Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Posta Rangers vs Police: match statistics

Posta Rangers crest
Posta Rangers
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Police crest
Police
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Police FC presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The guests have a record of 9 wins, 10 draws, and only 4 losses, while Posta Rangers have won just 5 matches with 8 losses. In away matches, Police achieves an impressive 55% win rate and 45% clean sheets, conceding an average of only 0.73 goals per match. The form of the last five meetings also speaks for the guests – Police earned 1.4 points per match compared to just 0.4 points for Posta Rangers. The hosts additionally struggle with efficiency – a low xG conversion rate (0.71) and 27% of matches without scoring at home. The difference in quality of play, possession (51% vs 46%), and shots on goal (4.7 vs 3.55) clearly favors the Police team. Considering all these factors, a victory for the guests is the most likely scenario, although Police's solid defense could also lead to a draw.

Posta Rangers vs Police: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Posta Rangers play Police in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Posta Rangers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Police: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Posta Rangers scores 0.83 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Police scores 0.97 and concedes 0.62. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Posta Rangers 45%, Police 31%. Over 2.5: Posta Rangers 34%, Police 21%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Police has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.23. Posta Rangers: 8.7 shots per match, Police: 12.4.

Match halves

Posta Rangers: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.14. Police: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Posta Rangers: 0-15 (14 goals). Police: 0-15 (27 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Police FC presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The guests have a record of 9 wins, 10 draws, and only 4 losses, while Posta Rangers have won just 5 matches with 8 losses. In away matches, Police achieves an impressive 55% win rate and 45% clean sheets, conceding an average of only 0.73 goals per match. The form of the last five meetings also speaks for the guests – Police earned 1.4 points per match compared to just 0.4 points for Posta Rangers. The hosts additionally struggle with efficiency – a low xG conversion rate (0.71) and 27% of matches without scoring at home. The difference in quality of play, possession (51% vs 46%), and shots on goal (4.7 vs 3.55) clearly favors the Police team. Considering all these factors, a victory for the guests is the most likely scenario, although Police's solid defense could also lead to a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Posta RangersPolice
7Shots3
Posta RangersPolice
4Shots on target1
Posta RangersPolice
1.12xG0.84
Posta RangersPolice
3Corners4
Posta RangersPolice
55Dangerous attacks79
Posta RangersPolice
-1Fouls-1
Posta RangersPolice
-1Cards-1
Posta RangersPolice

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Posta RangersPolice
0.83Goals scored / match0.97
Posta RangersPolice
1.24Goals conceded / match0.62
Posta RangersPolice
47%Average possession51%
Posta RangersPolice
2.97Shots on target / match3.97
Posta RangersPolice

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.72Shots per match12.38
Posta RangersPolice
2.97Shots on target3.97
Posta RangersPolice
9.5%Shot conversion7.8%
Posta RangersPolice
47%Possession51%
Posta RangersPolice
1.23xG for1.62
Posta RangersPolice
1.6xG against1.36
Posta RangersPolice

Shooting quality

Posta Rangers: BalancedPolice: Balanced
Posta RangersPolice
Accuracy (shots on target)34%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Police is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Posta Rangers · 2.6 pts / match - Police

Posta Rangers
WLLLD
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-11
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Police
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W38% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-5
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Police is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Posta Rangers · 0.97 goals / match - Police

Police is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Posta Rangers · 0.62 goals / match - Police

Posta Rangers scoring profile: mixed

Posta Rangers scores in 55% of matches (16 of 29 matches), while Police keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).

Police scoring profile: strong

Police scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while Posta Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

24Goals scored (season)28
Posta RangersPolice
36Goals conceded (season)18
Posta RangersPolice
2.07Average goals in match1.59
Posta RangersPolice
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Posta RangersPolice
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
Posta RangersPolice

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal62%
Posta RangersPolice
28%2 goals28%
Posta RangersPolice
0%3 goals7%
Posta RangersPolice
0%4 goals0%
Posta RangersPolice

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal48%
Posta RangersPolice
34%2 goals14%
Posta RangersPolice
10%3 goals0%
Posta RangersPolice
0%4 goals0%
Posta RangersPolice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time0%
Posta RangersPolice
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Posta RangersPolice
7%Scored in both halves0%
Posta RangersPolice

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Posta RangersPolice
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Posta RangersPolice
40%BTTS - last 540%
Posta RangersPolice

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

24%Min. 1 goal before half-time7%
Posta RangersPolice
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
Posta RangersPolice
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Posta RangersPolice

2nd half

24%Min. 1 goal after half-time3%
Posta RangersPolice
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Posta RangersPolice
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Posta RangersPolice

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Posta Rangers is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Posta Rangers · 1.03 pts / match - Police

Posta Rangers - half-time state
14% leading79% draw7% trailing
Police - half-time state
3% leading93% draw3% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.03
Posta RangersPolice
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.07
Posta RangersPolice
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.07
Posta RangersPolice
0.38Average goals (1st half)0.14
Posta RangersPolice
86%Clean sheet before half-time97%
Posta RangersPolice
83%No goal before half-time97%
Posta RangersPolice

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)0.97
Posta RangersPolice
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0
Posta RangersPolice
0.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.03
Posta RangersPolice
0.45Average goals (2nd half)0.03
Posta RangersPolice
79%Clean sheet after half-time97%
Posta RangersPolice
90%No goal after half-time100%
Posta RangersPolice

Posta Rangers - second-half results

3% W83% R14% P
35
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Police - second-half results

0% W97% R3% P
30
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding1500%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Posta Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Police - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Posta Rangers
ScoredConceded
14
23
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Police
ScoredConceded
27
16
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (27 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Posta Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Police

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 96% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Posta RangersLigaPolice
Average goals in match 2.072.01 1.59
Both teams scored 45%43% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%33% 21%
Clean sheets 21%36% 52%
Goal before half-time 24%21% 7%
Goal after half-time 24%22% 3%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Posta Rangers 0 - 1 - 0 Police. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Police
0 : 0
Posta Rangers

FAQ

What was the result of Posta Rangers vs Police?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Posta Rangers 2:0 Police. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Posta Rangers vs Police?

Posta Rangers score 0.83 goals per game on average and Police 0.97. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Posta Rangers's matches and 31% of Police's.

What form are Posta Rangers and Police in?

Over the last 5 games Posta Rangers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Police 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Posta Rangers vs Police?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.