Proxy vs Masar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Proxy played Masar in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 11 December 2025. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Proxy: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Masar: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Proxy scores 1.07 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Masar scores 1.14 and concedes 0.64. League average: 1.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Proxy 64%, Masar 29%. Over 2.5: Proxy 36%, Masar 21%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Proxy has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.27. Proxy: 7.4 shots per match, Masar: 7.9.

Match halves

Proxy: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.71. Masar: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Proxy: 76-90+ (6 goals). Masar: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.83 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
ProxyMasar
-1Shots-1
ProxyMasar
-1Shots on target-1
ProxyMasar
0xG0
ProxyMasar
-1Corners-1
ProxyMasar
0Dangerous attacks0
ProxyMasar
-1Fouls-1
ProxyMasar
-1Cards-1
ProxyMasar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match1.14
ProxyMasar
0.86Goals conceded / match0.64
ProxyMasar
40%Average possession43%
ProxyMasar
2.86Shots on target / match3.21
ProxyMasar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.43Shots per match7.86
ProxyMasar
2.86Shots on target3.21
ProxyMasar
14.4%Shot conversion14.5%
ProxyMasar
40%Possession43%
ProxyMasar
1.4xG for1.27
ProxyMasar
1.31xG against1.17
ProxyMasar

Shooting quality

Proxy: Counter-attackingMasar: Counter-attacking
ProxyMasar
Accuracy (shots on target)38%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Proxy · 2.2 pts / match - Masar

Proxy
DWLWD
Season result split
36% W50% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Masar
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W36% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-3
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Proxy · 1.14 goals / match - Masar

Masar is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Proxy · 0.64 goals / match - Masar

Proxy scoring profile: mixed

Proxy scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 57% (8 of 14 matches).

Masar scoring profile: strong

Masar scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

15Goals scored (season)16
ProxyMasar
12Goals conceded (season)9
ProxyMasar
1.93Average goals in match1.79
ProxyMasar
5Goals scored (last 5)6
ProxyMasar
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
ProxyMasar

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal64%
ProxyMasar
21%2 goals29%
ProxyMasar
7%3 goals14%
ProxyMasar
0%4 goals7%
ProxyMasar

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal43%
ProxyMasar
21%2 goals14%
ProxyMasar
0%3 goals7%
ProxyMasar
0%4 goals0%
ProxyMasar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time14%
ProxyMasar
0%BTTS in both halves7%
ProxyMasar
7%Scored in both halves21%
ProxyMasar

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
ProxyMasar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
ProxyMasar
60%BTTS - last 520%
ProxyMasar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ProxyMasar
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
ProxyMasar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
ProxyMasar

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
ProxyMasar
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
ProxyMasar
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ProxyMasar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - Proxy · 1.57 pts / match - Masar

Proxy - half-time state
0% leading86% draw14% trailing
Masar - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)1.57
ProxyMasar
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.5
ProxyMasar
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
ProxyMasar
0.86Average goals (1st half)0.79
ProxyMasar
50%Clean sheet before half-time79%
ProxyMasar
64%No goal before half-time57%
ProxyMasar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.86Points per match (2nd half)1.29
ProxyMasar
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
ProxyMasar
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
ProxyMasar
1.07Average goals (2nd half)0.93
ProxyMasar
71%Clean sheet after half-time64%
ProxyMasar
50%No goal after half-time64%
ProxyMasar

Proxy - second-half results

50% W36% D14% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Masar - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Proxy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Masar
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ProxyLigaMasar
Average goals in match 1.931.83 1.79
Both teams scored 64%38% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%28% 21%
Clean sheets 36%40% 57%
Goal before half-time 50%49% 50%
Goal after half-time 64%67% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.83
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
49%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Proxy vs Masar?

The Second Division match finished Proxy 1:4 Masar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Proxy vs Masar?

Proxy score 1.07 goals per game on average and Masar 1.14. The Second Division average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Proxy's matches and 29% of Masar's.

What form are Proxy and Masar in?

Over the last 5 games Proxy have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Masar 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Proxy vs Masar?

The statistical background for Proxy vs Masar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.