Port FC vs Buriram United: match statistics
Port FC vs Buriram United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Port FC play Buriram United in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Port FC: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Buriram United: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Port FC scores 1.97 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Buriram United scores 2.53 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Port FC 40%, Buriram United 60%. Over 2.5: Port FC 47%, Buriram United 70%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Buriram United has higher xG: 1.97 vs 1.68. Port FC: 15.0 shots per match, Buriram United: 16.6.
Match halves
Port FC: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.90. Buriram United: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.47.
Goals by minute
Port FC: 0-15 (14 goals). Buriram United: 76-90+ (22 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Thai League T1: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Port FC averages 2.50 goals scored and concedes only 0.36 goals per home match, with 64% clean sheets and xG for 1.93 versus xG against 1.09, indicating exceptional defensive efficiency and effective chance creation. Buriram United has a better season tally (74 goals scored vs Port’s 52) and higher away possession (60%), but concedes 1.21 goals on average away and has xG for 1.55. In the last 5 matches Port scored 10 goals, won 4 and averages 2.6 points per game, while Buriram scored 7, won 2 and averages only 1.2 points per game, which favors the hosts in form. Port creates more chances at home (7.07 shots on target and 16.93 shots per match) despite a slightly lower conversion rate (15% vs 18% for the visitors), and also has 0% home defeats this season, so I predict a home victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Port FC | Buriram United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Port FC is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Port FC · 1.4 pts / match - Buriram United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buriram United is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.97 goals / match - Port FC · 2.53 goals / match - Buriram United
Port FC is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - Port FC · 1.03 goals / match - Buriram United
Port FC scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Buriram United keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
Buriram United scores in 93% of matches (28 of 30 matches), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 47% (14 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Port FC
Over / Under — Buriram United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Port FC is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.93 pts / match - Port FC · 1.63 pts / match - Buriram United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Port FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Buriram United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Port FC
Buriram United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).
Teams vs league
| Port FC | Liga | Buriram United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.73 | 2.68 | ▲ 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 55% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 47% | 47% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 83% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Port FC 0 - 0 - 1 Buriram United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Port FC vs Buriram United?
The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 3:1 Buriram United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Buriram United?
Port FC score 1.97 goals per game on average and Buriram United 2.53. The Thai League T1 average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Port FC's matches and 60% of Buriram United's.
What form are Port FC and Buriram United in?
Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Buriram United 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Buriram United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.