United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: match statistics

Portland Timbers crest
Portland Timbers
6 : 0half-time 4:0
Sporting KC crest
Sporting KC

Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers play Sporting KC in MLS (United States). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 04:30. Final score: 6:0.

Current form

Portland Timbers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Sporting KC: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers scores 1.80 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. Sporting KC scores 1.07 and concedes 2.60. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers 67%, Sporting KC 67%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers 67%, Sporting KC 87%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.15. Portland Timbers: 12.7 shots per match, Sporting KC: 9.5.

Match halves

Portland Timbers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80. Sporting KC: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers: 16-30 (7 goals). Sporting KC: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Portland Timbers have a clear offensive edge: they average 1.75 goals per home match, while Sporting KC score just 0.6 goals on the road, a difference of 1.15 goals per game. The hosts average 9.25 shots and 4.5 on target per home match with a 19% conversion rate, whereas Sporting averages only 5.6 shots and 1.8 on target away with an 11% conversion; the hosts’ xG is 1.19 versus the visitors’ 0.71, confirming superior quality of created chances. Defensively Portland concede 2.0 goals on average at home, while Sporting concede 3.0 goals away; in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 goals and won 2 games (1.2 points per match), whereas the visitors scored 2 goals, registered no wins and have only 0.2 points per match. Additionally, Sporting failed to score in 60% of their away matches and conceded 15 goals in their last 5 matches versus Portland’s 9, with the visitors’ away goal difference at -12 compared to the hosts’ -1, underlining greater defensive issues for the traveling side. Based on this I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 72% for Portland, 18% for a draw and 10% for an upset by Sporting KC.

Half-by-half

4 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Portland TimbersSporting KC
16Shots11
Portland TimbersSporting KC
6Shots on target3
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.81xG1.19
Portland TimbersSporting KC
4Corners4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
52Dangerous attacks40
Portland TimbersSporting KC
11Fouls20
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1Cards5
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.8Goals scored / match1.07
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.93Goals conceded / match2.6
Portland TimbersSporting KC
50%Average possession45%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
4.8Shots on target / match3.93
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.67Shots per match9.47
Portland TimbersSporting KC
4.8Shots on target3.93
Portland TimbersSporting KC
14.2%Shot conversion11.3%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
50%Possession45%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.46xG for1.15
Portland TimbersSporting KC
2.01xG against1.86
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers: Efficient finishingSporting KC: Balanced
Portland TimbersSporting KC
Accuracy (shots on target)38%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1.2 pts / match - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers
WDLLW
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Sporting KC
LWWLL
Season result split
20% W13% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-10
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-6
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 68% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.07 goals / match - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.93 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 2.6 goals / match - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Sporting KC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 15 matches).

Sporting KC scoring profile: very strong

Sporting KC scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

27Goals scored (season)16
Portland TimbersSporting KC
29Goals conceded (season)39
Portland TimbersSporting KC
3.73Average goals in match3.67
Portland TimbersSporting KC
14Goals scored (last 5)8
Portland TimbersSporting KC
8Goals conceded (last 5)13
Portland TimbersSporting KC

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal67%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
53%2 goals33%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
20%3 goals7%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
13%4 goals0%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal100%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
67%2 goals67%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
27%3 goals53%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
7%4 goals20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 15 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time27%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
47%Scored in both halves20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
60%BTTS - last 580%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 0.6 pts / match - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers - half-time state
33% leading20% draw47% trailing
Sporting KC - half-time state
13% leading20% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)0.6
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.13Goals conceded (1st half)1.4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
2.13Average goals (1st half)1.87
Portland TimbersSporting KC
27%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
33%No goal before half-time60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Portland TimbersSporting KC
53%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
47%No goal after half-time53%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Portland Timbers - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
18
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sporting KC - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
9
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.2
Average goals in match2.81.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Sporting KC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.80.8
Average goals in match2.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-6+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Sporting KC
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
2
5
16-30
5
9
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
7
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Sporting KC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Portland TimbersLigaSporting KC
Average goals in match 3.733.30 3.67
Both teams scored 67%61% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 87%
Clean sheets 7%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 93%
Goal after half-time 73%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?

The MLS match finished Portland Timbers 6:0 Sporting KC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?

Portland Timbers score 1.80 goals per game on average and Sporting KC 1.07. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Portland Timbers's matches and 67% of Sporting KC's.

What form are Portland Timbers and Sporting KC in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sporting KC 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.