Platense vs San Lorenzo: match statistics
Platense vs San Lorenzo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Platense played San Lorenzo in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Platense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. San Lorenzo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Platense scores 0.71 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. San Lorenzo scores 0.86 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Platense 36%, San Lorenzo 36%. Over 2.5: Platense 21%, San Lorenzo 14%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Platense has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.17. Platense: 11.0 shots per match, San Lorenzo: 9.4.
Match halves
Platense: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.43. San Lorenzo: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Platense: 76-90+ (4 goals). San Lorenzo: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.04 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect a draw (X): San Lorenzo records as much as 71% draws away and has 57% clean sheets, which significantly increases the likelihood of a points share. Platense at home averages 10.67 shots and 3.67 on target with xG 1.33, but this yields only 0.67 goals per game and 50% of matches without scoring, so low finishing hampers their attack. San Lorenzo away concedes just 0.43 goals on average with xG against 1.46 and has conceded 1 goal in the last 5 matches overall, whereas Platense conceded 8 goals in the same period, showing the visitors’ defensive advantage. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors: San Lorenzo has 1.8 points per game versus Platense’s 1.0 (results 2 wins and 3 draws vs 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses). Therefore I assign a 50% probability to a draw, 30% to a home win due to higher xG and greater shot volume, and 20% to a San Lorenzo win because of their defensive stability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict no BTTS (No) with a probability of 64% versus 36% for Yes. The main argument is the high clean sheet rates: Platense 57% and San Lorenzo 57% this season, and a league clean sheet rate of 71%, indicating matches without goals from both sides occur frequently. Seasonal BTTS ratios are low — Platense 43% and San Lorenzo 29% versus a league average of 44% — and in San Lorenzo’s last 5 matches they had only 20% BTTS and conceded on average 0.2 goals (1 goal in 5 matches). Platense creates more offensive chances (season xG 1.49 vs 0.85, 12.29 shots and 4.29 on target vs 6.57 and 2.0) and has 60% BTTS in the last 5, however their last 5 matches also show an average of 1.6 goals conceded, so both teams scoring is mainly possible due to home side errors. I weigh these signals as contrasting, but San Lorenzo’s defensive edge and the high frequency of clean sheets tilt the outcome toward a higher probability of No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I estimate Platense to score about 1.48 goals (xG attack 1.49 vs xG conceded to San Lorenzo 1.46, average ≈1.48) and San Lorenzo about 1.12 goals (xG attack 0.85 vs xG conceded to Platense 1.39, average ≈1.12), totaling ≈2.60 goals. The Poisson distribution for lambda=2.60 yields probability of over 1.5 goals ≈73% (0–1 goals ≈27%), over 2.5 ≈48% and over 3.5 ≈26%. Platense averages 12.29 shots and 4.29 on target with a 10% conversion and xG 1.49, confirming offensive threat; San Lorenzo posts 6.57 shots and 2.0 on target, 7% conversion and xG 0.85, creating fewer chances but its xG conceded 1.46 indicates defensive vulnerability. Season metrics show Platense had 57% of matches over 1.5 goals, San Lorenzo 29%, and the league goals average is 2.04 — the expected 2.60 is clearly above this average, favoring the over 1.5. Therefore I recommend an over bet at the 1.5 line as the strongest signal (over1.5 ≈73%), while the 2.5 line is almost even (~48%/52%), and over 3.5 has low probability (~26%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). San Lorenzo finishes the first half level in 86% of their matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 86%) and has a high overall draw rate of 71% (drawPercentage_away = 71%), which strongly favors no decisive result. Platense shows better offensive metrics — goals per game 1.29 vs 0.43 and xG 1.49 vs 0.85, and on average 4.29 shots on target versus 2.0 for the visitors — but their scoring by half-time is low (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.29 vs scoredAVGHT_away = 0.0) and both teams have high clean-sheet-at-half rates (sezonCSPercentageHT_home = 57% vs sezonCSPercentageHT_away = 86%), which reduces the likelihood of early goals. Additionally, Platense scores more often late in matches (4 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for the away side), so any turnaround is more likely to occur after the break than before it; therefore X/X receives the highest probability (33%), followed by X/1 (18%) and 1/1 (15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Platense | San Lorenzo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
San Lorenzo is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Platense · 1.2 pts / match - San Lorenzo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Lorenzo is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - Platense · 0.86 goals / match - San Lorenzo
Platense scores in 43% of matches (6 of 14 matches), while San Lorenzo keeps a clean sheet in 57% (8 of 14 matches).
San Lorenzo scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Platense keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Platense
Over / Under - San Lorenzo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Platense is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - Platense · 1 pts / match - San Lorenzo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Platense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
San Lorenzo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Platense
San Lorenzo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Platense | Liga | San Lorenzo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.57 | 2.04 | ▼ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 43% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 21% | 34% | ▼ 14% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 36% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 59% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 70% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Platense 2 - 0 - 1 San Lorenzo. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Platense vs San Lorenzo?
The Primera División match finished Platense 0:1 San Lorenzo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Platense and San Lorenzo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Platense won 2, San Lorenzo won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Platense vs San Lorenzo?
Platense score 0.71 goals per game on average and San Lorenzo 0.86. The Primera División average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Platense's matches and 36% of San Lorenzo's.
What form are Platense and San Lorenzo in?
Over the last 5 games Platense have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and San Lorenzo 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Platense vs San Lorenzo?
The statistical background for Platense vs San Lorenzo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


