Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Malut United: match statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Malut United crest
Malut United

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Malut United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSIM Yogyakarta play Malut United in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Malut United: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Malut United scores 2.00 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSIM Yogyakarta 53%, Malut United 65%. Over 2.5: PSIM Yogyakarta 50%, Malut United 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Malut United has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.57. PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.2 shots per match, Malut United: 13.9.

Match halves

PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.79. Malut United: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.15.

Goals by minute

PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). Malut United: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Malut United are favorites due to a clear seasonal superiority: 66 goals scored versus PSIM’s 38 and 5th place in the table versus the hosts’ 10th. The difference in form is most evident over the last 5 matches — Malut have scored 14 goals while PSIM only 3, translating to 1.2 points per match for the visitors versus 0.2 for the hosts. Quality-of-chance metrics also favor Malut: the visitors average 4.67 shots on target and a 13% conversion rate away, while PSIM at home record 3.93 shots on target and 9% conversion, despite the hosts’ xG (1.56) being close to the visitors’ xG (1.52). Defensively both teams are similar (PSIM concedes 1.33 goals at home, Malut 1.20 away), but Malut’s overall goal differential (+23 on the season, +8 away) gives them the edge. Considering PSIM’s inefficiency (20% of home matches without a goal) and Malut’s superior attacking form, I assess probabilities as: 60% away win, 25% draw, 15% home win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

73Possession (%)27
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
14Shots5
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
6Shots on target1
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
1.98xG0.65
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
6Corners1
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
93Dangerous attacks35
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
14Fouls10
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
2Cards3
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
1.26Goals scored / match2
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
1.29Goals conceded / match1.56
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
59%Average possession51%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
4.41Shots on target / match5.59
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.18Shots per match13.91
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
4.41Shots on target5.59
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
9.6%Shot conversion14.4%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
59%Possession51%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
1.57xG for1.59
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
1.42xG against1.39
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedMalut United: Efficient finishing
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Malut United is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.4 pts / match - Malut United

PSIM Yogyakarta
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W35% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-11
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Malut United
WWLDL
Season result split
44% W24% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-11
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Malut United is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 2 goals / match - Malut United

PSIM Yogyakarta is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.56 goals / match - Malut United

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Malut United keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

Malut United scoring profile: very strong

Malut United scores in 85% of matches (29 of 34 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

43Goals scored (season)68
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
44Goals conceded (season)53
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
2.56Average goals in match3.56
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
5Goals scored (last 5)14
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
6Goals conceded (last 5)12
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal85%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
38%2 goals47%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
12%3 goals32%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
3%4 goals18%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal76%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
41%2 goals50%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
15%3 goals15%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
3%4 goals6%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time24%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
6%BTTS in both halves9%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
18%Scored in both halves32%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
40%BTTS - last 560%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Malut United is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.59 pts / match - Malut United

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
Malut United - half-time state
41% leading35% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.59
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.85
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.5
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
56%Clean sheet before half-time53%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
65%No goal before half-time41%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.53
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)1.15
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
1.59Average goals (2nd half)2.06
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
47%Clean sheet after half-time38%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United
44%No goal after half-time41%
PSIM YogyakartaMalut United

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

35% W32% R32% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Malut United - second-half results

41% W29% R29% P
54
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding107%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Malut United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.82.0
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match2.23.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
6
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Malut United
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
9
7
16-30
16
6
31-45
14
4
46-60
11
10
61-75
14
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Malut United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaMalut United
Average goals in match 2.562.80 3.56
Both teams scored 53%52% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%54% 62%
Clean sheets 29%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 62%72% 82%
Goal after half-time 79%81% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PSIM Yogyakarta 1 - 0 - 0 Malut United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Malut United
0 : 2
PSIM Yogyakarta

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Malut United?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 2:0 Malut United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Malut United?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.26 goals per game on average and Malut United 2.00. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 65% of Malut United's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Malut United in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Malut United 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Malut United?

The statistical background for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Malut United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.