Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 15 October 2026

Proxy vs Telecom Egypt SC: match statistics

Proxy crest
Proxy
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Telecom Egypt SC crest
Telecom Egypt SC

Proxy vs Telecom Egypt SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Proxy played Telecom Egypt SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 2 October 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Proxy: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Telecom Egypt SC: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Proxy scores 0.33 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Telecom Egypt SC scores 1.33 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Proxy 0%, Telecom Egypt SC 33%. Over 2.5: Proxy 17%, Telecom Egypt SC 33%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Telecom Egypt SC has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.23. Proxy: 9.5 shots per match, Telecom Egypt SC: 11.2.

Match halves

Proxy: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.17. Telecom Egypt SC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Proxy: 31-45+ (1 goals). Telecom Egypt SC: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Telecom Egypt SC sit 6th and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while 18th-placed Proxy have lost 4 of their last 5. Over this period, the visitors have scored 8 goals and conceded 3, whereas the hosts have managed just 2 goals and conceded 6, clearly tilting the balance in favour of the away side. However, the gap is not as wide as their overall form suggests: Telecom Egypt SC have won only 1 of 3 away matches and average 0.67 goals per game, exactly the same as Proxy’s home scoring average. Both teams have failed to score in 67% of their matches at home and away, respectively, despite posting similar average xG figures of 1.35 and 1.36. A narrow away win therefore looks the most likely outcome, although both sides’ lack of cutting edge increases the chances of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score: in Telecom Egypt’s away matches, both teams scored in 0% of cases, and the visitors failed to find the net in 67% of those games. Proxy average 2.0 goals at home and have not recorded a scoreless match, but across their last 5 appearances their average has fallen to 0.4 goals, with an xG of 0.88. Telecom Egypt have conceded an average of only 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches, so Proxy’s recent scoring form is a concern despite their strong home numbers. On the other hand, the visitors have averaged 1.6 goals recently, while Proxy have conceded 1.2, leaving a genuine possibility that both teams will score. However, weighing these signals alongside the league average of 2.02 goals per match, BTTS - No is the preferred pick. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: none of the analyzed Telecom Egypt SC matches went over this line, while this happened in 33% of Proxy’s matches. In their last five games, Proxy averaged just 0.4 goals scored, while Telecom Egypt SC conceded an average of 0.6, limiting the forecast for the home side despite their average of 2.0 goals in home matches. The visitors have recently averaged 1.6 goals scored, but their average in the analyzed away matches is 0.67; moreover, 100% of their away matches finished Under 2.5 goals. The total-goals forecast of 2.0 is also close to the league average of 2.02, making the 3.5 line a safer margin than 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Proxy have won all 3 included home matches and led at the break in 2 of them, while Telecom Egypt SC were trailing at half-time in 2 of their 3 away matches. The hosts averaged 1.33 first-half goals at home, while the visitors failed to score before the break in any of their away matches, supporting the case for Proxy to lead at the break. After half-time, both teams averaged 0.67 goals in these conditions, so Proxy are more likely to hold their advantage than suffer a turnaround. However, the signal is not conclusive: across their last 5 matches overall, Proxy won only once, while Telecom Egypt SC won 4 times, and the visitors also had the higher xG, at 1.36 compared with 1.03 for the hosts. Despite the visitors' improved form, the home-and-away records point most strongly to Proxy leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
11Shots11
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
1Shots on target5
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0xG0
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
3Corners2
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0Dangerous attacks0
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0Fouls0
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0Cards0
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.33Goals scored / match1.33
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
1.17Goals conceded / match0.83
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
51%Average possession52%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
2.33Shots on target / match3.5
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match11.17
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
2.33Shots on target3.5
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
3.5%Shot conversion11.9%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
51%Possession52%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
1.23xG for1.25
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
1.35xG against1.13
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

Shooting quality

Proxy: BalancedTelecom Egypt SC: Balanced
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
Accuracy (shots on target)25%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.140.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Telecom Egypt SC is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Proxy · 2.4 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Proxy
LWLLL
Season result split
17% W0% D83% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-5
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Telecom Egypt SC
WWWLW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Telecom Egypt SC is 303% better for: goals scored per match.

0.33 goals / match - Proxy · 1.33 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Telecom Egypt SC is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Proxy · 0.83 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Proxy scoring profile: more difficult

Proxy scores in 17% of matches (1 of 6 matches), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

Telecom Egypt SC scoring profile: very strong

Telecom Egypt SC scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

2Goals scored (season)8
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
7Goals conceded (season)5
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
1.5Average goals in match2.17
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
2Goals scored (last 5)8
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

How often they score at least...

17%1 goal67%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
17%2 goals50%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%3 goals17%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%4 goals0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal67%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
17%2 goals17%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
17%3 goals0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%4 goals0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
17%Scored in both halves17%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%BTTS - last 540%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Telecom Egypt SC is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Proxy · 1.33 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Proxy - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Telecom Egypt SC - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.33
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.67
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.17
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
83%No goal before half-time50%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)1.33
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
50%Clean sheet after half-time67%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC
83%No goal after half-time67%
ProxyTelecom Egypt SC

Proxy - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Proxy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Telecom Egypt SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Telecom Egypt SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-73%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
11%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.90
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
27%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Telecom Egypt SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ProxyLigaTelecom Egypt SC
Average goals in match▼ 1.502.14• 2.17
Both teams scored▼ 0%45%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%36%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 17%34%• 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%58%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%75%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Proxy 1 - 1 - 0 Telecom Egypt SC. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Telecom Egypt SC
0 : 1
Proxy
Proxy
0 : 0
Telecom Egypt SC

FAQ

What was the result of Proxy vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The Second Division match finished Proxy 0:3 Telecom Egypt SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Proxy and Telecom Egypt SC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Proxy won 1, Telecom Egypt SC won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Proxy vs Telecom Egypt SC?

Proxy score 0.33 goals per game on average and Telecom Egypt SC 1.33. The Second Division average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Proxy's matches and 33% of Telecom Egypt SC's.

What form are Proxy and Telecom Egypt SC in?

Over the last 5 games Proxy have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Telecom Egypt SC 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Proxy vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The statistical background for Proxy vs Telecom Egypt SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.