Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City: match statistics
Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portland Timbers played St. Louis City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 10 September 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Portland Timbers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. St. Louis City: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portland Timbers scores 1.91 and concedes 1.87 goals per match. St. Louis City scores 1.57 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portland Timbers 78%, St. Louis City 70%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers 74%, St. Louis City 48%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
St. Louis City has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.49. Portland Timbers: 12.9 shots per match, St. Louis City: 13.7.
Match halves
Portland Timbers: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.00. St. Louis City: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Portland Timbers: 16-30 (10 goals). St. Louis City: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Portland Timbers are significantly more effective at home, where they average 2.18 goals per match, while St. Louis City score just 1.09 goals away from home. The hosts win 55% of their home fixtures and have not been held scoreless, whereas the visitors win only 27% of their away matches and fail to score in 27% of away games. Portland also create more in the final third: they average 13.09 shots and 5.09 shots on target per match, compared with 12.36 and 3.91 for St. Louis. However, the visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, drawing three of them, so their current stability, combined with Portland conceding an average of 1.64 goals at home, increases the likelihood of a closely contested game. Nevertheless, home advantage and the Timbers’ much greater attacking consistency point to a narrow victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear, as BTTS has occurred in 73% of Portland’s matches and 64% of St. Louis’ matches this season, compared with the league average of 62%. Both teams are on a five-match BTTS streak, scoring an average of 1.8 and 2.0 goals respectively during this period, while conceding 1.4 goals each. Portland scores an average of 1.91 goals at home, while St. Louis averages 1.09 goals per match, with the visitors failing to score in only 9% of their games. The defenses provide little basis for expecting clean sheets: the hosts have kept one in 18% of matches, and the visitors in just 9%, with xG against figures of 1.18 and 1.45. Portland should consistently create chances, averaging 1.76 xG and 5.09 shots on target, while St. Louis’ strong recent finishing increases the likelihood of a goal from the visitors. Therefore, the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal market is the preferred selection, rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score—it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Portland score an average of 1.91 goals at home, while St. Louis concede 1.45 goals away, clearly supporting a goal-scoring scenario for the hosts. The xG model also points to opportunities: Portland generate an average of 1.76 xG, while the visitors record 1.36 xG, with Portland’s defense allowing opponents 1.18 xG. In their last five matches, both teams scored an average of 1.8 and 2.0 goals per game respectively, and each had both teams scoring in 100% of those matches. At least 2 goals were scored in 82% of Portland’s matches and as many as 91% of St. Louis’ games, making Over 1.5 goals by far the strongest data-backed option. The 2.5 line remains realistic, but St. Louis have recorded Over 2.5 goals in only 27% of their away matches this season, so Over 1.5 offers the safer edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Portland win, as the hosts average 1.91 goals per match compared with St. Louis’s 1.09 and have the higher xG: 1.76 versus the visitors’ 1.36. The first half could nevertheless be closely contested: St. Louis were level at the break in 45% of their away matches, while in their last five games they were leading after 45 minutes in as many as 80% of cases. Portland have the stronger argument after the break, averaging 1.09 goals in the second half, while the visitors concede 1.18 goals during that period. In their last five matches, the hosts won the second half in 60% of cases, whereas St. Louis have not won any second half and averaged just 0.8 goals scored in those periods. Portland’s advantage across the season, including a 55% win rate compared with the visitors’ 27%, supports the scenario of a draw turning in the hosts’ favour after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers | St. Louis City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
St. Louis City is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 2.2 pts / match - St. Louis City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Portland Timbers is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.91 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.57 goals / match - St. Louis City
St. Louis City is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.87 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.35 goals / match - St. Louis City
Portland Timbers scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while St. Louis City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).
St. Louis City scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Timbers
Over / Under - St. Louis City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
St. Louis City is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1.83 pts / match - St. Louis City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
St. Louis City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 43%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portland Timbers
St. Louis City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers | Liga | St. Louis City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.78 | 3.21 | ▼ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 64% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 74% | 62% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 21% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City?
The MLS match finished Portland Timbers 2:2 St. Louis City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City?
Portland Timbers score 1.91 goals per game on average and St. Louis City 1.57. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Portland Timbers's matches and 70% of St. Louis City's.
What form are Portland Timbers and St. Louis City in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and St. Louis City 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City?
The statistical background for Portland Timbers vs St. Louis City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


