Portland Timbers II vs St. Louis City II: match statistics
Portland Timbers II vs St. Louis City II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portland Timbers II played St. Louis City II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 14 September 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Portland Timbers II: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. St. Louis City II: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portland Timbers II scores 1.35 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. St. Louis City II scores 1.58 and concedes 1.42. League average: 3.34 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portland Timbers II 38%, St. Louis City II 62%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 54%, St. Louis City II 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Portland Timbers II has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.61. Portland Timbers II: 14.2 shots per match, St. Louis City II: 13.3.
Match halves
Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 1.00. St. Louis City II: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.96.
Goals by minute
Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (10 goals). St. Louis City II: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Portland Timbers II sit 2nd, while St. Louis City II are 13th, and the hosts also boast the better season record: 14 wins and just 4 defeats compared with their opponents’ 10 wins and 7 losses. Both teams have remained unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws apiece, but Portland have conceded only 3 goals during that run, compared with 4 conceded by St. Louis. At home, Timbers II create significantly more chances, averaging 17.08 shots and an xG of 1.94, while the visitors average 11.69 shots and an xG of 1.45 away from home. Portland’s home defence concedes an average of 1.08 goals and keeps a clean sheet in 46% of matches, whereas St. Louis concede 1.54 goals per away game. The hosts’ high home draw rate of 46% limits confidence in the pick, but their superior chance creation and more solid defence point towards a narrow Portland victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams record BTTS at 62%, almost identical to the league average of 63%, providing a solid foundation for goals at both ends. Portland score an average of 1.85 goals at home and generate an xG of 1.78, while St. Louis concede an average of 1.54 goals away from home with an xG against of 1.48. The visitors score an average of 1.31 goals and create an xG of 1.45, while Portland’s defence allows 1.31 goals per match, making a goal from St. Louis a realistic possibility as well. Caution is warranted due to Portland’s last five matches, in which BTTS occurred in only 40% of games, with the team conceding just 0.6 goals per match. Despite both defences showing improvement in their short-term form, the season-long attacking figures—5.92 shots on target for Portland and 4.0 for St. Louis—slightly favour the BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Portland average 1.85 goals at home, while St. Louis City II concede 1.54 away from home, giving the hosts a clear basis for scoring at least once. The visitors average 1.31 goals per away match, while Portland concede an average of 1.31, so their contribution to the scoreline is also realistic. The 1.5 line has been covered in 100% of Portland’s matches and 85% of St. Louis City II’s fixtures, while both teams have 62% of matches with goals scored by both sides. However, the last five games have seen both teams show more solid defensive form, conceding 0.6 and 0.8 goals per match respectively, so Over 2.5 goals holds only a moderate edge. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, supported by a projected 2.80 goals and a high frequency of matches going over this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Portland Timbers II have greater attacking potential: they average 1.85 goals with an xG of 1.78, while St. Louis City II average 1.31 goals and an xG of 1.45. The hosts also record an average of 15.0 shots, including 5.92 on target, compared with the visitors’ 11.69 attempts and 4.0 shots on target. Portland held the lead at the break in 31% of matches, while St. Louis did so in only 23%; both teams were level at half-time in as many as 46% of their games, suggesting a closely contested first half. After the interval, Portland’s advantage increases: they average 1.15 goals and win the second half in 46% of matches, whereas the visitors score 0.77 goals and win the second half in 31%. The 1/1 pick is the most likely outcome, as the hosts possess superior chance-creation quality and a more favourable record both in the opening phase and, especially, in the closing stages of the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers II | St. Louis City II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
St. Louis City II is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.35 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.58 goals / match - St. Louis City II
Portland Timbers II is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.42 goals / match - St. Louis City II
Portland Timbers II scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while St. Louis City II keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).
St. Louis City II scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Timbers II
Over / Under - St. Louis City II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
St. Louis City II is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.27 pts / match - St. Louis City II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
St. Louis City II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portland Timbers II
St. Louis City II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers II | Liga | St. Louis City II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.38 | 3.34 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 63% | • 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 67% | ▼ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 21% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 76% | • 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 85% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Portland Timbers II 2 - 0 - 1 St. Louis City II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs St. Louis City II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 1:1 St. Louis City II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and St. Louis City II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 2, St. Louis City II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs St. Louis City II?
Portland Timbers II score 1.35 goals per game on average and St. Louis City II 1.58. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 62% of St. Louis City II's.
What form are Portland Timbers II and St. Louis City II in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and St. Louis City II 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs St. Louis City II?
The statistical background for Portland Timbers II vs St. Louis City II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


