Thailand - Thai League T1Data current as of 13 September 2026

Port FC vs Prachuap: match statistics

Port FC crest
Port FC
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Prachuap crest
Prachuap

Port FC vs Prachuap: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Port FC played Prachuap in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Port FC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Prachuap: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Port FC scores 1.92 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Prachuap scores 1.28 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Port FC 40%, Prachuap 56%. Over 2.5: Port FC 44%, Prachuap 36%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Port FC has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.45. Port FC: 14.5 shots per match, Prachuap: 13.4.

Match halves

Port FC: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.88. Prachuap: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Port FC: 76-90+ (13 goals). Prachuap: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Thai League T1: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Port FC as the home side shows a clear edge: at home they average 2.67 goals scored per match and concede only 0.42, while Prachuap average 1.00 scored and 1.50 conceded on the road. Quality of chances also favors Port — home xG is 1.94 versus 1.35 xG for the visitors, and Port registers 7.08 shots on target per match with a 16% conversion rate compared to Prachuap’s 4.08 shots on target and 8% conversion. Defensive metrics underline Port’s superiority: 58% clean sheets at home and only 8% of matches without scoring, whereas Prachuap have 17% clean sheets away and 33% of matches without a goal. In the last 5 matches Port scored 13 and conceded 2 (3 wins, 2 draws), while Prachuap scored 6 and conceded 3 (3 wins, 2 draws), which demonstrates higher attacking efficiency from the hosts. Considering Port’s 0% home defeats, better xG, greater number of shots on target and twice the conversion rate, I expect a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Prachuap has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and BTTS in the last 5 matches of 60%, indicating the away side frequently feature in Goal/Goal games. Port FC at home has BTTS 46% and simultaneously 46% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches they scored 13 goals (avg 2.6) and conceded only 2 goals (avg 0.4), combining offensive firepower with defensive stability. xG analysis shows Port generates xG 1.54 versus xG against Prachuap 1.51, while Prachuap has xG 1.35 versus xG against Port 1.15, meaning both teams have realistic scoring chances. Additionally the league averages 56% BTTS, and the high away BTTS rate (67% vs league 56%) is a strong counterargument against the home side keeping frequent clean sheets. For this reason I recommend BTTS = 'Yes' with confidence 62% vs 38% for 'No' — the main risk is Port's 46% home clean sheets, but Prachuap's stats and xG advantage tilt the pick toward both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Port FC averages 1.54 goals per home match (xG 1.54), while Prachuap records 1.00 goals away (xG 1.35), yielding a combined xG = 2.89 which suggests about 2.9 goals in the game. Port has 69% of home matches Over 1.5, Prachuap 83% of away matches Over 1.5, and the league average is 2.7 goals, so Over 1.5 looks very likely. The 2.5 line is more balanced: season-long Port has 31% of matches Over 2.5, Prachuap 42%, but in the last 5 matches Port scores on average 2.6 goals (13 goals in 5 matches) and Prachuap 1.2 (6 goals), which together with the combined xG 2.89 raises the probability of Over 2.5 to a moderate level. Over 3.5 is unlikely based on season data (Port 23%, Prachuap 25%); the combined xG is below 3.5 and games with that many goals occur only sporadically. The best pick is to play Over 1.5: the high Over 1.5 percentages (69% vs 83%), combined xG 2.89 and Port’s form in the last 5 matches (avg. 2.6 goals) provide the strongest and most reliable signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Port FC is the favorite to lead at the break: the home side were leading at HT in 38% of matches versus 25% for Prachuap. Port scores an average of 0.62 goals by half-time compared to 0.33 for their opponents, has a higher xG (1.54 vs 1.35) and more shots on target (4.85 vs 4.08), which confirms an offensive advantage already in the first half. In the second half the hosts score on average 0.92 goals, while Prachuap concedes on average 1.08 goals after the break; the visitors have conceded as many as 7 goals in minutes 76–90, so an HT lead is often maintained or extended. With Port winning 46% of matches this season versus 17% for Prachuap and given these differences in xG and shots, the strongest scenario is 1/1 (Port leads at half-time and wins the match).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Port FCPrachuap
20Shots10
Port FCPrachuap
10Shots on target4
Port FCPrachuap
2.21xG1.18
Port FCPrachuap
6Corners1
Port FCPrachuap
35Dangerous attacks37
Port FCPrachuap
11Fouls13
Port FCPrachuap
1Cards1
Port FCPrachuap

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.92Goals scored / match1.28
Port FCPrachuap
0.84Goals conceded / match1.2
Port FCPrachuap
52%Average possession47%
Port FCPrachuap
5.4Shots on target / match4.48
Port FCPrachuap

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.52Shots per match13.44
Port FCPrachuap
5.4Shots on target4.48
Port FCPrachuap
13.2%Shot conversion9.5%
Port FCPrachuap
52%Possession47%
Port FCPrachuap
1.65xG for1.45
Port FCPrachuap
1.23xG against1.32
Port FCPrachuap

Shooting quality

Port FC: AttackingPrachuap: Balanced
Port FCPrachuap
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Port FC
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W20% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-6
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-3-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Prachuap
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W48% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-5
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-4
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Port FC is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Port FC · 1.28 goals / match - Prachuap

Port FC is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.84 goals / match - Port FC · 1.2 goals / match - Prachuap

Port FC scoring profile: strong

Port FC scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Prachuap keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).

Prachuap scoring profile: strong

Prachuap scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 matches).

48Goals scored (season)32
Port FCPrachuap
21Goals conceded (season)30
Port FCPrachuap
2.76Average goals in match2.48
Port FCPrachuap
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Port FCPrachuap
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Port FCPrachuap

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal72%
Port FCPrachuap
56%2 goals36%
Port FCPrachuap
28%3 goals12%
Port FCPrachuap
12%4 goals8%
Port FCPrachuap

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal68%
Port FCPrachuap
12%2 goals28%
Port FCPrachuap
8%3 goals12%
Port FCPrachuap
4%4 goals12%
Port FCPrachuap

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time4%
Port FCPrachuap
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Port FCPrachuap
28%Scored in both halves20%
Port FCPrachuap

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Port FCPrachuap
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Port FCPrachuap
40%BTTS - last 560%
Port FCPrachuap

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Port FCPrachuap
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Port FCPrachuap
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Port FCPrachuap

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Port FCPrachuap
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Port FCPrachuap
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
Port FCPrachuap

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Port FC is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / match - Port FC · 1.36 pts / match - Prachuap

Port FC - half-time state
52% leading32% draw16% trailing
Prachuap - half-time state
32% leading40% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per match (1st half)1.36
Port FCPrachuap
1.04Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Port FCPrachuap
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Port FCPrachuap
1.36Average goals (1st half)0.92
Port FCPrachuap
80%Clean sheet before half-time72%
Port FCPrachuap
44%No goal before half-time64%
Port FCPrachuap

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Port FCPrachuap
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Port FCPrachuap
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Port FCPrachuap
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Port FCPrachuap
52%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Port FCPrachuap
52%No goal after half-time44%
Port FCPrachuap

Port FC - second-half results

40% W28% D32% L
47
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Prachuap - second-half results

32% W40% D28% L
34
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Port FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Prachuap - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Port FC
ScoredConceded
12
0
0-15
8
3
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
13
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Prachuap
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
1
1
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
12
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Port FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Prachuap

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).

Teams vs league

Port FCLigaPrachuap
Average goals in match 2.762.70 2.48
Both teams scored 40%56% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%47% 36%
Clean sheets 44%25% 32%
Goal before half-time 68%69% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%82% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PrachuapYellow cardJirapan Phasukihan
  2. PrachuapSubstitutionOn: Iklas SanronOff: Apisit Sorada
  3. PrachuapSubstitutionOn: Jehhanafee MamahOff: Saharat Kanyaroj
  4. Port FCYellow cardPeeradon Chamratsamee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Port FC 1 - 0 - 0 Prachuap. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Port FC vs Prachuap?

The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 3:0 Prachuap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Prachuap?

Port FC score 1.92 goals per game on average and Prachuap 1.28. The Thai League T1 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Port FC's matches and 56% of Prachuap's.

What form are Port FC and Prachuap in?

Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Prachuap 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Prachuap?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.