Uruguay - Primera DivisiónData current as of 06 September 2026

Progreso vs Wanderers: match statistics

Progreso crest
Progreso
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Wanderers crest
Wanderers

Progreso vs Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Progreso played Wanderers in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Progreso: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Wanderers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Progreso scores 0.82 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Wanderers scores 1.09 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Progreso 36%, Wanderers 55%. Over 2.5: Progreso 36%, Wanderers 64%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Wanderers has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.10. Progreso: 7.9 shots per match, Wanderers: 11.0.

Match halves

Progreso: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.45. Wanderers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Progreso: 76-90+ (3 goals). Wanderers: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Wanderers win because Progreso have no home wins (0% win rate), score only 0.83 goals per game on average and failed to score in 67% of their home matches. The hosts concede 2.0 goals per home game and have a -7 goal difference at their stadium, while Wanderers concede 1.8 away and have a -4 goal difference, indicating a weaker defense at Progreso. Offensively the visitors create more: Wanderers average 12 shots and 3.4 on target per away match versus Progreso’s 8 shots and 2.83 on target, and xG 1.41 vs 1.13 suggests higher quality chances for the visitors. Form confirms Wanderers’ edge — they average 1.2 points per game in the last 5 matches, while Progreso average just 0.4 and have not won any of their last five. Given the higher away xG, greater shot volume and a much lower percentage of scoreless games for Wanderers (20% vs 67%), I predict a Wanderers victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes. Season metrics show Progreso has BTTS 50% and Wanderers 60% versus a league average of 49%. In the last 5 matches Wanderers have BTTS 80% and Progreso 40%; Progreso averages 0.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded in that span, while Wanderers score 1.6 and concede 1.8. Both teams’ xG are similar: Progreso xG 1.4, Wanderers xG 1.41; xG against 1.56 and 1.58 respectively, indicating risk of goals from both sides. Additionally, Progreso averages 4.5 shots on target per match versus Wanderers 3.4, with conversion rates 11% vs 8% and clean sheet percentages 33% vs 20%, which together support a scenario where both teams find the net. Considering also that home matches over 2.5 goals occur in 67% and away matches in 60%, I assess BTTS probability at around 70% versus 30% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I recommend Over 1.5: both teams register a high share of matches above 1.5 goals this season — Progreso 83% and Wanderers 80% (avg 81.5%). xG values confirm goal potential: attacking xG 1.4 (Progreso) and 1.41 (Wanderers), and conceded xG 1.56 (Progreso) and 1.58 (Wanderers), yielding about 1.49 expected goals for Progreso and 1.48 for Wanderers, totaling 2.97 goals. Additionally, Wanderers have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches (avg 1.6) with 100% of those games over 2.5, while Progreso have 4 goals in their last 5 (avg 0.8) and only 20% over 2.5 — this shows asymmetry but still boosts total goals. Seasonal over 2.5 rates are 67% (Progreso) and 60% (Wanderers), roughly 64% on average — a moderate signal, but the strongest and most consistent signal from the data is the Over 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select the X/2 scenario (draw at Half-Time, Wanderers win Full-Time) as the most probable: in the last 5 matches Wanderers have a 40% win rate versus 0% for the hosts, and their average Half-Time points in the last 5 matches is 1.4 for Wanderers versus 0.4 for Progreso. The first half should remain balanced — Progreso were level at the break in 50% of matches, and both teams have a high proportion of games with at least one goal before Half-Time (Progreso 83% vs Wanderers 80%). In the second half the visitors have the edge: Wanderers’ average second-half goals are 1.6 versus 1.17 for the hosts, and in the last 5 matches Wanderers have scored >0.5 goals after the break in 100% of cases. The teams’ xG is almost identical (1.4 vs 1.41), indicating even chances, but Wanderers’ better form and effectiveness in second halves and their 40% win rate in the last 5 matches shift the Full-Time result in favor of the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
ProgresoWanderers
9Shots16
ProgresoWanderers
3Shots on target4
ProgresoWanderers
1.2xG2.02
ProgresoWanderers
3Corners5
ProgresoWanderers
58Dangerous attacks101
ProgresoWanderers
20Fouls12
ProgresoWanderers
2Cards2
ProgresoWanderers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.82Goals scored / match1.09
ProgresoWanderers
1.64Goals conceded / match1.55
ProgresoWanderers
47%Average possession48%
ProgresoWanderers
3Shots on target / match4
ProgresoWanderers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.91Shots per match11
ProgresoWanderers
3Shots on target4
ProgresoWanderers
10.3%Shot conversion9.9%
ProgresoWanderers
47%Possession48%
ProgresoWanderers
1.1xG for1.4
ProgresoWanderers
1.52xG against1.57
ProgresoWanderers

Shooting quality

Progreso: BalancedWanderers: Balanced
ProgresoWanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wanderers is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Progreso · 1.2 pts / match - Wanderers

Progreso
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
9% W36% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-6
0.64 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Wanderers
WLWLL
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-5
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wanderers is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - Progreso · 1.09 goals / match - Wanderers

Wanderers is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - Progreso · 1.55 goals / match - Wanderers

Progreso scoring profile: mixed

Progreso scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Wanderers scoring profile: very strong

Wanderers scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Progreso keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

9Goals scored (season)12
ProgresoWanderers
18Goals conceded (season)17
ProgresoWanderers
2.45Average goals in match2.64
ProgresoWanderers
4Goals scored (last 5)8
ProgresoWanderers
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
ProgresoWanderers

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal73%
ProgresoWanderers
27%2 goals27%
ProgresoWanderers
9%3 goals9%
ProgresoWanderers
0%4 goals0%
ProgresoWanderers

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal73%
ProgresoWanderers
55%2 goals45%
ProgresoWanderers
18%3 goals18%
ProgresoWanderers
0%4 goals18%
ProgresoWanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
ProgresoWanderers
18%BTTS in both halves0%
ProgresoWanderers
27%Scored in both halves18%
ProgresoWanderers

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
ProgresoWanderers
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
ProgresoWanderers
40%BTTS - last 580%
ProgresoWanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
ProgresoWanderers
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
ProgresoWanderers
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ProgresoWanderers

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
ProgresoWanderers
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
ProgresoWanderers
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
ProgresoWanderers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wanderers is 84% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.64 pts / match - Progreso · 1.18 pts / match - Wanderers

Progreso - half-time state
9% leading36% draw55% trailing
Wanderers - half-time state
27% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.64Points per match (1st half)1.18
ProgresoWanderers
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.55
ProgresoWanderers
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
ProgresoWanderers
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.27
ProgresoWanderers
27%Clean sheet before half-time45%
ProgresoWanderers
73%No goal before half-time55%
ProgresoWanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.27
ProgresoWanderers
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
ProgresoWanderers
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
ProgresoWanderers
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.36
ProgresoWanderers
45%Clean sheet after half-time55%
ProgresoWanderers
55%No goal after half-time55%
ProgresoWanderers

Progreso - second-half results

18% W45% R36% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wanderers - second-half results

36% W18% R45% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Progreso - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Wanderers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Progreso
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Wanderers
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Progreso

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

ProgresoLigaWanderers
Average goals in match 2.452.47 2.64
Both teams scored 36%49% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%46% 64%
Clean sheets 9%28% 27%
Goal before half-time 82%72% 82%
Goal after half-time 73%75% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WanderersYellow cardRodrigo Rivero Fernández
  2. ProgresoYellow cardFacundo de León Abate
  3. ProgresoYellow cardHernán Carroso Pais
  4. WanderersYellow cardLucas Nahuel Furtado Cabrera
  5. WanderersGoalJonás Luna
  6. ProgresoSubstitutionOn: Agustin PazOff: Elvis Nahuel López Barboza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Gustavo TejeraMatches officiated: 14
4.93Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins7%Draws43%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Progreso 1 - 1 - 0 Wanderers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Club Atlético Progreso
2 : 0
Montevideo Wanderers Fútbol Club
Montevideo Wanderers Fútbol Club
1 : 1
Club Atlético Progreso

FAQ

What was the result of Progreso vs Wanderers?

The Primera División match finished Progreso 2:1 Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Progreso and Wanderers?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Progreso won 1, Wanderers won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Progreso vs Wanderers?

Progreso score 0.82 goals per game on average and Wanderers 1.09. The Primera División average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Progreso's matches and 55% of Wanderers's.

What form are Progreso and Wanderers in?

Over the last 5 games Progreso have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Wanderers 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Progreso vs Wanderers?

The statistical background for Progreso vs Wanderers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.