Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Police Uganda vs UPDF: match statistics

Police Uganda crest
Police Uganda
2 : 0half-time 1:0
UPDF crest
UPDF

Police Uganda vs UPDF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Police Uganda played UPDF in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 29 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Police Uganda: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. UPDF: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Police Uganda scores 1.48 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. UPDF scores 0.88 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Police Uganda 68%, UPDF 40%. Over 2.5: Police Uganda 60%, UPDF 40%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Police Uganda has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.61. Police Uganda: 11.3 shots per match, UPDF: 11.2.

Match halves

Police Uganda: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.80. UPDF: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Police Uganda: 76-90+ (10 goals). UPDF: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Police Uganda are the favorites: they sit 6th vs UPDF's 12th, have 12 wins this season vs 5 and have scored 37 goals vs 22, giving them a clear season-long advantage. At home Police average 1.58 goals scored and concede only 0.83 per match, have a 67% home win rate and average 4.83 shots on target, while UPDF away average 1.08 goals, concede 1.75, have a 25% win rate and 3.64 shots on target. The efficiency gap is significant: the hosts register 13% shot conversion and 17% of matches without conceding, whereas the visitors have 9% conversion and 42% of matches without scoring, which favors Police despite similar xG (1.72 vs 1.60). It is worth noting, however, that in the last 5 matches UPDF have scored 8 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game versus Police's 6 goals and 1.2 points, indicating better form for the visitors. Taking this into account, I expect the hosts' defensive advantage and finishing to prevail, therefore I tip a Police victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Based on the data, I lean toward BTTS - Yes: season BTTS rates are 38% for Police Uganda and 42% for UPDF, but in the last 5 matches Police has 80% BTTS while UPDF has 40%. Both teams generate similar xG: Police 1.61 and UPDF 1.60, and average 3.15 and 3.64 shots on target respectively, indicating chance creation. Although season goals scored are low (Police 0.69 with 6% conversion, UPDF 1.08 with 9% conversion), UPDF concedes 1.75 goals seasonally and Police concedes 1.8 goals on average in the last 5 matches, so both sides have opportunities to score. On that basis I assign a 62% probability to BTTS - Yes and 38% to No, since higher xG and recent signs of goals conceded indicate an increased likelihood of Goal/Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model gives 1.56 xG for Police Uganda (xG scored 1.61 and xG conceded vs UPDF 1.51) and 1.36 xG for UPDF (xG scored 1.60 and xG conceded vs Police 1.12), totaling 2.92 expected goals. With a combined λ=2.92 the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is ~79%, and at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) ~56%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Both teams attempt a similar number of shots (11.77 and 11.73) with shots on target 3.15 and 3.64, and UPDF has a higher conversion rate 9% vs Police 6%, increasing the guests’ likelihood to score. In the last 5 matches Police have scored 6 and conceded 9 (1.2 scored, 1.8 conceded avg.), while UPDF scored 8 and conceded 4 (1.6 and 0.8), further supporting a minimum two-goal scenario. Additionally seasonal Over 0.5 rates are high (Police 77%, UPDF 92%), so I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the most probable and strongest option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I expect a Half-Time draw and an away win (X/2). Hosts were level at the break in 69% of matches and score only 0.15 goals on average by half-time versus 0.67 for the visitors, yielding a combined average of 0.82 goals to the 45th minute — a strong signal for a draw in the first half. After the break the visitors are the favorites: the visitors’ season average goals scored is 1.08 versus 0.69 for the hosts, they have a higher win rate (25% vs 15%) and better shot conversion (9% vs 6%), with similar xG (1.61 hosts vs 1.60 visitors), so they more frequently turn chances into goals in the second half. Additionally, the visitors have scored 21 goals before half-time this season versus 7 for the hosts, demonstrating their ability to produce breakthroughs; at the same time the hosts’ high proportion of clean sheets at half-time (69%) and the league’s high clean sheet rate (77%) keep a realistic probability of a full-time draw, which is why X/X remains the second most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Police UgandaUPDF
10Shots11
Police UgandaUPDF
6Shots on target5
Police UgandaUPDF
1.44xG1.56
Police UgandaUPDF
6Corners9
Police UgandaUPDF
53Dangerous attacks70
Police UgandaUPDF
-1Fouls-1
Police UgandaUPDF
-1Cards-1
Police UgandaUPDF

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.48Goals scored / match0.88
Police UgandaUPDF
1.24Goals conceded / match1.32
Police UgandaUPDF
47%Average possession50%
Police UgandaUPDF
3.96Shots on target / match3.2
Police UgandaUPDF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.32Shots per match11.24
Police UgandaUPDF
3.96Shots on target3.2
Police UgandaUPDF
13.1%Shot conversion7.8%
Police UgandaUPDF
47%Possession50%
Police UgandaUPDF
1.62xG for1.61
Police UgandaUPDF
1.51xG against1.3
Police UgandaUPDF

Shooting quality

Police Uganda: Counter-attackingUPDF: Balanced
Police UgandaUPDF
Accuracy (shots on target)35%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UPDF is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Police Uganda · 1.6 pts / match - UPDF

Police Uganda
LLWWL
Season result split
48% W20% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-8
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
UPDF
DWLWD
Season result split
20% W24% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-14
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Police Uganda is 68% better for: goals scored per match.

1.48 goals / match - Police Uganda · 0.88 goals / match - UPDF

Police Uganda is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Police Uganda · 1.32 goals / match - UPDF

Police Uganda scoring profile: very strong

Police Uganda scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

UPDF scoring profile: strong

UPDF scores in 52% of matches (13 of 25 matches), while Police Uganda keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

37Goals scored (season)22
Police UgandaUPDF
31Goals conceded (season)33
Police UgandaUPDF
2.72Average goals in match2.2
Police UgandaUPDF
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Police UgandaUPDF
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
Police UgandaUPDF

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal52%
Police UgandaUPDF
48%2 goals20%
Police UgandaUPDF
8%3 goals8%
Police UgandaUPDF
4%4 goals4%
Police UgandaUPDF

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal72%
Police UgandaUPDF
32%2 goals36%
Police UgandaUPDF
12%3 goals12%
Police UgandaUPDF
4%4 goals8%
Police UgandaUPDF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time20%
Police UgandaUPDF
0%BTTS in both halves12%
Police UgandaUPDF
16%Scored in both halves20%
Police UgandaUPDF

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Police UgandaUPDF
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Police UgandaUPDF
80%BTTS - last 540%
Police UgandaUPDF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Police UgandaUPDF
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Police UgandaUPDF
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Police UgandaUPDF

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Police UgandaUPDF
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Police UgandaUPDF
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Police UgandaUPDF

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Police Uganda is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Police Uganda · 0.88 pts / match - UPDF

Police Uganda - half-time state
24% leading48% draw28% trailing
UPDF - half-time state
12% leading52% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)0.88
Police UgandaUPDF
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Police UgandaUPDF
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Police UgandaUPDF
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.12
Police UgandaUPDF
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Police UgandaUPDF
52%No goal before half-time72%
Police UgandaUPDF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.12
Police UgandaUPDF
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Police UgandaUPDF
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Police UgandaUPDF
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.08
Police UgandaUPDF
52%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Police UgandaUPDF
48%No goal after half-time56%
Police UgandaUPDF

Police Uganda - second-half results

40% W32% R28% P
30
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UPDF - second-half results

20% W52% R28% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police Uganda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Police Uganda
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
9
4
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
1
46-60
7
4
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
12
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Police Uganda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Police UgandaLigaUPDF
Average goals in match 2.722.09 2.20
Both teams scored 68%39% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%36% 40%
Clean sheets 24%38% 28%
Goal before half-time 68%59% 56%
Goal after half-time 80%60% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Police Uganda 1 - 0 - 0 UPDF. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

UPDF
1 : 2
Police Uganda

FAQ

What was the result of Police Uganda vs UPDF?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Police Uganda 2:0 UPDF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Police Uganda vs UPDF?

Police Uganda score 1.48 goals per game on average and UPDF 0.88. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Police Uganda's matches and 40% of UPDF's.

What form are Police Uganda and UPDF in?

Over the last 5 games Police Uganda have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and UPDF 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Police Uganda vs UPDF?

The statistical background for Police Uganda vs UPDF — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.