Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 30 October 2026

Proxy vs Ismaily SC: match statistics

Proxy crest
Proxy
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Ismaily SC crest
Ismaily SC

Proxy vs Ismaily SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Proxy played Ismaily SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 30 October 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Proxy: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ismaily SC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Proxy scores 0.80 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Ismaily SC scores 1.10 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Proxy 30%, Ismaily SC 70%. Over 2.5: Proxy 40%, Ismaily SC 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Ismaily SC has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.23. Proxy: 8.1 shots per match, Ismaily SC: 6.5.

Match halves

Proxy: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.40. Ismaily SC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Proxy: 0-15 (2 goals). Ismaily SC: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ismaily SC have been in better form recently, taking 8 points from their last five matches compared with Proxy’s 5, while scoring 7 goals to the hosts’ 6. Away from home, the visitors average 1.4 goals per match and generate an xG of 1.8, whereas Proxy score 1 goal per home game with an xG of 1.35. The difference in finishing is also reflected in the fact that the hosts have failed to score in 60% of their home matches, compared with just 20% of the visitors’ away games. However, both teams concede an average of 1.4 goals in these conditions, so Ismaily have no clear defensive edge. With 60% of their away matches ending in draws and just one win in their last five on the road, a share of the points looks the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 60% of Proxy’s matches and 80% of Ismaily SC’s, while the rate was 60% for both teams across their last five matches. Proxy have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.6 goals per match, which favors the visitors finding the net; they score an average of 1.4 goals. The hosts’ scoring chances are supported by Ismaily SC conceding an average of 1.4 goals and the fact that the visitors have kept a clean sheet in only 20% of their matches. However, caution is warranted: Proxy score just 0.8 goals on average and have failed to score in 40% of their matches. Despite this risk, the frequent goals from both sides and their poor defensive records favor BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 80% of matches involving the two teams, giving Over 1.5 stronger statistical support than higher lines. Proxy concede an average of 1.6 goals per match, while Ismaily SC score 1.4 and create chances worth 1.8 xG, increasing the likelihood of goals from the visitors. The hosts score an average of 0.8 goals, but their opponents concede 1.4, so a Proxy goal is also a realistic possibility. In the teams’ last five matches, the 2.5-goal line was surpassed in 60% of cases; however, the league average is just 2.33 goals, which calls for caution with this line. With a projected total of 2.65 goals, Over 1.5 remains the best pick, estimated at 78%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Ismaily went into the break level in 60% of their matches so far, and in each of the last four matches considered. Proxy score an average of just 0.25 goals before half-time, limiting the hosts’ chances of taking an early lead. After the break, the advantage shifts to the visitors: they score an average of 0.8 goals, while Proxy concede 1.25 and lost all four second halves considered. Ismaily also have the better record across their last five matches, averaging 1.6 points per game compared with Proxy’s 1.0. The visitors’ high 60% rate of full-time draws means a draw at the final whistle remains a notable alternative, but the stronger signal points to an Ismaily win after a closely contested first half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
ProxyIsmaily SC
-1Shots-1
ProxyIsmaily SC
-1Shots on target-1
ProxyIsmaily SC
0xG0
ProxyIsmaily SC
7Corners6
ProxyIsmaily SC
0Dangerous attacks0
ProxyIsmaily SC
-1Fouls-1
ProxyIsmaily SC
-1Cards-1
ProxyIsmaily SC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.8Goals scored / match1.1
ProxyIsmaily SC
1.5Goals conceded / match1.5
ProxyIsmaily SC
50%Average possession40%
ProxyIsmaily SC
1.8Shots on target / match2.3
ProxyIsmaily SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.1Shots per match6.5
ProxyIsmaily SC
1.8Shots on target2.3
ProxyIsmaily SC
9.9%Shot conversion16.9%
ProxyIsmaily SC
50%Possession40%
ProxyIsmaily SC
1.23xG for1.8
ProxyIsmaily SC
1.35xG against1.03
ProxyIsmaily SC

Shooting quality

Proxy: BalancedIsmaily SC: Counter-attacking
ProxyIsmaily SC
Accuracy (shots on target)22%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.28
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ismaily SC is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Proxy · 1.6 pts / match - Ismaily SC

Proxy
LLDWD
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-6
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ismaily SC
WDWDL
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ismaily SC is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Proxy · 1.1 goals / match - Ismaily SC

Proxy scoring profile: strong

Proxy scores in 40% of matches (4 of 10 matches), while Ismaily SC keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

Ismaily SC scoring profile: very strong

Ismaily SC scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

8Goals scored (season)11
ProxyIsmaily SC
15Goals conceded (season)15
ProxyIsmaily SC
2.3Average goals in match2.6
ProxyIsmaily SC
6Goals scored (last 5)7
ProxyIsmaily SC
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
ProxyIsmaily SC

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal70%
ProxyIsmaily SC
30%2 goals30%
ProxyIsmaily SC
10%3 goals10%
ProxyIsmaily SC
0%4 goals0%
ProxyIsmaily SC

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal90%
ProxyIsmaily SC
40%2 goals50%
ProxyIsmaily SC
20%3 goals10%
ProxyIsmaily SC
0%4 goals0%
ProxyIsmaily SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time20%
ProxyIsmaily SC
0%BTTS in both halves20%
ProxyIsmaily SC
10%Scored in both halves20%
ProxyIsmaily SC

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ProxyIsmaily SC
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ProxyIsmaily SC
60%BTTS - last 560%
ProxyIsmaily SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
ProxyIsmaily SC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
ProxyIsmaily SC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ProxyIsmaily SC

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ProxyIsmaily SC
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
ProxyIsmaily SC
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ProxyIsmaily SC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ismaily SC is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Proxy · 1.1 pts / match - Ismaily SC

Proxy - half-time state
10% leading50% draw40% trailing
Ismaily SC - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.1
ProxyIsmaily SC
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
ProxyIsmaily SC
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
ProxyIsmaily SC
0.8Average goals (1st half)1
ProxyIsmaily SC
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ProxyIsmaily SC
80%No goal before half-time60%
ProxyIsmaily SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.9
ProxyIsmaily SC
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ProxyIsmaily SC
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
ProxyIsmaily SC
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.3
ProxyIsmaily SC
50%Clean sheet after half-time30%
ProxyIsmaily SC
80%No goal after half-time60%
ProxyIsmaily SC

Proxy - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ismaily SC - second-half results

20% W30% D50% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Proxy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ismaily SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ismaily SC
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
0
5
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Ismaily SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ProxyLigaIsmaily SC
Average goals in match• 2.302.33▲ 2.60
Both teams scored▼ 30%50%▲ 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%43%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 10%32%▼ 10%
Goal before half-time• 60%59%▲ 70%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%73%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.33
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ismaily SCGoalHassan Saber

FAQ

What was the result of Proxy vs Ismaily SC?

The Second Division match finished Proxy 0:2 Ismaily SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Proxy vs Ismaily SC?

Proxy score 0.80 goals per game on average and Ismaily SC 1.10. The Second Division average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Proxy's matches and 70% of Ismaily SC's.

What form are Proxy and Ismaily SC in?

Over the last 5 games Proxy have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ismaily SC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Proxy vs Ismaily SC?

The statistical background for Proxy vs Ismaily SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.