Portland Timbers II vs Los Angeles II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Portland Timbers II vs Los Angeles II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portland Timbers II play Los Angeles II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 8 August 2026. Venue: Providence Park.
Current form
Portland Timbers II: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Los Angeles II: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portland Timbers II scores 1.33 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Los Angeles II scores 1.65 and concedes 1.60. League average: 3.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portland Timbers II 38%, Los Angeles II 70%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 52%, Los Angeles II 70%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Los Angeles II has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.67. Portland Timbers II: 14.1 shots per match, Los Angeles II: 14.5.
Match halves
Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.00. Los Angeles II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (9 goals). Los Angeles II: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 20%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers II | Los Angeles II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Portland Timbers II is 117% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.2 pts / match - Los Angeles II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Los Angeles II is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.65 goals / match - Los Angeles II
Portland Timbers II is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.6 goals / match - Los Angeles II
Portland Timbers II scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Los Angeles II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
Los Angeles II scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 52% (11 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Portland Timbers II
Over / Under — Los Angeles II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Los Angeles II is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.15 pts / match - Los Angeles II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Los Angeles II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portland Timbers II
Los Angeles II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers II | Liga | Los Angeles II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.48 | 3.28 | • 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 62% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 66% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 21% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 75% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 84% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Portland Timbers II 3 - 1 - 1 Los Angeles II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 20% matches.
FAQ
When do Portland Timbers II and Los Angeles II play?
Portland Timbers II face Los Angeles II on 8 August 2026 in MLS Next Pro at Providence Park. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Los Angeles II?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 3, Los Angeles II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Los Angeles II?
Portland Timbers II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Los Angeles II 1.65. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 70% of Los Angeles II's.
What form are Portland Timbers II and Los Angeles II in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Los Angeles II 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Los Angeles II?
The statistical background for Portland Timbers II vs Los Angeles II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.