Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Police vs APR: match statistics

Police crest
Police
1 : 1half-time 0:0
APR crest
APR
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced contest with an edge for a draw outcome. Police displays solid home form with a 60% win rate at their stadium and conceding just 0.6 goals per match on average, making them a tough opponent on their own ground. APR holds a higher position in the table (2nd place) and has a better overall record (10 wins), but their away form is significantly weaker – only 36% wins and as many as 45% draws on the road. The recent form of both teams is average (Police: 1 pt/match, APR: 1.2 pt/match in the last 5 games), which further supports the draw scenario. Similar xG values (Police 1.17 vs APR 1.12) and possession stats (Police 54% vs APR 55%) confirm the balanced quality of both sides. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' tendency to draw away, the most likely result is a share of the points.

Police vs APR: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Police played APR in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 20 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Police: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. APR: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Police scores 0.95 and concedes 0.47 goals per match. APR scores 1.35 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Police 32%, APR 50%. Over 2.5: Police 21%, APR 45%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

APR has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.15. Police: 6.5 shots per match, APR: 8.2.

Match halves

Police: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.42. APR: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Police: 16-30 (5 goals). APR: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced contest with an edge for a draw outcome. Police displays solid home form with a 60% win rate at their stadium and conceding just 0.6 goals per match on average, making them a tough opponent on their own ground. APR holds a higher position in the table (2nd place) and has a better overall record (10 wins), but their away form is significantly weaker – only 36% wins and as many as 45% draws on the road. The recent form of both teams is average (Police: 1 pt/match, APR: 1.2 pt/match in the last 5 games), which further supports the draw scenario. Similar xG values (Police 1.17 vs APR 1.12) and possession stats (Police 54% vs APR 55%) confirm the balanced quality of both sides. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' tendency to draw away, the most likely result is a share of the points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
PoliceAPR
17Shots13
PoliceAPR
8Shots on target6
PoliceAPR
2.34xG1.88
PoliceAPR
4Corners3
PoliceAPR
96Dangerous attacks87
PoliceAPR
19Fouls11
PoliceAPR
0Cards0
PoliceAPR

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.95Goals scored / match1.35
PoliceAPR
0.47Goals conceded / match0.75
PoliceAPR
53%Average possession54%
PoliceAPR
2.63Shots on target / match2.85
PoliceAPR

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.53Shots per match8.2
PoliceAPR
2.63Shots on target2.85
PoliceAPR
14.5%Shot conversion16.5%
PoliceAPR
53%Possession54%
PoliceAPR
1.15xG for1.24
PoliceAPR
0.82xG against0.93
PoliceAPR

Shooting quality

Police: Efficient finishingAPR: Efficient finishing
PoliceAPR
Accuracy (shots on target)40%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APR is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Police · 1.2 pts / match - APR

Police
WDDLL
Season result split
47% W37% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-3
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
APR
DWDLD
Season result split
50% W40% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-2
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APR is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Police · 1.35 goals / match - APR

Police is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.47 goals / match - Police · 0.75 goals / match - APR

Police scoring profile: mixed

Police scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while APR keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).

APR scoring profile: mixed

APR scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Police keeps a clean sheet in 53% (10 of 19 matches).

18Goals scored (season)27
PoliceAPR
9Goals conceded (season)15
PoliceAPR
1.42Average goals in match2.1
PoliceAPR
5Goals scored (last 5)6
PoliceAPR
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
PoliceAPR

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal75%
PoliceAPR
21%2 goals50%
PoliceAPR
5%3 goals10%
PoliceAPR
5%4 goals0%
PoliceAPR

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal55%
PoliceAPR
0%2 goals15%
PoliceAPR
0%3 goals5%
PoliceAPR
0%4 goals0%
PoliceAPR

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time15%
PoliceAPR
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PoliceAPR
21%Scored in both halves25%
PoliceAPR

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
PoliceAPR
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
PoliceAPR
20%BTTS - last 540%
PoliceAPR

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
PoliceAPR
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
PoliceAPR
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
PoliceAPR

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
PoliceAPR
16%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
PoliceAPR
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PoliceAPR

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Police is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.84 pts / match - Police · 1.75 pts / match - APR

Police - half-time state
42% leading58% draw0% trailing
APR - half-time state
45% leading40% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.84Points per match (1st half)1.75
PoliceAPR
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.8
PoliceAPR
0.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
PoliceAPR
0.58Average goals (1st half)1.2
PoliceAPR
95%Clean sheet before half-time70%
PoliceAPR
53%No goal before half-time45%
PoliceAPR

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.45
PoliceAPR
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
PoliceAPR
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.35
PoliceAPR
0.84Average goals (2nd half)0.9
PoliceAPR
58%Clean sheet after half-time65%
PoliceAPR
63%No goal after half-time55%
PoliceAPR

Police - second-half results

26% W42% R32% P
35
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APR - second-half results

35% W40% R25% P
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
APR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Police
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
4
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

APR
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
9
3
31-45
0
3
46-60
4
0
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.76
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Police

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

APR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

PoliceLigaAPR
Average goals in match 1.422.06 2.10
Both teams scored 32%43% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%34% 45%
Clean sheets 53%35% 45%
Goal before half-time 47%64% 70%
Goal after half-time 68%68% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.06
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.07
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Djibril Cheick Ouattara⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. APRGoalDjibril Cheick Ouattara

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Police 0 - 1 - 0 APR. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Police vs APR?

The National Soccer League match finished Police 1:1 APR. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Police vs APR?

Police score 0.95 goals per game on average and APR 1.35. The National Soccer League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Police's matches and 50% of APR's.

What form are Police and APR in?

Over the last 5 games Police have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and APR 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Police vs APR?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.