Plymouth Parkway vs Basingstoke Town: match statistics
Plymouth Parkway vs Basingstoke Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Plymouth Parkway played Basingstoke Town in Southern League Premier South (England). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Plymouth Parkway: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Basingstoke Town: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Plymouth Parkway scores 1.27 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. Basingstoke Town scores 1.41 and concedes 1.73. League average: 3.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Plymouth Parkway 59%, Basingstoke Town 68%. Over 2.5: Plymouth Parkway 62%, Basingstoke Town 59%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Basingstoke Town has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.09. Plymouth Parkway: 1.0 shots per match, Basingstoke Town: 1.3.
Match halves
Plymouth Parkway: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.76. Basingstoke Town: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Plymouth Parkway: 76-90+ (11 goals). Basingstoke Town: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Southern League Premier South: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Plymouth Parkway holds a statistical edge and I tip them to win: at home they have won 50% of matches versus Basingstoke’s 22% away win rate. Hosts average 1.33 goals scored and concede 1.44 at home, while visitors record 1.44 goals scored away and concede 1.67, indicating a more stable Plymouth defense. Basingstoke, however, generate higher xG (1.52 vs 1.32) and more shots (12.25 vs 9.4), and have scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches compared to the hosts’ 7, so the visitors’ attack can be dangerous but is less efficient (conversion 10% vs 13%). Additionally, Plymouth post higher possession (56% vs 48%), slightly more shots on target (5.6 vs 5.5), a higher clean sheets percentage (22% vs 11%) and a lower non-scoring rate (22% vs 28%), all favouring match control; in the last 5 fixtures the hosts averaged 2 points per game, the visitors 1.2. Based on this I assign a 60% probability to a Plymouth win, 25% to a draw and 15% to a Basingstoke win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: Plymouth 68% and Basingstoke 67%, both above the league average of 60%, indicating that most of their matches see goals at both ends. Both sides concede frequently — Plymouth have conceded 71 goals (1.79 per game), Basingstoke 64 (1.67 per game) — while averaging scored goals of 1.37 and 1.44 respectively, so fixtures tend to be open. In the last 5 matches Basingstoke have BTTS 80% and scored 11 goals (2.2 per game), Plymouth 60% and 7 goals (1.4 per game), which further confirms both teams’ propensity to exchange goals. Chance-quality data shows Plymouth generate xG 1.93 and average 8.0 shots on target, while Basingstoke xG 1.52 and 5.5 shots on target, and both teams have only 11% of matches without conceding, so the strongest signal from the data is BTTS = Yes (Goal/Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG estimates give a total expected goals of around 3.18: home ~1.65 (home xG 1.93 vs xG against guests 1.37 → (1.93+1.37)/2=1.65), away ~1.53 (away xG 1.52 vs xG against home 1.54 → 1.53). This is close to the league average of 3.15 and supported by seasonal percentages — Over 1.5 occurred in 89% of Plymouth’s matches and 72% of Basingstoke’s, while Over 2.5 is 68% for hosts and 50% for guests. Both teams’ defenses are prone to conceding: Plymouth conceded 71 goals, Basingstoke 64, and clean sheets occur in only 11% of cases; BTTS is 68% and 67%. Plymouth averages 8.0 shots on target with a 17% conversion (vs 5.5 SoT and 10% conversion for the visitors), and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 goals (avg. 1.4) vs 11 goals for the visitors (avg. 2.2), which further favors Over 1.5 goals. As a result I assign Over 1.5 the highest probability at 85% (Under 15%), Over 2.5 at 64% and Over 3.5 at 30%, therefore the best and strongest play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the visitors hold a slight advantage: they average 0.83 goals compared to the hosts’ 0.74, while the hosts concede an average of 1.00 goal by the break; in the last five matches the visitors led at the break in 60% of games. After the break the picture favours Plymouth — their xG is 1.93 versus the visitors’ 1.52, they average 8.0 shots on target versus 5.5 and have a conversion rate of 17% versus 10%, which translates into more clear-cut chances. In the last five matches the home side averages 2.0 points after the break and wins the second half in 60% of cases, whereas the visitors have 0.4 points and 0% second-half wins in that period. Additionally both teams score in 68% and 67% of matches respectively, so goals from both sides are likely; this creates the strongest signal for a turnaround after half-time, hence the recommendation 2/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Plymouth Parkway | Basingstoke Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 21% | 15% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.06 | 1.28 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 5.77 | 7.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Plymouth Parkway is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Plymouth Parkway · 1.2 pts / match - Basingstoke Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Basingstoke Town is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Plymouth Parkway · 1.41 goals / match - Basingstoke Town
Basingstoke Town is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.92 goals / match - Plymouth Parkway · 1.73 goals / match - Basingstoke Town
Plymouth Parkway scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while Basingstoke Town keeps a clean sheet in 11% (4 of 37 matches).
Basingstoke Town scores in 76% of matches (28 of 37 matches), while Plymouth Parkway keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Plymouth Parkway
Over / Under - Basingstoke Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Plymouth Parkway - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Basingstoke Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (22). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Plymouth Parkway
Basingstoke Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).
Teams vs league
| Plymouth Parkway | Liga | Basingstoke Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.19 | 3.14 | • 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 60% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 62% | 61% | ▼ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▲ 84% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 84% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Plymouth Parkway 0 - 1 - 0 Basingstoke Town. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Plymouth Parkway vs Basingstoke Town?
The Southern League Premier South match finished Plymouth Parkway 3:0 Basingstoke Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Plymouth Parkway vs Basingstoke Town?
Plymouth Parkway score 1.27 goals per game on average and Basingstoke Town 1.41. The Southern League Premier South average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Plymouth Parkway's matches and 68% of Basingstoke Town's.
What form are Plymouth Parkway and Basingstoke Town in?
Over the last 5 games Plymouth Parkway have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Basingstoke Town 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plymouth Parkway vs Basingstoke Town?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


