PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persebaya Surabaya: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta presents solid home form with 50% wins and only 13% losses at their own stadium, recording an average of 1.38 goals scored and 1 goal conceded per match. Persebaya Surabaya stands out with excellent recent form featuring three consecutive victories, but they are significantly more cautious on the road, drawing as many as 63% of matches and scoring an average of only 0.75 goals. A key factor is the disparity in possession—the hosts control an average of 59% of the play, while the visitors manage just 47%, suggesting territorial advantage for PSIM. However, Persebaya's high draw rate away (63%) and their defensive stability (0.63 goals conceded per match) point to a likely scenario of splitting points. Considering the recent form of both teams and historical trends, a draw appears to be the most probable result of this evenly matched clash.
PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persebaya Surabaya: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIM Yogyakarta played Persebaya Surabaya in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Persebaya Surabaya: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.35 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Persebaya Surabaya scores 1.41 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIM Yogyakarta 47%, Persebaya Surabaya 59%. Over 2.5: PSIM Yogyakarta 41%, Persebaya Surabaya 35%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.28. PSIM Yogyakarta: 12.7 shots per match, Persebaya Surabaya: 10.0.
Match halves
PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.94. Persebaya Surabaya: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (7 goals). Persebaya Surabaya: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSIM Yogyakarta presents solid home form with 50% wins and only 13% losses at their own stadium, recording an average of 1.38 goals scored and 1 goal conceded per match. Persebaya Surabaya stands out with excellent recent form featuring three consecutive victories, but they are significantly more cautious on the road, drawing as many as 63% of matches and scoring an average of only 0.75 goals. A key factor is the disparity in possession—the hosts control an average of 59% of the play, while the visitors manage just 47%, suggesting territorial advantage for PSIM. However, Persebaya's high draw rate away (63%) and their defensive stability (0.63 goals conceded per match) point to a likely scenario of splitting points. Considering the recent form of both teams and historical trends, a draw appears to be the most probable result of this evenly matched clash.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Persebaya Surabaya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Persebaya Surabaya is 38% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 2.2 pts / match - Persebaya Surabaya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persebaya Surabaya is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.94 goals / match - Persebaya Surabaya
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Persebaya Surabaya keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Persebaya Surabaya scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
Over / Under - Persebaya Surabaya
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persebaya Surabaya is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.41 pts / match - Persebaya Surabaya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Persebaya Surabaya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIM Yogyakarta
Persebaya Surabaya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Liga | Persebaya Surabaya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.41 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 54% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 49% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 67% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: PSIM Yogyakarta 1 - 0 - 0 Persebaya Surabaya. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persebaya Surabaya?
The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 0:3 Persebaya Surabaya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persebaya Surabaya?
PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.35 goals per game on average and Persebaya Surabaya 1.41. The Liga 1 average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 47% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 59% of Persebaya Surabaya's.
What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Persebaya Surabaya in?
Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Persebaya Surabaya 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persebaya Surabaya?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.