PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persija: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persija: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIM Yogyakarta played Persija in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 22 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
PSIM Yogyakarta: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Persija: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.32 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Persija scores 1.82 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIM Yogyakarta 54%, Persija 46%. Over 2.5: PSIM Yogyakarta 54%, Persija 50%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Persija has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.57. PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.3 shots per match, Persija: 15.0.
Match halves
PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.89. Persija: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.18.
Goals by minute
PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). Persija: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Persija is the favorite in this fixture: they have scored 51 goals this season versus PSIM's 37 and conceded only 25 compared to the hosts' 37, and sit 3rd in the table versus PSIM's 11th. In their last five matches Persija scored 9 goals and averages 1.6 PPG, while PSIM has managed only 4 goals and averages 0.4 PPG, indicating superior form and efficiency from the visitors. Statistically Persija also holds an edge in chance quality: average xG For is 1.66 versus PSIM's 1.61, average shots on target per match are 5.5 vs 4.08, and conversion rate is 11% against the hosts' 10%. PSIM shows a clear advantage in possession (62% vs 55%) and a lower share of home clean sheets (15% vs 21%), but their defence concedes an average of 1.38 goals per home match versus Persija's 1.07 goals conceded away, which weakens the possession advantage. Considering league position, superior goal difference, higher number of shots on target and better PPG over the last 5 matches (1.6 vs 0.4), I expect a Persija win; therefore I assign them a 65% chance, 20% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% versus 38% for No. Supporting this view are recent forms: in the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of games, and the league-wide BTTS rate is 56%, which favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. From an xG and goals perspective, PSIM Yogyakarta averages 2.07 goals per match with xG 1.92, Persija averages 1.57 goals and xG 1.66; additionally Persija scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per match), while PSIM conceded 7 goals in those 5 matches (1.4 per match), increasing the likelihood of goal exchanges. The counterargument is PSIM’s better defense this season (0.71 goals conceded on average and 43% clean sheets versus Persija’s 36%), but an equal number of shots on target (5.5 vs 5.5) and higher home conversion rate (13% vs 11%) indicate scoring opportunities for both sides, so the Yes selection appears the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
PSIM averages 2.07 goals scored and concedes 0.71 per match this season; Persija scores 1.57 and concedes 1.07. xG is 1.92 for PSIM and 1.66 for Persija, with conceded xG of 0.87 (PSIM) and 1.11 (Persija). Balancing each team’s offense against the opponent’s defense ((1.92+1.11)/2 and (1.66+0.87)/2) yields expected goals of approximately 1.52 for the home side and 1.27 for the away side, total 2.79. A Poisson model with λ=2.79 estimates over 1.5 ≈77%, over 2.5 ≈53% and over 3.5 ≈31%. Additionally, PSIM has 100% of matches this season with >1.5 goals, Persija 64%, and both teams have Over2.5 in 60% of their last 5 matches, so the strongest data signal is a bet on over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data clearly show Persija more often led at the break: 8 instances (57%) versus PSIM’s 5 (36%), and the visitors scored 4 goals in the 0–15 minute window while the hosts scored 0, which increases the likelihood of Persija leading at Half-Time. PSIM Yogyakarta, however, dominates after the break — averaging 1.57 goals in the second half and winning the second half in 71% of matches, and scoring 10 goals in minutes 76–90 versus Persija’s 4, favoring a potential turnaround. Additionally, the hosts’ offensive metrics (xG 1.92 versus the visitors’ 1.66 and an average of 16.29 shots versus 13.71) suggest more scoring opportunities after the break. Although PSIM’s last five form is ‘ddlll’ (0 wins) and Persija’s is ‘ddlww’ (40% wins in the last five), the hosts’ season average points per game of 2.21 versus the visitors’ 1.93 overall supports a comeback by the home side; therefore I select HT/FT 2/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Persija | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Persija is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.6 pts / match - Persija
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persija is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.32 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.82 goals / match - Persija
Persija is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.89 goals / match - Persija
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Persija keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).
Persija scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
Over / Under - Persija
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persija is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.75 pts / match - Persija
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Persija - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIM Yogyakarta
Persija
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Liga | Persija | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.64 | 2.73 | • 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 56% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 54% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 25% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: PSIM Yogyakarta 0 - 0 - 1 Persija. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persija?
The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 1:1 Persija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persija?
PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.32 goals per game on average and Persija 1.82. The Liga 1 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 54% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 46% of Persija's.
What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Persija in?
Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Persija 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persija?
The statistical background for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persija — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.