England - EFL League OneHome ParkData current as of 02 November 2026

Plymouth Argyle vs Reading: match statistics

Plymouth Argyle crest
Plymouth Argyle
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Reading crest
Reading

Plymouth Argyle vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Plymouth Argyle played Reading in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Home Park. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Plymouth Argyle: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Reading: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Plymouth Argyle scores 1.62 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Reading scores 2.08 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Plymouth Argyle 46%, Reading 58%. Over 2.5: Plymouth Argyle 54%, Reading 58%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Reading has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.55. Plymouth Argyle: 14.3 shots per match, Reading: 15.6.

Match halves

Plymouth Argyle: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00. Reading: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

Plymouth Argyle: 46-60 (7 goals). Reading: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Plymouth Argyle have a slight home advantage: they have won 50% of their home matches, while Reading have won 20% of their away games. The visitors, however, are in better recent form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches compared with the hosts’ 2; they have also conceded 5 goals over that stretch, against 10 for Plymouth. Reading create more chances away from home, averaging 1.74 xG and 5.2 shots on target per match, compared with Plymouth’s 1.40 xG and 3.67 shots on target at home. That advantage does not always translate into goals: Reading have failed to score in 40% of their away games, and 40% of those matches have ended in a draw. I therefore narrowly favour the hosts, although Reading’s more clinical performances in recent weeks mean a draw or an away win remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS landed in 57% of Plymouth’s home matches and 60% of Reading’s away games, so the season data give a slight edge to both teams scoring. Plymouth average 2.43 goals at home and have failed to score in none of those matches, while Reading concede an average of 1.2 goals away from home. The visitors also have attacking credentials: their average away xG is 1.74, and Plymouth have conceded 10 goals in their last five matches. The biggest risk to this bet is Reading’s scoring record: they have failed to score in 40% of their away games, while Plymouth have kept a clean sheet in 43% of their home matches. Therefore, BTTS - Yes has only a moderate edge and is not a confident pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: this line was beaten in 86% of Plymouth’s home matches and 60% of Reading’s away matches. The hosts score an average of 2.43 goals, while the visitors concede 1.2, pointing to a significant contribution from Plymouth. Reading average 1.74 xG, but Plymouth keep a clean sheet in 43% of their home matches, so an away goal is not guaranteed. Although at least 3 goals were scored in 57% of the hosts’ matches and 60% of the visitors’ matches, the Over 1.5 goals line is supported much more strongly by the data and is therefore the recommended bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Reading were level at the break in 3 of their 5 away matches and did not concede in the first half in any of them. Plymouth average 1.0 goal before half-time at home, but had the lead at the break in only 3 of 7 matches, so an early lead is far from certain. The hosts’ advantage becomes more pronounced after the break: they won the second half in 86% of their home matches and scored an average of 1.43 goals in those periods, while Reading conceded an average of 1.2 goals away from home. Plymouth’s eventual win is also supported by their 71% home win rate, compared with Reading’s 20% away win rate. The risk is heightened by the visitors’ recent form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches, so a half-time draw followed by a Plymouth win has only a slight edge over the hosts leading from start to finish.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Plymouth ArgyleReading
13Shots14
Plymouth ArgyleReading
4Shots on target4
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.37xG1.39
Plymouth ArgyleReading
3Corners7
Plymouth ArgyleReading
36Dangerous attacks31
Plymouth ArgyleReading
14Fouls16
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1Cards3
Plymouth ArgyleReading

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.62Goals scored / match2.08
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.46Goals conceded / match1.08
Plymouth ArgyleReading
45%Average possession48%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
4.62Shots on target / match5.08
Plymouth ArgyleReading

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.31Shots per match15.58
Plymouth ArgyleReading
4.62Shots on target5.08
Plymouth ArgyleReading
11.3%Shot conversion13.4%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
45%Possession48%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.55xG for1.66
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.49xG against1.36
Plymouth ArgyleReading

Shooting quality

Plymouth Argyle: AttackingReading: Attacking
Plymouth ArgyleReading
Accuracy (shots on target)32%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Reading is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Plymouth Argyle · 2 pts / match - Reading

Plymouth Argyle
WWLLW
Season result split
54% W8% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Reading
DWLWW
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-3
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Plymouth Argyle · 2.08 goals / match - Reading

Reading is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Plymouth Argyle · 1.08 goals / match - Reading

Plymouth Argyle scoring profile: strong

Plymouth Argyle scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Plymouth Argyle keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

21Goals scored (season)25
Plymouth ArgyleReading
19Goals conceded (season)13
Plymouth ArgyleReading
3.08Average goals in match3.17
Plymouth ArgyleReading
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Plymouth ArgyleReading
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Plymouth ArgyleReading

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal83%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
54%2 goals58%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
31%3 goals33%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
8%4 goals17%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal67%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
54%2 goals25%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
15%3 goals8%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
0%4 goals8%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time8%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
46%Scored in both halves25%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
40%BTTS - last 560%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - Plymouth Argyle · 1.67 pts / match - Reading

Plymouth Argyle - half-time state
38% leading31% draw31% trailing
Reading - half-time state
42% leading42% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.67
Plymouth ArgyleReading
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Plymouth ArgyleReading
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.31Average goals (1st half)1
Plymouth ArgyleReading
54%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
46%No goal before half-time58%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)1.92
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
Plymouth ArgyleReading
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Plymouth ArgyleReading
1.77Average goals (2nd half)2.17
Plymouth ArgyleReading
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Plymouth ArgyleReading
38%No goal after half-time33%
Plymouth ArgyleReading

Plymouth Argyle - second-half results

38% W31% D31% L
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Reading - second-half results

58% W17% D25% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Plymouth Argyle - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.40
Goals scored / match0.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Plymouth Argyle
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
5
16-30
3
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Reading
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
0
16-30
7
0
31-45
7
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Plymouth Argyle

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Plymouth ArgyleLigaReading
Average goals in match▲ 3.082.81▲ 3.17
Both teams scored▼ 46%58%• 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 54%54%▲ 58%
Clean sheets▼ 23%25%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%69%▼ 58%
Goal after half-time▲ 92%84%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Plymouth ArgyleYellow cardWill Evans
  2. Plymouth ArgyleSubstitutionOn: Mathias Ross JensenOff: Julio José Pleguezuelo Selva
  3. ReadingYellow cardJeriel Dorsett
  4. ReadingYellow cardKyrell Lisbie
  5. ReadingYellow cardAndrew Ferai Rinomhota

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Plymouth Argyle 0 - 1 - 1 Reading. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Plymouth Argyle vs Reading?

The EFL League One match finished Plymouth Argyle 0:0 Reading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Plymouth Argyle and Reading?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Plymouth Argyle won 0, Reading won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Plymouth Argyle vs Reading?

Plymouth Argyle score 1.62 goals per game on average and Reading 2.08. The EFL League One average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Plymouth Argyle's matches and 58% of Reading's.

What form are Plymouth Argyle and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Plymouth Argyle have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Reading 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plymouth Argyle vs Reading?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.