PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics
PSIS Semarang is displaying very poor home form with 75% losses and only 25% wins at home, conceding an average of 2.38 goals per match. Despite a 100% loss rate on the road this season, Kendal Tornado shows much better recent general form (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts) and a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in 6 away matches). The hosts have the advantage in possession (55% vs 46%) and higher xG (1.59 vs 0.89), however, their catastrophic conversion rate (6%) and -15 goal difference in home matches are alarming. Considering the weakness of both teams in scoring goals (averaging 0.5 goals per match each) and the fact that both frequently fail to score, I expect a low score and a draw as the most probable scenario.
PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIS Semarang played Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 30 January 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
PSIS Semarang: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kendal Tornado: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIS Semarang scores 0.53 and concedes 2.06 goals per match. Kendal Tornado scores 1.57 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.66 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIS Semarang 29%, Kendal Tornado 43%. Over 2.5: PSIS Semarang 47%, Kendal Tornado 57%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.13. PSIS Semarang: 6.6 shots per match, Kendal Tornado: 8.7.
Match halves
PSIS Semarang: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.29. Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
PSIS Semarang: 16-30 (2 goals). Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSIS Semarang is displaying very poor home form with 75% losses and only 25% wins at home, conceding an average of 2.38 goals per match. Despite a 100% loss rate on the road this season, Kendal Tornado shows much better recent general form (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts) and a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in 6 away matches). The hosts have the advantage in possession (55% vs 46%) and higher xG (1.59 vs 0.89), however, their catastrophic conversion rate (6%) and -15 goal difference in home matches are alarming. Considering the weakness of both teams in scoring goals (averaging 0.5 goals per match each) and the fact that both frequently fail to score, I expect a low score and a draw as the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIS Semarang | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kendal Tornado is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 2 pts / match - Kendal Tornado
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 196% better for: goals scored per match.
0.53 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.57 goals / match - Kendal Tornado
Kendal Tornado is 140% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.06 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.86 goals / match - Kendal Tornado
PSIS Semarang scores in 47% of matches (8 of 17 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
Kendal Tornado scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIS Semarang
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kendal Tornado is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.86 pts / match - Kendal Tornado
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIS Semarang - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIS Semarang
Kendal Tornado
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSIS Semarang | Liga | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.59 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 47% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 30% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 69% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: PSIS Semarang 0 - 0 - 1 Kendal Tornado. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?
The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 0:3 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?
PSIS Semarang score 0.53 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.57. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 29% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 43% of Kendal Tornado's.
What form are PSIS Semarang and Kendal Tornado in?
Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.