Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Hammam-Lif: match statistics
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Hammam-Lif: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer played Hammam-Lif in Ligue 1 (Tunisia). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Hammam-Lif: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer scores 1.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Hammam-Lif scores 0.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer 0%, Hammam-Lif 0%. Over 2.5: Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer 0%, Hammam-Lif 0%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 40%.
xG, shots and style
Hammam-Lif has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.02. Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer: 8.0 shots per match, Hammam-Lif: 14.0.
Match halves
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.00. Hammam-Lif: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer: 0-15 (2 goals). Hammam-Lif: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 1: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 40%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer sit 2nd, while Hammam-Lif are 12th, strengthening the case for the home side. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws with a 10:2 goal difference. At home, Progrès won their only match so far 2:0, creating chances worth an average of 1.00 xG and allowing opponents just 0.53 xG. Hammam-Lif do have 2 wins in their last five matches, but they scored only 3 goals during that period—significantly fewer than the hosts’ 10. Progrès’ solid defence, which has yet to concede at home, should give the hosts the edge, although a run of three draws in five matches increases the likelihood of the points being shared.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal is Hammam-Lif’s very low attacking efficiency in their last five matches: the team averaged just 0.6 goals, while their xG was only 0.52. BTTS - Yes occurred in just 20% of the visitors’ last five games, whereas Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer recorded this scenario in 40% of their matches. The hosts are in good offensive form, averaging 2.0 goals and 1.69 xG across their last five appearances, while conceding only 0.4 goals per game. The visitors’ low xG, combined with the hosts’ defensive strength, suggests a high risk that Hammam-Lif will fail to score. In addition, the league’s BTTS rate stands at just 36%, with an average of 1.73 goals per match, clearly supporting BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team is expected to remain scoreless.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The Tunisian league is a very low-scoring competition, averaging just 1.73 goals per match, with only 27% of games going over 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Progrès averaged 2.0 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, while Hammam-Lif scored just 0.6 goals and also conceded 0.4. The visitors create few chances, with an average xG of 0.52 across their last five appearances, while the hosts allow opponents 0.86 xG. Both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five matches, which, despite the hosts’ strong attacking form, points to a limited goal ceiling. The strongest option is Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of 1.85 goals leaves a clear margin even for a 2:1 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The data from the last five matches clearly suggest a cautious start: Progrès were level at half-time in 60% of their matches, while Hammam-Lif recorded a half-time draw in 67%. The visitors scored just 0.33 goals per match before the break and kept a clean sheet in the first half in 100% of these games, limiting the hosts’ chances of taking an early lead. After the interval, Hammam-Lif averaged no goals per match, whereas Progrès scored 0.8 goals and conceded none. The hosts are also unbeaten in their last five matches, with a record of two wins and three draws, while their opponents lost 20% of their games. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a narrow Progrès victory, thanks to their superior second-half efficiency.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer | Hammam-Lif | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Hammam-Lif keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
Hammam-Lif scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer
Over / Under - Hammam-Lif
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hammam-Lif - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer
Hammam-Lif
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer | Liga | Hammam-Lif | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.00 | 2.00 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 47% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 100% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 67% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
FAQ
What was the result of Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Hammam-Lif?
The Ligue 1 match finished Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer 1:0 Hammam-Lif. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Hammam-Lif?
Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer score 1.00 goals per game on average and Hammam-Lif 0.00. The Ligue 1 average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer's matches and 0% of Hammam-Lif's.
What form are Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer and Hammam-Lif in?
Over the last 5 games Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Hammam-Lif 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Hammam-Lif?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


