Portland Hearts of Pine vs Forward Madison: match statistics
Portland Hearts of Pine vs Forward Madison: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portland Hearts of Pine played Forward Madison in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Portland Hearts of Pine: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Forward Madison: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portland Hearts of Pine scores 1.53 and concedes 1.74 goals per match. Forward Madison scores 2.00 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portland Hearts of Pine 74%, Forward Madison 58%. Over 2.5: Portland Hearts of Pine 68%, Forward Madison 58%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Forward Madison has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.46. Portland Hearts of Pine: 12.1 shots per match, Forward Madison: 13.5.
Match halves
Portland Hearts of Pine: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.95. Forward Madison: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.84.
Goals by minute
Portland Hearts of Pine: 76-90+ (10 goals). Forward Madison: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Forward Madison sit 4th, while Portland Hearts of Pine are 11th, and the visitors’ season record stands at 11 wins and just 5 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 5 wins and 8 losses. The difference is particularly evident in their current form: Forward Madison have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 15 goals and conceding 5, whereas Portland have failed to win any of their last five games, scoring 6 and conceding 10. The hosts do have stronger home figures, averaging 1.71 xG and 1.56 goals per match, but their defence allows opponents 1.59 xG and keeps a clean sheet in only 11% of appearances. Madison’s away metrics are less convincing, with an average of 1.10 goals and defeats in 50% of away matches, but their current efficiency and clearly superior results trend support an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is strengthened by the results from the last five matches: Portland conceded an average of 2.0 goals, while Forward Madison scored as many as 3.0 goals per game. Both teams recorded high BTTS rates during this period—80% for the hosts and 60% for the visitors—above the league average of 55%. Forward Madison are in excellent attacking form, scoring 15 goals in five matches and recording an average xG of 1.79, while Portland’s defence allowed opponents an xG of 2.08. The hosts should nevertheless score themselves, as they average 3.25 goals at home this season, generate an xG of 2.01 and produce 6.75 shots on target per match. The risk to the pick is the visitors’ strong recent defensive record, conceding only 1.0 goal per game, but 80% of Portland’s recent matches featuring BTTS support a scenario with goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Forward Madison have averaged 3.0 goals in their last five matches, while Portland have conceded 2.0 goals per game over the same period, clearly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The visitors have created an average of 1.79 xG, while the hosts have allowed opponents 2.08 xG, making their projected total of 1.75 goals justified. Portland are in weaker current form, but over the course of the season they have recorded 2.01 xG and 6.75 shots on target per game, so they should also make a significant offensive contribution. Over 1.5 goals has landed in 100% of the hosts’ matches and in 60% of Forward Madison’s games, while the league average stands at 2.88 goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as even with a more cautious assessment of both teams’ form, the two-goal threshold has by far the highest probability.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Forward Madison are in clearly better current form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Portland have failed to win any and have averaged just 0.4 points per game. The visitors held a lead at the break in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.4 goals before half-time, whereas the hosts managed only 0.33 goals over the same period. Madison have also held the edge after the interval, averaging 1.6 goals and winning the second half in 80% of their recent appearances. Portland’s season-long home figures are very strong, including 3.25 goals scored per match and 8 half-time leads in 8 fixtures, but the hosts’ current downturn in form and the visitors’ momentum provide stronger support for the Forward Madison lead-and-win outcome in the HT/FT market.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Hearts of Pine | Forward Madison | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Forward Madison is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine · 2 pts / match - Forward Madison
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forward Madison is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine · 2 goals / match - Forward Madison
Forward Madison is 66% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.74 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine · 1.05 goals / match - Forward Madison
Portland Hearts of Pine scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Forward Madison keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
Forward Madison scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Portland Hearts of Pine keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Hearts of Pine
Over / Under - Forward Madison
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forward Madison is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine · 2.05 pts / match - Forward Madison
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Hearts of Pine - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Forward Madison - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 58%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portland Hearts of Pine
Forward Madison
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Portland Hearts of Pine | Liga | Forward Madison | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.26 | 2.89 | ▲ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 56% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 25% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 70% | ▲ 95% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 79% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Portland Hearts of Pine 0 - 1 - 1 Forward Madison. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Portland Hearts of Pine vs Forward Madison?
The USL League One match finished Portland Hearts of Pine 1:2 Forward Madison. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Portland Hearts of Pine and Forward Madison?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Portland Hearts of Pine won 0, Forward Madison won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Hearts of Pine vs Forward Madison?
Portland Hearts of Pine score 1.53 goals per game on average and Forward Madison 2.00. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Portland Hearts of Pine's matches and 58% of Forward Madison's.
What form are Portland Hearts of Pine and Forward Madison in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Hearts of Pine have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Forward Madison 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Hearts of Pine vs Forward Madison?
The statistical background for Portland Hearts of Pine vs Forward Madison — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


