Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics

PSIS Semarang crest
PSIS Semarang
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Kendal Tornado crest
Kendal Tornado
135%(3.46)
X40%(4.00)
225%(1.75)

PSIS Semarang is displaying very poor home form with 75% losses and only 25% wins at home, conceding an average of 2.38 goals per match. Despite a 100% loss rate on the road this season, Kendal Tornado shows much better recent general form (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts) and a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in 6 away matches). The hosts have the advantage in possession (55% vs 46%) and higher xG (1.59 vs 0.89), however, their catastrophic conversion rate (6%) and -15 goal difference in home matches are alarming. Considering the weakness of both teams in scoring goals (averaging 0.5 goals per match each) and the fact that both frequently fail to score, I expect a low score and a draw as the most probable scenario.

PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSIS Semarang play Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 30 January 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

PSIS Semarang: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kendal Tornado: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSIS Semarang scores 0.81 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. Kendal Tornado scores 1.82 and concedes 0.59. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSIS Semarang 33%, Kendal Tornado 29%. Over 2.5: PSIS Semarang 48%, Kendal Tornado 53%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.11. PSIS Semarang: 7.5 shots per match, Kendal Tornado: 9.2.

Match halves

PSIS Semarang: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.48. Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.24.

Goals by minute

PSIS Semarang: 76-90+ (7 goals). Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

PSIS Semarang is displaying very poor home form with 75% losses and only 25% wins at home, conceding an average of 2.38 goals per match. Despite a 100% loss rate on the road this season, Kendal Tornado shows much better recent general form (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts) and a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in 6 away matches). The hosts have the advantage in possession (55% vs 46%) and higher xG (1.59 vs 0.89), however, their catastrophic conversion rate (6%) and -15 goal difference in home matches are alarming. Considering the weakness of both teams in scoring goals (averaging 0.5 goals per match each) and the fact that both frequently fail to score, I expect a low score and a draw as the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
8Shots16
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1Shots on target5
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
0.85xG1.69
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
2Corners3
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
38Dangerous attacks48
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
-1Fouls-1
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
3Cards1
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
0.81Goals scored / match1.82
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1.85Goals conceded / match0.59
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
46%Average possession50%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
3.19Shots on target / match5.59
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.48Shots per match9.24
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
3.19Shots on target5.59
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
10.9%Shot conversion19.7%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
46%Possession50%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1.11xG for1.42
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1.49xG against0.97
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

Shooting quality

PSIS Semarang: BalancedKendal Tornado: Efficient finishing
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
Accuracy (shots on target)43%60%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kendal Tornado is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.8 pts / match - Kendal Tornado

PSIS Semarang
LDLWL
Season result split
22% W19% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-16
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-8
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kendal Tornado
LWWLW
Season result split
53% W24% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-4
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 0.77BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kendal Tornado is 125% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.82 goals / match - Kendal Tornado

Kendal Tornado is 214% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.85 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.59 goals / match - Kendal Tornado

PSIS Semarang scoring profile: more difficult

PSIS Semarang scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 matches).

Kendal Tornado scoring profile: strong

Kendal Tornado scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

22Goals scored (season)31
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
50Goals conceded (season)10
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
2.67Average goals in match2.41
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
5Goals scored (last 5)10
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
10Goals conceded (last 5)2
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

How often they score at least...

52%1 goal65%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
11%2 goals53%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
7%3 goals35%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
4%4 goals24%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal47%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
52%2 goals6%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
37%3 goals6%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
15%4 goals0%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time0%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
11%Scored in both halves35%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
40%BTTS - last 50%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kendal Tornado is 109% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.94 pts / match - Kendal Tornado

PSIS Semarang - half-time state
22% leading26% draw52% trailing
Kendal Tornado - half-time state
47% leading53% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.94
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.59
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1.07Average goals (1st half)0.59
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
44%Clean sheet before half-time100%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
74%No goal before half-time53%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per match (2nd half)1.47
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)1.24
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.82
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
44%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado
63%No goal after half-time47%
PSIS SemarangKendal Tornado

PSIS Semarang - second-half results

22% W30% R48% P
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kendal Tornado - second-half results

35% W41% R24% P
33
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIS Semarang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kendal Tornado - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSIS Semarang
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
5
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

Kendal Tornado
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
0
31-45
5
4
46-60
9
0
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSIS Semarang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Kendal Tornado

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
36%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSIS SemarangLigaKendal Tornado
Average goals in match 2.672.79 2.41
Both teams scored 33%51% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 53%
Clean sheets 22%28% 53%
Goal before half-time 78%70% 47%
Goal after half-time 74%79% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PSIS Semarang 1 - 0 - 1 Kendal Tornado. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

PSIS Semarang
1 : 0
Kendal Tornado
Kendal Tornado
4 : 1
PSIS Semarang

FAQ

What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?

The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 0:3 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSIS Semarang and Kendal Tornado?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSIS Semarang won 1, Kendal Tornado won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?

PSIS Semarang score 0.81 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.82. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 33% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 29% of Kendal Tornado's.

What form are PSIS Semarang and Kendal Tornado in?

Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.