PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta presents a significantly better home form with a 36% win rate and only 18% defeats at their own stadium, while Persijap in away matches wins only 9% of their games and loses a staggering 73%. The hosts remain undefeated in their last five matches with four draws and one victory, which proves their defensive solidity. A key factor is the advantage in Expected Goals - PSIM averages 1.7 xG in home matches against 1.3 xGA, whereas Persijap averages only 0.64 goals scored away against 2.09 goals conceded. The difference in goal difference is clear: the hosts have a zero balance in home matches, and the visitors a dramatic -16 on the road. Additionally, Persijap fails to score in 55% of away matches, which, combined with PSIM's solid defense (36% clean sheets), gives the hosts a clear advantage to secure a victory.
PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIM Yogyakarta played Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 11 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
PSIM Yogyakarta: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Persijap: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.38 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Persijap scores 0.83 and concedes 1.63. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIM Yogyakarta 50%, Persijap 50%. Over 2.5: PSIM Yogyakarta 50%, Persijap 54%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.42. PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.4 shots per match, Persijap: 11.6.
Match halves
PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00. Persijap: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). Persijap: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSIM Yogyakarta presents a significantly better home form with a 36% win rate and only 18% defeats at their own stadium, while Persijap in away matches wins only 9% of their games and loses a staggering 73%. The hosts remain undefeated in their last five matches with four draws and one victory, which proves their defensive solidity. A key factor is the advantage in Expected Goals - PSIM averages 1.7 xG in home matches against 1.3 xGA, whereas Persijap averages only 0.64 goals scored away against 2.09 goals conceded. The difference in goal difference is clear: the hosts have a zero balance in home matches, and the visitors a dramatic -16 on the road. Additionally, Persijap fails to score in 55% of away matches, which, combined with PSIM's solid defense (36% clean sheets), gives the hosts a clear advantage to secure a victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Persijap is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.6 pts / match - Persijap
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 66% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.83 goals / match - Persijap
PSIM Yogyakarta is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.63 goals / match - Persijap
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).
Persijap scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
Over / Under - Persijap
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.83 pts / match - Persijap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIM Yogyakarta
Persijap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Liga | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.63 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 26% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: PSIM Yogyakarta 0 - 1 - 0 Persijap. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap?
The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 2:2 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap?
PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.38 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.83. The Liga 1 average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 50% of Persijap's.
What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Persijap in?
Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Persijap 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.