United States - MLS Next ProProvidence ParkData current as of 24 July 2026

Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics

Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers II play San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 22:00. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Portland Timbers II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. San Jose Earthquakes II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers II scores 1.32 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.18 and concedes 1.18. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers II 37%, San Jose Earthquakes II 65%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 53%, San Jose Earthquakes II 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers II has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.63. Portland Timbers II: 14.0 shots per match, San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.5.

Match halves

Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.00. San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.94.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (7 goals). San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 2-2-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 60%.

Match description

I back the home win (1). Portland Timbers II score on average 1.25 goals and concede 1.25 goals per home match, with average xG 2.1 versus xG against 1.4, indicating they create more chances than the opponent. In their last 5 matches Portland have won 3 times and average 1.8 points, and at home they average 18.25 shots (6.88 on target) compared to San Jose’s away averages of 14 shots (4.63 on target). San Jose Earthquakes II, however, are more efficient in finishing (conversion rate 13% vs Portland’s 7%) and average 1.75 goals on the road, but their away defence concedes 1.5 goals with xG against 1.76 and only 13% clean sheets. Considering Portland’s better chance creation and more solid home defence (38% clean sheets and lower xG against 1.4), I expect a narrow home victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
13Shots11
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
4Shots on target4
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.73xG1.37
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
8Corners4
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
86Dangerous attacks56
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
10Fouls12
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
3Cards1
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.32Goals scored / match2.18
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.21Goals conceded / match1.18
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
46%Average possession51%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5.21Shots on target / match5.06
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match13.53
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5.21Shots on target5.06
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
9.4%Shot conversion16.1%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
46%Possession51%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.66xG for1.63
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.38xG against1.56
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers II: AttackingSan Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishing
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers II is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.2 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II
WLWDW
Season result split
53% W26% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-4
1.84 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
San Jose Earthquakes II
LWWLL
Season result split
47% W18% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-6
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 2.18 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: mixed

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 53% (10 of 19 matches).

25Goals scored (season)37
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
23Goals conceded (season)20
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
2.53Average goals in match3.35
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
8Goals scored (last 5)11
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal76%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
47%2 goals53%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11%3 goals41%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0%4 goals24%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal82%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
32%2 goals29%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
26%3 goals6%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11%4 goals0%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

37%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 19 matches
65%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 17 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time29%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11%BTTS in both halves12%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
16%Scored in both halves41%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
40%BTTS - last 560%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 2 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II - half-time state
16% leading58% draw26% trailing
San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
53% leading41% draw6% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)2
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.32Goals scored (1st half)1.24
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.84Average goals (1st half)1.59
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
63%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
68%No goal before half-time29%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.84Points per match (2nd half)1.24
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.76
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
58%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
42%No goal after half-time53%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

53% W26% R21% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding331%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

35% W18% R47% P
34
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 47%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
10
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Portland Timbers IILigaSan Jose Earthquakes II
Average goals in match 2.533.23 3.35
Both teams scored 37%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%65% 65%
Clean sheets 53%22% 18%
Goal before half-time 53%75% 76%
Goal after half-time 74%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Portland Timbers II 2 - 2 - 1 San Jose Earthquakes II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 60% matches.

San Jose Earthquakes II
0 : 1
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
2 : 1
San Jose Earthquakes II
San Jose Earthquakes II
2 : 2
Portland Timbers II
San Jose Earthquakes II
5 : 0
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
1 : 1
San Jose Earthquakes II

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 2:3 San Jose Earthquakes II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and San Jose Earthquakes II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 2, San Jose Earthquakes II won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Portland Timbers II score 1.32 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 2.18. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 65% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.

What form are Portland Timbers II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.