Portsmouth vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portsmouth played Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match was played on 26 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Portsmouth: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portsmouth scores 0.86 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.45 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portsmouth 48%, Queens Park Rangers 73%. Over 2.5: Portsmouth 43%, Queens Park Rangers 64%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.30. Portsmouth: 11.9 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 13.4.

Match halves

Portsmouth: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.48. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Portsmouth: 76-90+ (6 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
8Shots8
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
2Shots on target3
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1.22xG1
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
9Corners3
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
77Dangerous attacks39
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
9Fouls14
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1Cards2
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0.86Goals scored / match1.45
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1.33Goals conceded / match1.55
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
49%Average possession47%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
3.52Shots on target / match4.09
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.9Shots per match13.41
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
3.52Shots on target4.09
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
7.2%Shot conversion10.8%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
49%Possession47%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1.3xG for1.47
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1.45xG against1.35
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

Shooting quality

Portsmouth: BalancedQueens Park Rangers: Balanced
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)30%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Queens Park Rangers is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Portsmouth · 1.8 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Portsmouth
LLLWD
Season result split
24% W29% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Queens Park Rangers
LWWLW
Season result split
45% W18% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-8
1.55 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queens Park Rangers is 69% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Portsmouth · 1.45 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Portsmouth is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Portsmouth · 1.55 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Portsmouth scoring profile: strong

Portsmouth scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Queens Park Rangers scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Portsmouth keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

18Goals scored (season)32
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
28Goals conceded (season)34
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
2.19Average goals in match3
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
3Goals scored (last 5)11
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal86%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
19%2 goals32%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
5%3 goals23%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0%4 goals5%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal77%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
38%2 goals36%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
14%3 goals18%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
5%4 goals9%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

73%
Queens Park Rangers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 22 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time18%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0%BTTS in both halves5%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
10%Scored in both halves23%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
40%BTTS - last 5100%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Queens Park Rangers is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Portsmouth · 1.27 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Portsmouth - half-time state
24% leading29% draw48% trailing
Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
32% leading32% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.27
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.68
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.55
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
43%Clean sheet before half-time55%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
67%No goal before half-time50%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.5
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.45
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
57%Clean sheet after half-time50%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers
62%No goal after half-time41%
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers

Portsmouth - second-half results

29% W38% D33% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

36% W41% D23% L
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portsmouth - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Queens Park Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match2.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portsmouth
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
1
4
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
6
16-30
9
9
31-45
3
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portsmouth

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

PortsmouthLigaQueens Park Rangers
Average goals in match 2.192.63 3.00
Both teams scored 48%59% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%51% 64%
Clean sheets 24%23% 23%
Goal before half-time 81%74% 77%
Goal after half-time 67%78% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PortsmouthGoalTerry Devlin
  2. PortsmouthSubstitutionOn: Adrian SegečićOff: Harvey Blair
  3. Queens Park RangersGoalJimmy DunneAssist: Nicolas Martin Hautorp Madsen
  4. PortsmouthYellow cardAdrian Segečić
  5. PortsmouthSubstitutionOn: Marlon PackOff: Márk Kosznovszky
  6. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Michael FreyOff: Richard Kone
  7. PortsmouthSubstitutionOn: Min-Hyuk YangOff: Conor Chaplin
  8. Queens Park RangersYellow cardIsaac Hayden
  9. Queens Park RangersYellow cardRhys Norrington-Davies
  10. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Sam FieldOff: Rhys Norrington-Davies

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

James LiningtonMatches officiated: 17
3.47Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 265%Home wins12%Draws24%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Portsmouth vs Queens Park Rangers?

The Championship match finished Portsmouth 1:1 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portsmouth vs Queens Park Rangers?

Portsmouth score 0.86 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.45. The Championship average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Portsmouth's matches and 73% of Queens Park Rangers's.

What form are Portsmouth and Queens Park Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Portsmouth have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portsmouth vs Queens Park Rangers?

The statistical background for Portsmouth vs Queens Park Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.