Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Posta Rangers vs Shabana: match statistics

Posta Rangers crest
Posta Rangers
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Shabana crest
Shabana
130%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
240%(0.00)

Shabana displays significantly better form in their last five matches with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG: 2.2) compared to Posta Rangers (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 defeat, PPG: 1.6). The away team boasts an impressive away record with 50% wins and 50% draws and no defeats, highlighting their solidity away from home. Shabana is characterized by better away defense, conceding on average only 0.63 goals per match, while the hosts concede an average of 1 goal at home. Furthermore, Shabana has a superior seasonal goal difference (17:12) compared to Posta Rangers (14:18) and a higher shooting efficiency in away matches. The visitors' recent away form (wddwdwdw) and the fact they haven't lost any of their last five matches give them a psychological and statistical edge in this encounter.

Posta Rangers vs Shabana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Posta Rangers play Shabana in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 7 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Posta Rangers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Shabana: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Posta Rangers scores 0.83 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Shabana scores 1.14 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Posta Rangers 45%, Shabana 43%. Over 2.5: Posta Rangers 34%, Shabana 39%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Shabana has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.23. Posta Rangers: 8.7 shots per match, Shabana: 10.5.

Match halves

Posta Rangers: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.14. Shabana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

Posta Rangers: 0-15 (14 goals). Shabana: 0-15 (25 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Shabana displays significantly better form in their last five matches with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG: 2.2) compared to Posta Rangers (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 defeat, PPG: 1.6). The away team boasts an impressive away record with 50% wins and 50% draws and no defeats, highlighting their solidity away from home. Shabana is characterized by better away defense, conceding on average only 0.63 goals per match, while the hosts concede an average of 1 goal at home. Furthermore, Shabana has a superior seasonal goal difference (17:12) compared to Posta Rangers (14:18) and a higher shooting efficiency in away matches. The visitors' recent away form (wddwdwdw) and the fact they haven't lost any of their last five matches give them a psychological and statistical edge in this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Posta RangersShabana
13Shots10
Posta RangersShabana
3Shots on target4
Posta RangersShabana
1.71xG1.43
Posta RangersShabana
6Corners6
Posta RangersShabana
94Dangerous attacks72
Posta RangersShabana
-1Fouls-1
Posta RangersShabana
-1Cards-1
Posta RangersShabana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Posta RangersShabana
0.83Goals scored / match1.14
Posta RangersShabana
1.24Goals conceded / match1.07
Posta RangersShabana
47%Average possession48%
Posta RangersShabana
2.97Shots on target / match3.32
Posta RangersShabana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.72Shots per match10.54
Posta RangersShabana
2.97Shots on target3.32
Posta RangersShabana
9.5%Shot conversion10.8%
Posta RangersShabana
47%Possession48%
Posta RangersShabana
1.23xG for1.43
Posta RangersShabana
1.6xG against1.43
Posta RangersShabana

Shooting quality

Posta Rangers: BalancedShabana: Balanced
Posta RangersShabana
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shabana is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Posta Rangers · 1.2 pts / match - Shabana

Posta Rangers
WLLLD
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-11
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Shabana
LLWLW
Season result split
46% W25% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-8
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shabana is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Posta Rangers · 1.14 goals / match - Shabana

Shabana is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Posta Rangers · 1.07 goals / match - Shabana

Posta Rangers scoring profile: mixed

Posta Rangers scores in 55% of matches (16 of 29 matches), while Shabana keeps a clean sheet in 50% (14 of 28 matches).

Shabana scoring profile: very strong

Shabana scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Posta Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

24Goals scored (season)32
Posta RangersShabana
36Goals conceded (season)30
Posta RangersShabana
2.07Average goals in match2.21
Posta RangersShabana
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Posta RangersShabana
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Posta RangersShabana

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal82%
Posta RangersShabana
28%2 goals18%
Posta RangersShabana
0%3 goals11%
Posta RangersShabana
0%4 goals4%
Posta RangersShabana

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal50%
Posta RangersShabana
34%2 goals36%
Posta RangersShabana
10%3 goals14%
Posta RangersShabana
0%4 goals4%
Posta RangersShabana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time7%
Posta RangersShabana
3%BTTS in both halves4%
Posta RangersShabana
7%Scored in both halves4%
Posta RangersShabana

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Posta RangersShabana
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Posta RangersShabana
40%BTTS - last 540%
Posta RangersShabana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

24%Min. 1 goal before half-time29%
Posta RangersShabana
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
Posta RangersShabana
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Posta RangersShabana

2nd half

24%Min. 1 goal after half-time25%
Posta RangersShabana
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time11%
Posta RangersShabana
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Posta RangersShabana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shabana is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Posta Rangers · 1.29 pts / match - Shabana

Posta Rangers - half-time state
14% leading79% draw7% trailing
Shabana - half-time state
18% leading75% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.29
Posta RangersShabana
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.29
Posta RangersShabana
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
Posta RangersShabana
0.38Average goals (1st half)0.46
Posta RangersShabana
86%Clean sheet before half-time86%
Posta RangersShabana
83%No goal before half-time79%
Posta RangersShabana

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.04
Posta RangersShabana
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
Posta RangersShabana
0.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.21
Posta RangersShabana
0.45Average goals (2nd half)0.36
Posta RangersShabana
79%Clean sheet after half-time82%
Posta RangersShabana
90%No goal after half-time86%
Posta RangersShabana

Posta Rangers - second-half results

3% W83% R14% P
35
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shabana - second-half results

7% W82% R11% P
36
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding256%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Posta Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Shabana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal20%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Posta Rangers
ScoredConceded
14
23
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Shabana
ScoredConceded
25
19
0-15
3
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (25 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Posta Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Shabana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 78% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Posta RangersLigaShabana
Average goals in match 2.072.01 2.21
Both teams scored 45%43% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%33% 39%
Clean sheets 21%36% 50%
Goal before half-time 24%21% 29%
Goal after half-time 24%22% 25%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Posta Rangers 1 - 0 - 0 Shabana. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Shabana
1 : 2
Posta Rangers

FAQ

What was the result of Posta Rangers vs Shabana?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Posta Rangers 0:2 Shabana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Posta Rangers vs Shabana?

Posta Rangers score 0.83 goals per game on average and Shabana 1.14. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Posta Rangers's matches and 43% of Shabana's.

What form are Posta Rangers and Shabana in?

Over the last 5 games Posta Rangers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Shabana 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Posta Rangers vs Shabana?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Posta Rangers vs Shabana: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.