PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIM Yogyakarta played PSBS Biak Numfor in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 29 December 2025. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. PSBS Biak Numfor: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.21 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. PSBS Biak Numfor scores 0.93 and concedes 2.14. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIM Yogyakarta 50%, PSBS Biak Numfor 57%. Over 2.5: PSIM Yogyakarta 36%, PSBS Biak Numfor 79%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.27. PSIM Yogyakarta: 11.8 shots per match, PSBS Biak Numfor: 10.6.
Match halves
PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.79. PSBS Biak Numfor: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (5 goals). PSBS Biak Numfor: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIM Yogyakarta | PSBS Biak Numfor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.2 pts / match - PSBS Biak Numfor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.93 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor
PSIM Yogyakarta is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 2.14 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 57% of matches (8 of 14 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
Over / Under - PSBS Biak Numfor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 139% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.57 pts / match - PSBS Biak Numfor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIM Yogyakarta
PSBS Biak Numfor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Liga | PSBS Biak Numfor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.36 | 2.60 | ▲ 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 57% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 50% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 24% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor?
The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 2:2 PSBS Biak Numfor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor?
PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.21 goals per game on average and PSBS Biak Numfor 0.93. The Liga 1 average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 57% of PSBS Biak Numfor's.
What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and PSBS Biak Numfor in?
Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and PSBS Biak Numfor 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.