Portsmouth vs Birmingham City: match statistics
Portsmouth vs Birmingham City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portsmouth played Birmingham City in Championship (England). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Portsmouth: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Birmingham City: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portsmouth scores 1.07 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Birmingham City scores 1.24 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portsmouth 53%, Birmingham City 56%. Over 2.5: Portsmouth 44%, Birmingham City 47%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Birmingham City has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.37. Portsmouth: 12.2 shots per match, Birmingham City: 13.6.
Match halves
Portsmouth: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.67. Birmingham City: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Portsmouth: 76-90+ (13 goals). Birmingham City: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Portsmouth are favorites in this matchup due to superior home metrics: on average 15.5 shots and 4.5 shots on target per home game versus Birmingham’s 9.77 shots and 2.5 on target away. The hosts score 1.09 goals per home game with an xG of 1.68, while the visitors produce only 0.77 goals away with an xG of 1.11, indicating a quality-situation advantage for Portsmouth (xG difference 0.57). Defensively Portsmouth concede 1.00 goal per home game versus Birmingham’s 1.5 goals conceded away; the hosts also record 27% clean sheets compared to 14% for the visitors and have a lower share of matches without scoring (32% vs 41%). Form supports this — Portsmouth have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 points per game in that period, while Birmingham have 3 wins and average 2.0 points per game; additionally Portsmouth’s home goal difference is +2 versus Birmingham’s away goal difference of -16. In summary, I expect a Portsmouth win, estimating probabilities at approximately: Portsmouth 58%, Draw 22%, Birmingham 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because Portsmouth have a seasonal BTTS rate of 65% with average goals scored 1.7 and conceded 0.96, and their season offensive xG is 1.89 versus Birmingham’s defensive xG conceded 1.41, suggesting the home side will create chances. However, Portsmouth’s last 5 matches show BTTS only 40% and an offensive xG of 0.96, which reduces confidence in this scenario. Birmingham away this season score 0.77 and concede 1.5, but in their last five matches they have 80% BTTS, average 1.6 goals and offensive xG 1.58, and both teams scored 8 goals in those five fixtures. Considering Portsmouth’s 65% seasonal BTTS, Birmingham’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, league-wide BTTS level of 56%, and the home advantage in shots and xG, I assess the probability at 68% for Yes and 32% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Season-long analysis shows Portsmouth matches finished Over 1.5 goals in 78% of cases, and Birmingham in 77% — an average of 77.5%, which strongly favors Over 1.5. xG models indicate home xG 1.89 and away xG 1.11, while defenses concede 1.05 (Portsmouth) and 1.41 (Birmingham); the average of these values yields a forecast of 1.65 goals for Portsmouth and 1.08 for Birmingham, total 2.73. Portsmouth averages 17.3 shots and 5.65 on target with a 10% conversion (roughly 1.73 goals), whereas Birmingham has 9.77 shots and 2.5 on target with an 8% conversion, which supports the home advantage but does not exclude away goals. Season shares for Over 2.5 are 48% (Portsmouth) and 45% (Birmingham), averaging 46.5%; however, considering the xG total of 2.73 and the last 5 matches (last 5: Over 2.5 = 40% for the home side and 60% for the away), I give a slight edge to Over 2.5 (~52%). In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (78% probability), hence the recommendation to back the "over" at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Portsmouth holds a clear attacking advantage: they average 1.7 goals per game versus Birmingham's 0.77; the home side's xG is 1.89 compared to 1.11 for the visitors, and 5.65 shots on target vs 2.5, which demonstrates the quality of created chances. At half-time Portsmouth led in 11 matches (48%) while Birmingham led only 3 times (14%), and the visitors were trailing at the break in 16 fixtures (73%), so the break tends to favor the home side. Portsmouth win 52% of matches, concede on average 0.96 goals per game versus Birmingham's 1.5, and after the break score on average 0.74 goals, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. On this basis the most reliable signal is 1/1 (I rate at 38%), and secondary options are a draw at half-time with a home win by full-time (X/1 19%) or a draw/draw (X/X 16%), while Birmingham comebacks are rated much lower due to lower xG and fewer chances.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portsmouth | Birmingham City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Portsmouth is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Portsmouth · 2 pts / match - Birmingham City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Birmingham City is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - Portsmouth · 1.24 goals / match - Birmingham City
Birmingham City is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Portsmouth · 1.22 goals / match - Birmingham City
Portsmouth scores in 71% of matches (32 of 45 matches), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 45 matches).
Birmingham City scores in 76% of matches (34 of 45 matches), while Portsmouth keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 45 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portsmouth
Over / Under - Birmingham City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Birmingham City is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Portsmouth · 1.2 pts / match - Birmingham City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portsmouth - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Birmingham City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portsmouth
Birmingham City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Portsmouth | Liga | Birmingham City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.60 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 57% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 25% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Portsmouth 0 - 0 - 1 Birmingham City. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Portsmouth vs Birmingham City?
The Championship match finished Portsmouth 1:1 Birmingham City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Portsmouth vs Birmingham City?
Portsmouth score 1.07 goals per game on average and Birmingham City 1.24. The Championship average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Portsmouth's matches and 56% of Birmingham City's.
What form are Portsmouth and Birmingham City in?
Over the last 5 games Portsmouth have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Birmingham City 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portsmouth vs Birmingham City?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portsmouth vs Birmingham City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


