PSIS Semarang vs Barito Putera: match statistics
PSIS Semarang vs Barito Putera: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIS Semarang played Barito Putera in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
PSIS Semarang: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Barito Putera: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIS Semarang scores 0.77 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Barito Putera scores 1.23 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.66 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIS Semarang 32%, Barito Putera 23%. Over 2.5: PSIS Semarang 45%, Barito Putera 23%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Barito Putera has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.19. PSIS Semarang: 7.8 shots per match, Barito Putera: 10.3.
Match halves
PSIS Semarang: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.45. Barito Putera: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
PSIS Semarang: 76-90+ (5 goals). Barito Putera: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match favorite is Barito Putera: the visitors have 12 wins and 27 goals scored with only 11 conceded this season, while PSIS have 5 wins, 17 scored and as many as 40 conceded. Barito's key advantage is their defense — away they concede an average of 0.64 goals per game and keep a clean sheet in 64% of matches, whereas PSIS at home concede 2.18 on average and have only 18% of games without conceding. PSIS generate more chances at home (57% possession, on average 12.3 shots and 5.5 on target with xG 1.69), but convert that into just 1.0 goal per match and fail to score in 55% of home games, which weakens the value of their chance creation. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 8 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Barito have 4 goals and 1.2 points, so in the short term PSIS looks better, but the season-long differences in goal balance and the visitors' defensive stability (27–11 vs 17–40) argue for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 27% (PSIS) and 18% (Barito), significantly below the league average of 49%, so both teams scoring is rare. Additionally, both sides record a clean sheet in 64% of matches, meaning in most games at least one team keeps a clean sheet, which strongly favors a No BTTS scenario. PSIS at home generates xG 1.41 with an average of 5.2 shots on target (12.1 shots overall), while Barito away has xG 1.13 and averages 3.27 shots on target, showing a home advantage in chance creation but limited attacking threat from the visitors. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 40%; PSIS scores 1.6 and concedes 1.0 on average, while Barito scores 0.8 and concedes 1.0, which presents moderate risk of an away goal but does not offset the seasonal trends. Considering the low seasonal BTTS (27%/18%) and high clean sheet rates (64%/64%), the strongest signal is No BTTS, therefore I recommend the "No" market.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis: PSIS has xG for 1.41, while Barito concedes xG 1.32 — averaging ~1.37 expected goals for the home side; Barito has xG for 1.13, and the hosts concede xG 0.71 — ~0.92 for the away side, totaling ~2.29 goals. A Poisson model with a mean of 2.29 suggests roughly a 67% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 40% for Over 2.5 goals and ~20% for Over 3.5 goals, which corresponds to the proposed distributions. However, seasonal figures weaken the over signal: PSIS has only 18% of matches above 2.5, Barito 27%, and both teams have 64% of matches with a clean sheet. Additionally, both teams record low both teams to score percentages (PSIS 27%, Barito 18%), and in the last 5 matches PSIS scored 8 goals (1.6 avg) and Barito 4 goals (0.8), therefore the strongest data signal is for Under 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PSIS holds a clear advantage across key metrics: home xG is 1.41 versus Barito’s 1.13, the hosts average 5.2 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 3.27, and they score 1.36 goals per home match while conceding only 0.36 on average, reflecting superior offense and defense. At half-time the hosts drew in 6 matches (55%) and led in 4 (36%), while the visitors were leading at the break in 5 fixtures (45%), so a draw at half-time is a frequent scenario. In second halves PSIS enjoys a significant edge — in 82% of matches the hosts’ second halves produced >0.5 goals and the hosts won the second half in 55% of cases, whereas Barito’s corresponding figures are 36% and 18%. Additionally, the hosts concede only 0.09 goals on average before the break, limiting Barito’s chances of a half-time lead but allowing PSIS to decide matches after the interval, hence the selection of a half-time draw and a full-time home win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIS Semarang | Barito Putera | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
PSIS Semarang is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.2 pts / match - Barito Putera
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barito Putera is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
0.77 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.23 goals / match - Barito Putera
Barito Putera is 264% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.82 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.5 goals / match - Barito Putera
PSIS Semarang scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while Barito Putera keeps a clean sheet in 64% (14 of 22 matches).
Barito Putera scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIS Semarang
Over / Under - Barito Putera
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barito Putera is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.64 pts / match - Barito Putera
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIS Semarang - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Barito Putera - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIS Semarang
Barito Putera
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSIS Semarang | Liga | Barito Putera | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.59 | 2.66 | ▼ 1.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 48% | ▼ 23% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 47% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 30% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 67% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): PSIS Semarang 0 - 0 - 2 Barito Putera. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Barito Putera?
The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 0:1 Barito Putera. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PSIS Semarang and Barito Putera?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSIS Semarang won 0, Barito Putera won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Barito Putera?
PSIS Semarang score 0.77 goals per game on average and Barito Putera 1.23. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 32% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 23% of Barito Putera's.
What form are PSIS Semarang and Barito Putera in?
Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Barito Putera 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Barito Putera?
The statistical background for PSIS Semarang vs Barito Putera — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


