Pogoń Siedlce vs Stal Rzeszów: match statistics
Pogoń Siedlce vs Stal Rzeszów: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pogoń Siedlce played Stal Rzeszów in 1. Liga (Poland). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Pogoń Siedlce: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Stal Rzeszów: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pogoń Siedlce scores 1.00 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Stal Rzeszów scores 1.39 and concedes 1.65. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pogoń Siedlce 45%, Stal Rzeszów 74%. Over 2.5: Pogoń Siedlce 35%, Stal Rzeszów 68%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Stal Rzeszów has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.28. Pogoń Siedlce: 10.4 shots per match, Stal Rzeszów: 15.8.
Match halves
Pogoń Siedlce: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.58. Stal Rzeszów: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Pogoń Siedlce: 31-45+ (11 goals). Stal Rzeszów: 16-30 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Pogoń Siedlce concedes an average of 1.00 goals per home match with 33% clean sheets, while Stal Rzeszów as an away side concedes 1.87 goals per match with only 13% clean sheets. Although Stal have scored 43 goals this season versus Pogoń’s 31 and register higher xG (1.57 vs 1.37) and more shots per game (13.2 vs 10.93), their defense is highly unstable (51 goals conceded this season). Form supports the pick: Pogoń have won 2 of their last 5 matches and average 1.2 points in that period, whereas Stal have lost all 5 recent games, collecting 0 points and conceding 10 goals in those five matches. Efficiency metrics show a small difference (conversion 11% for Stal vs 10% for Pogoń), indicating the visitors can create chances, but their weaker defense and poor current form increase the risk of defeat. I assign Pogoń a 50% probability, draw 25%, and Stal 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are high: Pogoń Siedlce has 69% of matches with both teams scoring, Stal Rzeszów 80%, and the league average for BTTS is 64%, which generally favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. Both sides regularly score and concede — the home team averages 1.31 goals scored and 1.44 conceded, while the visitors average 1.47 scored and 1.87 conceded per match, indicating a high likelihood of goal exchanges. xG confirms offensive activity: Pogoń posts xG 1.99 versus xG against Stal 1.88, and Stal has xG 1.57 versus xG against Pogoń 1.67, so hosts create slightly more but the visitors also generate 1.57 xG. Additionally, 56% of Pogoń’s matches and 80% of Stal’s matches finish over 2.5 goals, and the combined over 2.5 & BTTS occurs in 56% and 67% of their games respectively, strengthening the 'both teams to score' signal. The main counterargument is 0% BTTS in Pogoń’s last 5 matches versus 60% for Stal and the visitors' poor form (last 5 losses), therefore the forecast assigns 74% to "yes" and 26% to "no" — I pick BTTS - Yes as the most probable outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects 1.94 goals for Pogoń and 1.62 for Stal (total 3.56), calculated from average xG: 1.99 (home xG) and 1.88 (xG conceded by visitors) and 1.57 (away xG) and 1.67 (xG conceded by hosts). Seasonal metrics show a strong propensity for goalful matches: Pogoń has 75% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Stal 93%, and the 2.5 line was exceeded in 56% of Pogoń’s games and 80% of Stal’s (average ~68%). Both teams often score — 69% of Pogoń’s matches and 80% of Stal’s end with both teams scoring — and season tallies are 31 scored and 36 conceded for Pogoń and 43–51 for Stal, indicating vulnerable defenses. In the last 5 matches Pogoń scored 4 and conceded 6 (avg 0.8 and 1.2), Stal scored 3 and conceded 10 (avg 0.6 and 2.0), and Pogoń generates more shots (18.25 avg, 5.19 on target) than Stal (13.2 and 4.13) with conversion rates of 7% and 11% respectively. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (84% over vs 16% under); Over 2.5 is estimated at 68% and Over 3.5 at 36%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a half-time draw with Pogoń Siedlce winning after 90 minutes (X/1). The half-time draw is supported by data: the home side were level at the break in 50% of matches, while the visitors led at the break in 27% of fixtures; in Pogoń’s last five games they average 0.2 goals by half-time versus Stal’s 0.6, indicating a balanced first half. In second halves Pogoń hold a clear advantage — home xG 1.99 versus away 1.57, average shots 18.25 vs 13.2, and 19 points gained in second halves (ppg_2hg_home 1.19) compared to Stal’s 14 points (ppg_2hg_away 0.93) — this favors a turnaround from a draw to a home win. Additionally, Stal Rzeszów are in very poor form (last five: lllll, 0% wins and 100% losses), so they are less likely to maintain a lead or mount an effective response in the second half. Considering also the high BTTS rates (69% for the home side and 80% for the away side) and Pogoń’s superior chance creation, the X/1 scenario appears to be the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pogoń Siedlce | Stal Rzeszów | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stal Rzeszów is 39% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Pogoń Siedlce · 1.39 goals / match - Stal Rzeszów
Pogoń Siedlce is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Pogoń Siedlce · 1.65 goals / match - Stal Rzeszów
Pogoń Siedlce scores in 65% of matches (20 of 31 matches), while Stal Rzeszów keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).
Stal Rzeszów scores in 87% of matches (27 of 31 matches), while Pogoń Siedlce keeps a clean sheet in 29% (9 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pogoń Siedlce
Over / Under - Stal Rzeszów
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stal Rzeszów is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Pogoń Siedlce · 1.32 pts / match - Stal Rzeszów
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pogoń Siedlce - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Stal Rzeszów - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pogoń Siedlce
Stal Rzeszów
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Pogoń Siedlce | Liga | Stal Rzeszów | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.16 | 2.96 | • 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 64% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 59% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 20% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 81% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Pogoń Siedlce 0 - 1 - 0 Stal Rzeszów. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pogoń Siedlce vs Stal Rzeszów?
The 1. Liga match finished Pogoń Siedlce 1:2 Stal Rzeszów. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pogoń Siedlce vs Stal Rzeszów?
Pogoń Siedlce score 1.00 goals per game on average and Stal Rzeszów 1.39. The 1. Liga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Pogoń Siedlce's matches and 74% of Stal Rzeszów's.
What form are Pogoń Siedlce and Stal Rzeszów in?
Over the last 5 games Pogoń Siedlce have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Stal Rzeszów 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pogoń Siedlce vs Stal Rzeszów?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pogoń Siedlce vs Stal Rzeszów: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


