Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 07 September 2026

PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: match statistics

PSBS Biak Numfor crest
PSBS Biak Numfor
2 : 5half-time 2:4
Arema crest
Arema

PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSBS Biak Numfor played Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 2:5.

Current form

PSBS Biak Numfor: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Arema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSBS Biak Numfor scores 0.91 and concedes 2.59 goals per match. Arema scores 1.41 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSBS Biak Numfor 56%, Arema 63%. Over 2.5: PSBS Biak Numfor 72%, Arema 59%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Arema has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.23. PSBS Biak Numfor: 10.5 shots per match, Arema: 11.7.

Match halves

PSBS Biak Numfor: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.50. Arema: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.97.

Goals by minute

PSBS Biak Numfor: 31-45+ (9 goals). Arema: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Arema is the favorite in this match and I forecast an away win. Arema sits 10th with 11 wins and 45 goals this season, while PSBS Biak Numfor are 18th with only 4 wins and 29 goals. In their last 5 matches PSBS have not scored, lost all 5 and conceded 19 goals (3.8 per game), whereas Arema have scored 7 in their last 5 and are averaging 1.4 points per game over that stretch. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge: PSBS concede 2.25 goals per home game versus Arema conceding 1.25 on the road; additionally PSBS fail to score in 56% of home matches while Arema are goalless in only 25% of away fixtures. Despite similar xG (PSBS at home 1.38 vs Arema away 1.34), Arema’s superior finishing (10% vs 8%) and greater number of shots on target (3.94 vs 3.44) lead me to the probability assessment: Arema 70%, draw 20%, home win 10%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators suggest a moderate chance against BTTS - both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 63% (PSBS 63% and Arema 63%), versus a league average of 52%. A strong signal against BTTS is PSBS form: in the last 5 matches they have scored 0 goals, conceded 19 (3.8 per match) and their recent attacking xG dropped to 0.78 compared to a seasonal xG of 1.46. Arema have 7 goals in their last 5 (1.4 per match), concede on average 1.4 and have a seasonal attacking xG of 1.34, so they are the more likely scorers against PSBS’s very unstable defense (PSBS have conceded 83 goals this season). Shot stats show PSBS average 4.5 shots on target per match with a 14% conversion rate, but recently this hasn’t translated into goals, while Arema average 3.94 shots on target with a 10% conversion and have better recent scoring form (7 goals in last 5). Given PSBS’s zero goals in the last 5 and Arema’s clear ability to score, I assign 70% to “no” (No BTTS) and 30% to “yes” (BTTS - Yes); recommendation: no.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG-based model: xG for PSBS is 1.46, xG for Arema is 1.34, xG against Arema 1.75 and against PSBS 1.37; averaging yields expected 1.61 goals for the home side and 1.36 for the away side, totaling 2.97 goals. Seasonal averages confirm offensive potential and defensive weaknesses: PSBS scores 1.69 and concedes 1.50 per match, Arema scores 1.13 and concedes 1.25, with PSBS suffering as many as 83 goals conceded this season versus 44 conceded by Arema. Percentage-wise Over 1.5 occurred in 88% of PSBS matches and 75% of Arema matches (avg ~82%), Over 2.5 respectively 75% and 44% (avg ~60%), and Over 3.5 31% and 25% (avg ~28%), which gives the strongest signal for the 1.5 line. Additionally, both teams scored in 63% of matches, hosts average 11.75 shots with a 14% conversion rate, and visitors 11.56 with a 10% conversion, supporting at least two goals. As a result I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable bet (≈82% probability); Over 2.5 is attractive (≈60%) but less certain, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (≈28%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal indicates the home side leading at half-time: PSBS led at the break in 7 matches (44%) and averages 0.63 goals in the first half versus Arema's 0.25, which favors the hosts in the opening 45 minutes. Over 90 minutes PSBS records 1.69 goals per match compared to Arema's 1.13 and has an xG of 1.46, while Arema concedes an average xG of 1.75, increasing the likelihood of home goals. Additionally, PSBS has better conversion (14% vs 10%) and more shots on target (4.5 vs 3.94), and their home win rate is 44% versus Arema’s 25% away win rate, which strengthens the scenario of maintaining the lead and securing the victory. However, form risk must be considered: in the last five matches the hosts’ form is 'lllll' and in those games they averaged 0 goals scored and 3.8 conceded, so half-time draw variants (1/X) and a full-time draw (X/X) remain a material risk.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 4
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
PSBS Biak NumforArema
12Shots24
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2Shots on target10
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.17xG2.9
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1Corners7
PSBS Biak NumforArema
37Dangerous attacks96
PSBS Biak NumforArema
9Fouls14
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3Cards2
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.91Goals scored / match1.41
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2.59Goals conceded / match1.38
PSBS Biak NumforArema
45%Average possession48%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3.47Shots on target / match4.22
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.53Shots per match11.66
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3.47Shots on target4.22
PSBS Biak NumforArema
8.6%Shot conversion12.1%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
45%Possession48%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.23xG for1.4
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2xG against1.56
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Shooting quality

PSBS Biak Numfor: BalancedArema: Balanced
PSBS Biak NumforArema
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PSBS Biak Numfor
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W19% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-22
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -54
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-10
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 3.8xG: 0.79Opponent xG: 2.67BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 60%
Arema
WDLLW
Season result split
34% W28% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-12
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.41 goals / match - Arema

Arema is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.59 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.38 goals / match - Arema

PSBS Biak Numfor scoring profile: strong

PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 32 matches).

29Goals scored (season)45
PSBS Biak NumforArema
83Goals conceded (season)44
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3.5Average goals in match2.78
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0Goals scored (last 5)7
PSBS Biak NumforArema
19Goals conceded (last 5)7
PSBS Biak NumforArema

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal81%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
25%2 goals44%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
6%3 goals13%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3%4 goals3%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal75%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
69%2 goals41%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
41%3 goals16%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
28%4 goals6%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
PSBS Biak Numfor - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 32 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time9%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
9%BTTS in both halves3%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
9%Scored in both halves19%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0%BTTS - last 520%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
66%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
44%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.31 pts / match - Arema

PSBS Biak Numfor - half-time state
9% leading47% draw44% trailing
Arema - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.31
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.44
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.03
PSBS Biak NumforArema
41%Clean sheet before half-time59%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
72%No goal before half-time59%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)1.66
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.97
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2.31Average goals (2nd half)1.75
PSBS Biak NumforArema
25%Clean sheet after half-time47%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
63%No goal after half-time41%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results

16% W22% R63% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-42
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arema - second-half results

47% W25% R28% P
42
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSBS Biak Numfor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.63.2
Average goals in match0.63.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-3-16
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSBS Biak Numfor
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
9
16-30
9
10
31-45
3
12
46-60
5
19
61-75
8
27
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (27). Late-goal balance (76-90): -19 - late phases are a weakness.

Arema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
5
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
10
6
46-60
6
4
61-75
15
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSBS Biak Numfor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
212%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSBS Biak NumforLigaArema
Average goals in match 3.502.76 2.78
Both teams scored 56%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 72%53% 59%
Clean sheets 9%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 66%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 84%82% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardPatrias Rumere
  2. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardClaudio Lucas Morais Ferreira dos Santos
  3. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardMohcine Hassan Nader
  4. AremaYellow cardIlham Rio Fahmi
  5. AremaSubstitutionOn: Jayus HarionoOff: Arkhan Fikri
  6. AremaSubstitutionOn: Dwiki MardiyantoOff: Gustavo Franca Amadio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PSBS Biak Numfor 0 - 0 - 1 Arema. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Arema
4 : 1
PSBS Biak Numfor

FAQ

What was the result of PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?

The Liga 1 match finished PSBS Biak Numfor 2:5 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?

PSBS Biak Numfor score 0.91 goals per game on average and Arema 1.41. The Liga 1 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 56% of PSBS Biak Numfor's matches and 63% of Arema's.

What form are PSBS Biak Numfor and Arema in?

Over the last 5 games PSBS Biak Numfor have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Arema 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.