Port FC vs Buriram United: match statistics
Port FC vs Buriram United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Port FC played Buriram United in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Port FC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Buriram United: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Port FC scores 1.86 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Buriram United scores 2.64 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Port FC 36%, Buriram United 57%. Over 2.5: Port FC 43%, Buriram United 71%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Buriram United has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.66. Port FC: 14.7 shots per match, Buriram United: 16.3.
Match halves
Port FC: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.86. Buriram United: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Port FC: 76-90+ (14 goals). Buriram United: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Thai League T1: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Port FC averages 2.50 goals scored and concedes only 0.36 goals per home match, with 64% clean sheets and xG for 1.93 versus xG against 1.09, indicating exceptional defensive efficiency and effective chance creation. Buriram United has a better season tally (74 goals scored vs Port’s 52) and higher away possession (60%), but concedes 1.21 goals on average away and has xG for 1.55. In the last 5 matches Port scored 10 goals, won 4 and averages 2.6 points per game, while Buriram scored 7, won 2 and averages only 1.2 points per game, which favors the hosts in form. Port creates more chances at home (7.07 shots on target and 16.93 shots per match) despite a slightly lower conversion rate (15% vs 18% for the visitors), and also has 0% home defeats this season, so I predict a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS as more likely: seasonal indicators show BTTS 50% for Port and 64% for Buriram, versus a league average of 55%. Port at home scores an average of 3.0 goals per game (xG 2.35) and registers 8.36 shots on target from 20.0 total shots, while Buriram concede on the road an average of 1.21 goals (xG against 1.07) — this suggests Port has a realistic chance to score. Conversely Buriram average 2.29 goals per game this season and over the last 5 matches generate xG 2.0 and have scored 7 goals (1.4 per game), while Port conceded 4 goals in their last 5 (0.8 per game), indicating the visitors can also find the net. Negative signals include lower BTTS in the last 5 matches at 40% for both teams and the fact Port kept a clean sheet in 43% of home games (i.e. conceded in 57%), whereas Buriram have only 29% clean sheets away (i.e. concede in 71% of away matches). Considering the visitors’ higher seasonal propensity for both teams to score (64% vs 50%) and Port’s offensive edge (3.0 goals and xG 2.35), I assign BTTS 'Yes' 68% vs 'No' 32%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 3.90 (Port 2.35 vs Buriram 1.55), clearly above the 2.5 threshold and close to 3.5, so I expect a high number of goal-scoring opportunities. Port averages 3.0 goals per match this season with 2.35 xG and records 8.36 shots on target, while Buriram averages 2.29 goals with 1.55 xG and 5.07 shots on target — the offensive advantage translates into scoring chances. Season-long over 2.5 rates are 64% for Port and 79% for Buriram (average ~71%), compared to the league at 46%, which strengthens the over 2.5 signal; over 1.5 is virtually guaranteed (93%/86%). In the last 5 matches Port scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 4, while Buriram scored 7 goals (1.4 avg) and conceded 8, which further supports a higher-goal outcome. Based on this, the best line to play appears to be Over 2.5 (strong signal, estimated probability 80%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Port FC led at half-time in 7 matches (50%) and in the last 5 matches were leading in 2 of 5 (40%), while Buriram led at half-time in only 1 of 5 matches (20%). The hosts have a clear attacking quality advantage: average xG 2.35 versus the visitors’ 1.55, on average 20.0 shots and 8.36 shots on target compared to opponents’ 12.57 and 5.07, and they score 1.21 goals by half-time versus Buriram’s 1.07. In the second half Port scores an average of 1.79 goals and concedes only 0.21, with a 79% rate of keeping a second-half clean sheet, which suggests that when leading at the break they often maintain the result. Additionally, Port win 86% of matches season-to-date and have won 80% of their last 5, while Buriram have a 40% win rate in their last 5, so the most probable HT/FT scenario is 1/1 — the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (estimated ~47%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Port FC | Buriram United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Port FC is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Port FC · 2 pts / match - Buriram United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buriram United is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1.86 goals / match - Port FC · 2.64 goals / match - Buriram United
Port FC is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.75 goals / match - Port FC · 0.96 goals / match - Buriram United
Port FC scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Buriram United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).
Buriram United scores in 93% of matches (26 of 28 matches), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (14 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Port FC
Over / Under - Buriram United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Port FC is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / match - Port FC · 1.71 pts / match - Buriram United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Port FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Buriram United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 79%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Port FC
Buriram United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).
Teams vs league
| Port FC | Liga | Buriram United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.61 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 82% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Port FC 0 - 0 - 1 Buriram United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Port FC vs Buriram United?
The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 3:1 Buriram United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Buriram United?
Port FC score 1.86 goals per game on average and Buriram United 2.64. The Thai League T1 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Port FC's matches and 57% of Buriram United's.
What form are Port FC and Buriram United in?
Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Buriram United 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Buriram United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


