PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: match statistics
PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSBS Biak Numfor play Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 15 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:5.
Current form
PSBS Biak Numfor: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSBS Biak Numfor scores 0.91 and concedes 2.79 goals per match. Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSBS Biak Numfor 56%, Arema 65%. Over 2.5: PSBS Biak Numfor 74%, Arema 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.21. PSBS Biak Numfor: 10.5 shots per match, Arema: 12.2.
Match halves
PSBS Biak Numfor: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.47. Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
PSBS Biak Numfor: 31-45+ (10 goals). Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Arema is the favorite in this match and I forecast an away win. Arema sits 10th with 11 wins and 45 goals this season, while PSBS Biak Numfor are 18th with only 4 wins and 29 goals. In their last 5 matches PSBS have not scored, lost all 5 and conceded 19 goals (3.8 per game), whereas Arema have scored 7 in their last 5 and are averaging 1.4 points per game over that stretch. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge: PSBS concede 2.25 goals per home game versus Arema conceding 1.25 on the road; additionally PSBS fail to score in 56% of home matches while Arema are goalless in only 25% of away fixtures. Despite similar xG (PSBS at home 1.38 vs Arema away 1.34), Arema’s superior finishing (10% vs 8%) and greater number of shots on target (3.94 vs 3.44) lead me to the probability assessment: Arema 70%, draw 20%, home win 10%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSBS Biak Numfor | Arema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arema is 71% better for: goals scored per match.
0.91 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.56 goals / match - Arema
Arema is 102% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.79 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.38 goals / match - Arema
PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — PSBS Biak Numfor
Over / Under — Arema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arema is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.71 pts / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.41 pts / match - Arema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Arema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 4.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -20 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (29). Late-goal balance (76-90): -21 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSBS Biak Numfor
Arema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSBS Biak Numfor | Liga | Arema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.71 | 2.80 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 74% | 54% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: PSBS Biak Numfor 0 - 0 - 1 Arema. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?
The Liga 1 match finished PSBS Biak Numfor 2:5 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?
PSBS Biak Numfor score 0.91 goals per game on average and Arema 1.56. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of PSBS Biak Numfor's matches and 65% of Arema's.
What form are PSBS Biak Numfor and Arema in?
Over the last 5 games PSBS Biak Numfor have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Arema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.