pillars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?
Plateau United score 1.03 goals per game on average and Kano Pillars 1.00. The NPFL average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Plateau United's matches and 35% of Kano Pillars's.
What form are Plateau United and Kano Pillars in?
Over the last 5 games Plateau United have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kano Pillars 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


