Pogoń Szczecin II vs Wda Świecie: match statistics

Pogoń Szczecin II holds a clear offensive edge: at home they average 2.56 goals per match, while Wda Świecie scores 0.94 on the road; season goals 58 vs 42. The hosts create better chances — their home xG is 1.59 versus the visitors’ 1.25 xG away, they average 5.57 shots on target per game against Wda’s 3.13 and have a higher conversion rate 17% vs 9%. In the last 5 matches Pogoń scored 13 goals (2.6 per game), recorded 3 wins and 2 draws delivering 2.2 points per game, while Wda in that period scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and averaged 1.4 points per game (2-1-2). The visitors’ strengths are a slightly better clean-sheet rate away (38% vs 19%) and a lower average of goals conceded on the road 1.5 versus the hosts’ 1.75, but the large difference in goal balance (+13 for Pogoń at home vs -9 for Wda away) and the fact that Pogoń have not had a match without scoring at home (0% of home games without a goal) favour the hosts. I therefore suggest a home win as the safest scenario.

I indicate BTTS - Yes: the home team has a seasonal BTTS rate of 56% versus 38% for the away side, but in the last 5 matches Pogoń II has as much as 80% BTTS and Wda 60%. Seasonal goals per game are 1.69 scored and 1.63 conceded for Pogoń, and 0.94 scored and 1.5 conceded for Wda, which shows both teams regularly concede goals. The last 5 matches confirm the hosts' offensive form (2.6 scored and 1.4 conceded) and improvement from the visitors (1.6 scored and 1.2 conceded), and xG over the last 5 is 1.65 for Pogoń and 1.47 for Wda, meaning both sides generate over 1.4 xG per match. Additionally Pogoń averages 4.87 shots on target versus Wda's 3.13 and has a higher conversion rate (15% vs 9%), which increases the likelihood that both teams will find the net. Considering the 80% and 60% in the last 5 and the league BTTS average of 52%, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% for 'yes' and 30% for 'no'.

The combined expected goals calculated from xG and opponent defense are about 1.51 for Pogoń II and 1.46 for Wda, totaling 2.97 goals. A model based on this value (λ=2.97) yields probabilities of over 1.5 goals ≈80%, over 2.5 ≈57% and over 3.5 ≈35%. Seasonal stats support this direction: Pogoń had 88% of matches with >1.5 goals and 69% with >2.5, Wda respectively 63% and 44%, and in the last 5 matches Pogoń has 100% of games over 2.5 goals (Wda 60%). Additionally the hosts average 11.93 shots and 4.87 shots on target with a 15% conversion versus the visitors' 10.0 shots and 3.13 on target and 9% conversion, which increases the likelihood of goals. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (≈80%); Over 2.5 is also realistic (~57%) but with lower confidence.

Pogoń II scores an average of 0.69 goals by half-time versus 0.25 for Wda and led at the break in 31% of matches, while Wda did not lead at half-time in the dataset (0%), which strongly supports the hosts taking a lead at the break. Over the full match Pogoń averages 1.69 goals per game versus 0.94 for the visitors and wins 56% of home matches compared to Wda’s 31% win rate, and the advantage in xG (1.51 vs 1.25) together with higher shot conversion (15% vs 9%) increases the likelihood of a full-time victory for the hosts. The home side frequently add goals after the break (9 goals in minutes 76–90 vs 4 for the visitors) and in the last 5 matches they led at half-time in 40% of games, which supports the scenario of maintaining the lead through to the end. At the same time there is a noticeable risk of a draw at half-time (last 5 matches: half-time draw 40% for the hosts and 80% for the visitors), hence a significant role for the X/1 scenario as an alternative.