United States - MLS Next ProProvidence ParkData current as of 17 October 2026

Portland Timbers II vs Austin II: match statistics

Portland Timbers II vs Austin II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers II played Austin II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Portland Timbers II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Austin II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers II scores 1.38 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Austin II scores 2.00 and concedes 0.79. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers II 38%, Austin II 50%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 54%, Austin II 46%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Portland Timbers II: 13.9 shots per match, Austin II: 13.6.

Match halves

Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00. Austin II: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (10 goals). Austin II: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Austin II lead the table and have won 16 of their 24 matches this season, while Portland Timbers II have recorded 13 wins and 4 defeats. The visitors are particularly solid away from home: they have not lost a single away match, winning 64% of their games and conceding just 0.36 goals per match, while keeping a clean sheet in 64% of fixtures. Portland create more high-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.98 compared with Austin’s 1.68, but this translates into only 1.18 goals per match, and they fail to score in as many as 36% of their home appearances. Austin average 1.82 goals away from home, have a 13% shot conversion rate compared with the hosts’ 7%, and have conceded just 2 goals in their last five matches. Both teams are unbeaten in their last five league rounds, but the visitors’ more consistent defence and clearly superior finishing give them the edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Austin II’s defense, which concedes just 0.36 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 64% of games, compared with 38% for Portland Timbers II. BTTS has landed in only 36% of Austin II’s matches, well below the league average of 62%, while in the last five appearances of both teams, this figure stood at 40% for each side. Portland is highly effective at home, scoring an average of 2.15 goals, so the most realistic No Goal scenario assumes the hosts will score while Austin II fails to respond. Current defensive form further supports this outcome: Portland has conceded 3 goals in its last 5 matches, while Austin has conceded only 2. Although Austin creates chances worth 1.68 xG per match, the solid defensive runs of both teams reduce the likelihood of a Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as Austin II conceded just 0.36 goals per away match during the season and kept a clean sheet in 64% of games. The current form of both defenses also limits the potential for an open contest: Portland Timbers II conceded only 3 goals in their last 5 matches, while Austin II allowed just 2. Despite a season average of 2.15 goals, Portland’s attack scored 1.6 goals per match across its last five appearances, whereas Austin averaged 1.4 goals during that period. The xG figures remain moderate, with the teams’ expected attacking output standing at 1.67 and 1.56 respectively, but the visitors’ solid defense should reduce the hosts’ efficiency. Historically, 54% of Portland’s matches and as many as 82% of Austin’s games finished with fewer than 3.5 goals, supporting a projection of around 2.20 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Austin II win, as Portland were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, while Austin recorded a draw at the break in 60%. Both teams are difficult to surprise before half-time: Portland concede an average of just 0.31 goals by the break, compared with 0.27 for Austin, and the visitors kept a clean sheet at half-time in 73% of their matches. Austin have not lost a match this season, conceding an average of only 0.36 goals per game, and prevented their opponents from scoring in as many as 91% of second halves. Portland are highly dangerous at home, averaging 2.15 goals and winning 69% of their matches, but their recent scoring form has dropped to 1.6 goals per game, increasing the well-organised visitors’ chances of deciding the match after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
19Shots8
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
3Shots on target4
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1.85xG1.29
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1Corners1
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
62Dangerous attacks69
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
11Fouls17
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
2Cards4
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1.38Goals scored / match2
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1.08Goals conceded / match0.79
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
45%Average possession51%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
5.13Shots on target / match5.42
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.88Shots per match13.58
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
5.13Shots on target5.42
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
9.9%Shot conversion14.7%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
45%Possession51%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1.66xG for1.66
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1.38xG against1.38
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers II: BalancedAustin II: Efficient finishing
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
Accuracy (shots on target)37%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers II
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
54% W29% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-4
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Austin II
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W25% D8% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-2
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Austin II is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 2 goals / match - Austin II

Austin II is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 0.79 goals / match - Austin II

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).

Austin II scoring profile: strong

Austin II scores in 96% of matches (23 of 24 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 54% (13 of 24 matches).

33Goals scored (season)48
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
26Goals conceded (season)19
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
2.46Average goals in match2.79
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal96%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
50%2 goals63%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
13%3 goals29%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
0%4 goals13%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal50%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
29%2 goals17%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
21%3 goals8%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
8%4 goals4%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 24 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time8%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
25%Scored in both halves25%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
40%BTTS - last 540%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin II is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.96 pts / match - Austin II

Portland Timbers II - half-time state
17% leading63% draw21% trailing
Austin II - half-time state
54% leading33% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.96
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
0.38Goals scored (1st half)1
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.29
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
63%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
63%No goal before half-time46%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.92Points per match (2nd half)2
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
63%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II
38%No goal after half-time33%
Portland Timbers IIAustin II

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

54% W29% D17% L
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding318%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Austin II - second-half results

58% W25% D17% L
47
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Austin II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
3
4
31-45
7
4
46-60
10
5
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Austin II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
12
2
31-45
5
2
46-60
12
6
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Austin II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Portland Timbers IILigaAustin II
Average goals in match▼ 2.463.31▼ 2.79
Both teams scored▼ 38%62%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 54%66%▼ 46%
Clean sheets▲ 54%21%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 54%77%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%84%• 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Austin IIAssistJules Bery
  2. Austin IIYellow cardDaniel Ciesla
  3. Portland Timbers IISubstitutionOn: Connor FergusonOff: Eric Izoita
  4. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Dren DobrunaOff: Daniel Ciesla
  5. Portland Timbers IIGoalDaniel Cervantes
  6. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Kenan HotOff: Marcel Ruszel
  7. Portland Timbers IISubstitutionOn: Bryce VanvoorhisOff: Noah Santos
  8. Austin IIYellow cardJules Bery
  9. Austin IIRed cardDiego Abarca
  10. Portland Timbers IIRed cardBryce Vanvoorhis
  11. Portland Timbers IIAssistNicklas Lund

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Portland Timbers II 1 - 1 - 0 Austin II. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Austin FC II
1 : 2
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
1 : 1
Austin FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs Austin II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 2:1 Austin II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Austin II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 1, Austin II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Austin II?

Portland Timbers II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Austin II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 50% of Austin II's.

What form are Portland Timbers II and Austin II in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Austin II 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Austin II?

The statistical background for Portland Timbers II vs Austin II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.