United States - MLSProvidence ParkData current as of 23 July 2026

Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers play SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 03:30. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Portland Timbers: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. SJ Earthquakes: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers scores 1.81 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. SJ Earthquakes scores 2.13 and concedes 1.19. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers 69%, SJ Earthquakes 56%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers 69%, SJ Earthquakes 63%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

SJ Earthquakes has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.49. Portland Timbers: 12.9 shots per match, SJ Earthquakes: 13.8.

Match halves

Portland Timbers: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.88. SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers: 16-30 (7 goals). SJ Earthquakes: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

I favor Portland (1) primarily due to superior recent metrics over the last five matches: Portland scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per match) with 1.4 points per match, while SJ has only 6 goals (1.2 per match) and 0.4 PPG. At home Portland averages 2.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match, whereas SJ away records 2.14 scored and 1.14 conceded, but SJ conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per match), indicating weakened defensive form. Portland also generates better chances: 4.8 shots on target and 10.6 attempts per home match with a 25% conversion, versus SJ’s 3.43 on target and 9.43 attempts with 23% conversion. Differences in xG are small (Portland xG 1.32 at home vs 1.10 xG for SJ away), but Portland allows higher xG against (1.84 vs 1.66), so I expect an open, high-scoring game (average goals 4.2 for the home side vs 3.29 for the away). Considering 0% FTS for both teams (both regularly score) and the hosts’ better recent form and chance quality, I give them a slight edge and tip a Portland victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
15Shots7
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
7Shots on target6
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.86xG1.2
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
4Corners6
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
57Dangerous attacks45
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
10Fouls14
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1Cards4
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.81Goals scored / match2.13
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.94Goals conceded / match1.19
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
51%Average possession47%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
4.75Shots on target / match5.69
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.88Shots per match13.81
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
4.75Shots on target5.69
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
14.1%Shot conversion15.4%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
51%Possession47%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.49xG for1.58
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.97xG against1.42
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers: Efficient finishingSJ Earthquakes: Counter-attacking
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 0.8 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers
DLLWD
Season result split
31% W19% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
SJ Earthquakes
DLLWL
Season result split
63% W13% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.81 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 2.13 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

SJ Earthquakes is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.94 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.19 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers scoring profile: strong

Portland Timbers scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: very strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

29Goals scored (season)34
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
31Goals conceded (season)19
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
3.75Average goals in match3.31
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
10Goals conceded (last 5)12
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal88%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
56%2 goals63%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
19%3 goals44%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
13%4 goals13%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal69%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
69%2 goals25%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
25%3 goals19%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
6%4 goals6%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

69%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 16 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time31%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0%BTTS in both halves13%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
44%Scored in both halves38%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
80%BTTS - last 580%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1.69 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers - half-time state
31% leading19% draw50% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.69
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0.94Goals scored (1st half)1
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
2.06Average goals (1st half)1.56
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
38%No goal before half-time31%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
50%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
44%No goal after half-time44%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers - second-half results

38% W31% R31% P
18
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match1.60.4
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-5+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.20
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Portland TimbersLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals in match 3.753.30 3.31
Both teams scored 69%62% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%63% 63%
Clean sheets 6%21% 31%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 88%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes?

The MLS match finished Portland Timbers 1:3 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes?

Portland Timbers score 1.81 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 2.13. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Portland Timbers's matches and 56% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Portland Timbers and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes?

The statistical background for Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.