United States - MLSProvidence ParkData current as of 02 September 2026

Portland Timbers vs Minnesota United: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Portland Timbers vs Minnesota United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers play Minnesota United in MLS (United States). The match date is 6 September 2026. Venue: Providence Park.

Current form

Portland Timbers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Minnesota United: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers scores 1.77 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Minnesota United scores 1.36 and concedes 1.45. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers 77%, Minnesota United 64%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers 73%, Minnesota United 55%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.50. Portland Timbers: 12.9 shots per match, Minnesota United: 13.6.

Match halves

Portland Timbers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.95. Minnesota United: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (10 goals). Minnesota United: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.10)
(3.50)
(2.90)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.77Goals scored / match1.36
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.77Goals conceded / match1.45
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
50%Average possession46%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
4.59Shots on target / match5
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.95Shots per match13.55
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
4.59Shots on target5
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
13.7%Shot conversion10.1%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
50%Possession46%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.5xG for1.54
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.9xG against1.41
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers: Efficient finishingMinnesota United: Balanced
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1.2 pts / match - Minnesota United

Portland Timbers
WLWDL
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-10
1.27 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Minnesota United
DDLWD
Season result split
32% W36% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-7
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.77 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.36 goals / match - Minnesota United

Minnesota United is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.77 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.45 goals / match - Minnesota United

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).

39Goals scored (season)30
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
39Goals conceded (season)32
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
3.55Average goals in match2.82
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
8Goals scored (last 5)11
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal77%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
55%2 goals36%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
18%3 goals14%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
9%4 goals5%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal77%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
59%2 goals41%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
18%3 goals14%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
5%4 goals5%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

77%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 22 matches
64%
Minnesota United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time23%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
41%Scored in both halves14%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1 pts / match - Minnesota United

Portland Timbers - half-time state
27% leading23% draw50% trailing
Minnesota United - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.09Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.91Average goals (1st half)1.32
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
23%Clean sheet before half-time36%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
41%No goal before half-time64%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.64Points per match (2nd half)1.55
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United
36%No goal after half-time45%
Portland TimbersMinnesota United

Portland Timbers - second-half results

45% W27% R27% P
23
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Minnesota United - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
5
9
0-15
8
8
16-30
5
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
7
2
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
6
46-60
10
3
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Portland TimbersLigaMinnesota United
Average goals in match 3.553.20 2.82
Both teams scored 77%63% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%62% 55%
Clean sheets 5%21% 23%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 77%
Goal after half-time 82%81% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Portland Timbers 0 - 0 - 1 Minnesota United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do Portland Timbers and Minnesota United play?

Portland Timbers face Minnesota United on 6 September 2026 in MLS at Providence Park. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs Minnesota United?

Portland Timbers score 1.77 goals per game on average and Minnesota United 1.36. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Portland Timbers's matches and 64% of Minnesota United's.

What form are Portland Timbers and Minnesota United in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Minnesota United 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs Minnesota United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.