England - ChampionshipData current as of 13 September 2026

Portsmouth vs Birmingham City: match statistics

Portsmouth crest
Portsmouth
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Birmingham City crest
Birmingham City

Portsmouth vs Birmingham City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portsmouth played Birmingham City in Championship (England). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Portsmouth: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Birmingham City: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portsmouth scores 1.07 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Birmingham City scores 1.24 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portsmouth 53%, Birmingham City 56%. Over 2.5: Portsmouth 44%, Birmingham City 47%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Birmingham City has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.37. Portsmouth: 12.2 shots per match, Birmingham City: 13.6.

Match halves

Portsmouth: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.67. Birmingham City: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Portsmouth: 76-90+ (13 goals). Birmingham City: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Portsmouth are favorites in this matchup due to superior home metrics: on average 15.5 shots and 4.5 shots on target per home game versus Birmingham’s 9.77 shots and 2.5 on target away. The hosts score 1.09 goals per home game with an xG of 1.68, while the visitors produce only 0.77 goals away with an xG of 1.11, indicating a quality-situation advantage for Portsmouth (xG difference 0.57). Defensively Portsmouth concede 1.00 goal per home game versus Birmingham’s 1.5 goals conceded away; the hosts also record 27% clean sheets compared to 14% for the visitors and have a lower share of matches without scoring (32% vs 41%). Form supports this — Portsmouth have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 points per game in that period, while Birmingham have 3 wins and average 2.0 points per game; additionally Portsmouth’s home goal difference is +2 versus Birmingham’s away goal difference of -16. In summary, I expect a Portsmouth win, estimating probabilities at approximately: Portsmouth 58%, Draw 22%, Birmingham 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because Portsmouth have a seasonal BTTS rate of 65% with average goals scored 1.7 and conceded 0.96, and their season offensive xG is 1.89 versus Birmingham’s defensive xG conceded 1.41, suggesting the home side will create chances. However, Portsmouth’s last 5 matches show BTTS only 40% and an offensive xG of 0.96, which reduces confidence in this scenario. Birmingham away this season score 0.77 and concede 1.5, but in their last five matches they have 80% BTTS, average 1.6 goals and offensive xG 1.58, and both teams scored 8 goals in those five fixtures. Considering Portsmouth’s 65% seasonal BTTS, Birmingham’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, league-wide BTTS level of 56%, and the home advantage in shots and xG, I assess the probability at 68% for Yes and 32% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Season-long analysis shows Portsmouth matches finished Over 1.5 goals in 78% of cases, and Birmingham in 77% — an average of 77.5%, which strongly favors Over 1.5. xG models indicate home xG 1.89 and away xG 1.11, while defenses concede 1.05 (Portsmouth) and 1.41 (Birmingham); the average of these values yields a forecast of 1.65 goals for Portsmouth and 1.08 for Birmingham, total 2.73. Portsmouth averages 17.3 shots and 5.65 on target with a 10% conversion (roughly 1.73 goals), whereas Birmingham has 9.77 shots and 2.5 on target with an 8% conversion, which supports the home advantage but does not exclude away goals. Season shares for Over 2.5 are 48% (Portsmouth) and 45% (Birmingham), averaging 46.5%; however, considering the xG total of 2.73 and the last 5 matches (last 5: Over 2.5 = 40% for the home side and 60% for the away), I give a slight edge to Over 2.5 (~52%). In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (78% probability), hence the recommendation to back the "over" at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Portsmouth holds a clear attacking advantage: they average 1.7 goals per game versus Birmingham's 0.77; the home side's xG is 1.89 compared to 1.11 for the visitors, and 5.65 shots on target vs 2.5, which demonstrates the quality of created chances. At half-time Portsmouth led in 11 matches (48%) while Birmingham led only 3 times (14%), and the visitors were trailing at the break in 16 fixtures (73%), so the break tends to favor the home side. Portsmouth win 52% of matches, concede on average 0.96 goals per game versus Birmingham's 1.5, and after the break score on average 0.74 goals, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. On this basis the most reliable signal is 1/1 (I rate at 38%), and secondary options are a draw at half-time with a home win by full-time (X/1 19%) or a draw/draw (X/X 16%), while Birmingham comebacks are rated much lower due to lower xG and fewer chances.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
PortsmouthBirmingham City
14Shots13
PortsmouthBirmingham City
2Shots on target5
PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.29xG1.47
PortsmouthBirmingham City
3Corners9
PortsmouthBirmingham City
37Dangerous attacks42
PortsmouthBirmingham City
19Fouls10
PortsmouthBirmingham City
2Cards2
PortsmouthBirmingham City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.07Goals scored / match1.24
PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.4Goals conceded / match1.22
PortsmouthBirmingham City
50%Average possession54%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
3.71Shots on target / match4.11
PortsmouthBirmingham City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.18Shots per match13.62
PortsmouthBirmingham City
3.71Shots on target4.11
PortsmouthBirmingham City
8.8%Shot conversion9.1%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
50%Possession54%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.37xG for1.51
PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.32xG against1.23
PortsmouthBirmingham City

Shooting quality

Portsmouth: BalancedBirmingham City: Balanced
PortsmouthBirmingham City
Accuracy (shots on target)30%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portsmouth is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Portsmouth · 2 pts / match - Birmingham City

Portsmouth
WWWLW
Season result split
31% W27% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-12-19
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-9
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Birmingham City
LWDWW
Season result split
38% W27% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-12-16
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-13
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Birmingham City is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Portsmouth · 1.24 goals / match - Birmingham City

Birmingham City is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Portsmouth · 1.22 goals / match - Birmingham City

Portsmouth scoring profile: very strong

Portsmouth scores in 71% of matches (32 of 45 matches), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 45 matches).

Birmingham City scoring profile: very strong

Birmingham City scores in 76% of matches (34 of 45 matches), while Portsmouth keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 45 matches).

48Goals scored (season)56
PortsmouthBirmingham City
63Goals conceded (season)55
PortsmouthBirmingham City
2.47Average goals in match2.47
PortsmouthBirmingham City
8Goals scored (last 5)8
PortsmouthBirmingham City
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
PortsmouthBirmingham City

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal76%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
24%2 goals33%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
11%3 goals9%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
0%4 goals7%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
31%2 goals29%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
13%3 goals16%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
9%4 goals0%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time20%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
0%BTTS in both halves7%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
13%Scored in both halves18%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
40%BTTS - last 580%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Birmingham City is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Portsmouth · 1.2 pts / match - Birmingham City

Portsmouth - half-time state
24% leading36% draw40% trailing
Birmingham City - half-time state
31% leading27% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.2
PortsmouthBirmingham City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.62
PortsmouthBirmingham City
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.02Average goals (1st half)1.36
PortsmouthBirmingham City
56%Clean sheet before half-time44%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
69%No goal before half-time56%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.36
PortsmouthBirmingham City
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
PortsmouthBirmingham City
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.49
PortsmouthBirmingham City
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.11
PortsmouthBirmingham City
49%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PortsmouthBirmingham City
47%No goal after half-time51%
PortsmouthBirmingham City

Portsmouth - second-half results

36% W33% D31% L
49
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Birmingham City - second-half results

31% W42% D27% L
54
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portsmouth - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Birmingham City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portsmouth
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
5
11
16-30
9
8
31-45
8
14
46-60
9
8
61-75
13
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Birmingham City
ScoredConceded
10
9
0-15
10
12
16-30
8
12
31-45
9
8
46-60
8
7
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portsmouth

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Birmingham City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

PortsmouthLigaBirmingham City
Average goals in match 2.472.60 2.47
Both teams scored 53%57% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%50% 47%
Clean sheets 22%25% 22%
Goal before half-time 69%71% 80%
Goal after half-time 78%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PortsmouthGoalAdrian SegečićAssist: Jordan Williams
  2. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Seung-Ho PaikOff: Jay Stansfield
  3. Birmingham CityGoalAugust PriskeAssist: Kai Wagner
  4. PortsmouthSubstitutionOn: Conor ChaplinOff: John Swift
  5. PortsmouthYellow cardLuke Le Roux
  6. PortsmouthSubstitutionOn: Regan Leslie PooleOff: Connor Stuart Ogilvie
  7. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Thomas DoyleOff: Jhon Elmer Solis Romero
  8. Birmingham CityYellow cardCarlos Vicente Robles
  9. PortsmouthYellow cardAdrian Segečić
  10. Birmingham CityYellow cardBright Osayi-Samuel
  11. PortsmouthSubstitutionOn: Marlon PackOff: Luke Le Roux

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Portsmouth 0 - 0 - 1 Birmingham City. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Birmingham City FC
4 : 0
Portsmouth FC

FAQ

What was the result of Portsmouth vs Birmingham City?

The Championship match finished Portsmouth 1:1 Birmingham City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portsmouth vs Birmingham City?

Portsmouth score 1.07 goals per game on average and Birmingham City 1.24. The Championship average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Portsmouth's matches and 56% of Birmingham City's.

What form are Portsmouth and Birmingham City in?

Over the last 5 games Portsmouth have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Birmingham City 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portsmouth vs Birmingham City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portsmouth vs Birmingham City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.