United States - MLS Next ProProvidence ParkData current as of 23 July 2026

Portland Timbers II vs Tacoma Defiance: match statistics

Portland Timbers II vs Tacoma Defiance: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers II play Tacoma Defiance in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 31 May 2026 at 22:00. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Portland Timbers II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tacoma Defiance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers II scores 1.32 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Tacoma Defiance scores 1.21 and concedes 1.37. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers II 37%, Tacoma Defiance 42%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 53%, Tacoma Defiance 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers II has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.36. Portland Timbers II: 14.0 shots per match, Tacoma Defiance: 11.7.

Match halves

Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.00. Tacoma Defiance: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (7 goals). Tacoma Defiance: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 4-0-0. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 75%.

Match description

Portland Timbers II have a clear edge in chance creation — at home they generate 2.19 xG, attempt 19.14 shots and 7.43 shots on target per match, whereas Tacoma Defiance away produce only 1.22 xG, 11.2 shots and 2.4 shots on target. Both teams scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches, but the difference in game organization is visible in defense: Portland concedes 1.43 goals per home match on average, while Tacoma concedes 2.2 on the road. Although Portland have a low shooting conversion rate at home (7%) and fail to score in 43% of games, explaining a high home draw rate (57%), the elevated xG indicates they will create more clear-cut chances. Tacoma suffer 60% losses away and only 20% wins on the road, which reduces their chances of taking full points. Considering the superiority in quality of chances (2.19 vs 1.22 xG, 7.43 vs 2.4 shots on target) and the visitors’ weaker defense (2.2 goals conceded away), I favor a home win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
12Shots10
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
3Shots on target3
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1.5xG1.3
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
6Corners7
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
74Dangerous attacks64
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
12Fouls16
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
3Cards3
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1.32Goals scored / match1.21
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1.21Goals conceded / match1.37
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
46%Average possession45%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
5.21Shots on target / match3.95
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match11.68
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
5.21Shots on target3.95
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
9.4%Shot conversion10.4%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
46%Possession45%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1.66xG for1.36
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1.38xG against1.54
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers II: AttackingTacoma Defiance: Balanced
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers II
WLWDW
Season result split
53% W26% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-4
1.84 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tacoma Defiance
WDLWW
Season result split
37% W21% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-8
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers II is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.21 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance

Portland Timbers II is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.37 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: mixed

Tacoma Defiance scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 53% (10 of 19 matches).

25Goals scored (season)23
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
23Goals conceded (season)26
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
2.53Average goals in match2.58
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
8Goals scored (last 5)8
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal63%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
47%2 goals37%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
11%3 goals11%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
0%4 goals11%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal74%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
32%2 goals47%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
26%3 goals11%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
11%4 goals5%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

37%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 19 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
11%BTTS in both halves16%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
16%Scored in both halves21%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
40%BTTS - last 540%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers II - half-time state
16% leading58% draw26% trailing
Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
16% leading58% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.05
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
0.84Average goals (1st half)0.95
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
63%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
68%No goal before half-time74%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.84Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
58%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance
42%No goal after half-time42%
Portland Timbers IITacoma Defiance

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

53% W26% R21% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding331%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

37% W32% R32% P
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tacoma Defiance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
9
2
46-60
2
8
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Portland Timbers IILigaTacoma Defiance
Average goals in match 2.533.23 2.58
Both teams scored 37%61% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%65% 53%
Clean sheets 53%22% 26%
Goal before half-time 53%75% 53%
Goal after half-time 74%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Portland Timbers II 4 - 0 - 0 Tacoma Defiance. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Tacoma Defiance
0 : 2
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
2 : 1
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
1 : 2
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
2 : 1
Tacoma Defiance

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 1:0 Tacoma Defiance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Tacoma Defiance?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 4, Tacoma Defiance won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Tacoma Defiance?

Portland Timbers II score 1.32 goals per game on average and Tacoma Defiance 1.21. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 42% of Tacoma Defiance's.

What form are Portland Timbers II and Tacoma Defiance in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tacoma Defiance 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Tacoma Defiance?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.