Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 06 September 2026

PSIS Semarang vs Persipal: match statistics

PSIS Semarang crest
PSIS Semarang
6 : 1half-time 2:0
Persipal crest
Persipal

PSIS Semarang vs Persipal: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSIS Semarang played Persipal in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 6:1.

Current form

PSIS Semarang: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Persipal: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSIS Semarang scores 0.52 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Persipal scores 0.57 and concedes 2.52. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSIS Semarang 29%, Persipal 48%. Over 2.5: PSIS Semarang 43%, Persipal 62%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

PSIS Semarang has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.11. PSIS Semarang: 7.2 shots per match, Persipal: 8.0.

Match halves

PSIS Semarang: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.29. Persipal: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

PSIS Semarang: 16-30 (3 goals). Persipal: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSIS Semarang appear favored due to clearly superior offensive and defensive metrics: higher xG (1.59 vs 0.85), more shots and greater possession. Hosts also have better last-5 form (PPG 1.6) and have won matches this season, while Persipal have yet to win away. Visitors have major defensive issues (avg 3.1 GA away, season GA 53) and a high loss rate. Given low finishing from both sides a low-scoring game is likely, but the home advantage should be enough for victory. I consider a home win most probable, with moderate draw probability and low chance of an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Stats indicate strong tendency for both teams to concede — PSIS Semarang concedes 2.0 avg, Persipal 3.1, with Persipal conceding 15 in last 5. PSIS posts higher xG (1.36) and more shots (10.8 vs 6.0), giving realistic scoring chances against a weak defense. Clean sheet rates are low (home 18%, away 0%), suggesting rare goalless matches. Season BTTS are mixed (PSIS 64%, Persipal 30%), but overall defensive frailty and visitors’ poor form (llldl) strengthen BTTS = YES.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Stats indicate high scoring potential: xG 1.36 (home) and 0.85 (away) total 2.21 xG, strongly suggesting more than 1.5 goals. Both teams have defensive issues (ga_season_home 39, ga_season_away 53) and high Over 1.5 rates (home 82%, away 100%). PSIS creates far more chances (shotsAVG_home 10.8 vs 6.0), increasing scoring probability. Persipal, despite lower efficiency, frequently participates in matches with at least two goals, supporting Over 1.5. Data point to Over 1.5 as the most probable and safest bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PSIS Semarang have better form, higher xG and more on-target shots, while Persipal display very poor results and a high loss rate. HT stats show frequent draws and a moderate number of first-half goals (high over0.5 HT). In the second half hosts more often take points and have superior ppg and offensive metrics, suggesting a turnaround after the break. Due to the HT draw combination and PSIS’s second-half edge, I recommend HT/FT X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
4 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
PSIS SemarangPersipal
20Shots8
PSIS SemarangPersipal
12Shots on target3
PSIS SemarangPersipal
2.47xG0.83
PSIS SemarangPersipal
8Corners1
PSIS SemarangPersipal
53Dangerous attacks15
PSIS SemarangPersipal
-1Fouls-1
PSIS SemarangPersipal
4Cards0
PSIS SemarangPersipal

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSIS SemarangPersipal
0.52Goals scored / match0.57
PSIS SemarangPersipal
1.86Goals conceded / match2.52
PSIS SemarangPersipal
44%Average possession44%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
3.1Shots on target / match3.33
PSIS SemarangPersipal

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.19Shots per match7.95
PSIS SemarangPersipal
3.1Shots on target3.33
PSIS SemarangPersipal
7.3%Shot conversion7.2%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
44%Possession44%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
1.12xG for1.11
PSIS SemarangPersipal
1.55xG against1.88
PSIS SemarangPersipal

Shooting quality

PSIS Semarang: BalancedPersipal: Balanced
PSIS SemarangPersipal
Accuracy (shots on target)43%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PSIS Semarang is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.2 pts / match - Persipal

PSIS Semarang
WLDWD
Season result split
19% W19% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-13
0.76 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Persipal
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-7-14
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-9
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 2.08BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Persipal is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.52 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.57 goals / match - Persipal

PSIS Semarang is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.86 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 2.52 goals / match - Persipal

PSIS Semarang scoring profile: strong

PSIS Semarang scores in 48% of matches (10 of 21 matches), while Persipal keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).

Persipal scoring profile: mixed

Persipal scores in 48% of matches (10 of 21 matches), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

11Goals scored (season)12
PSIS SemarangPersipal
39Goals conceded (season)53
PSIS SemarangPersipal
2.38Average goals in match3.1
PSIS SemarangPersipal
3Goals scored (last 5)4
PSIS SemarangPersipal
4Goals conceded (last 5)15
PSIS SemarangPersipal

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal48%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
5%2 goals10%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
0%3 goals0%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
0%4 goals0%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal90%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
52%2 goals71%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
33%3 goals57%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
19%4 goals29%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time19%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
0%BTTS in both halves5%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
5%Scored in both halves10%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
20%BTTS - last 580%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIS Semarang is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.67 pts / match - Persipal

PSIS Semarang - half-time state
19% leading29% draw52% trailing
Persipal - half-time state
10% leading38% draw52% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)0.67
PSIS SemarangPersipal
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.29
PSIS SemarangPersipal
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)1.05
PSIS SemarangPersipal
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.33
PSIS SemarangPersipal
43%Clean sheet before half-time33%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
76%No goal before half-time71%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

After half-time (2nd half)

0.9Points per match (2nd half)0.33
PSIS SemarangPersipal
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
PSIS SemarangPersipal
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)1.48
PSIS SemarangPersipal
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.76
PSIS SemarangPersipal
48%Clean sheet after half-time19%
PSIS SemarangPersipal
71%No goal after half-time71%
PSIS SemarangPersipal

PSIS Semarang - second-half results

19% W33% R48% P
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persipal - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-25
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIS Semarang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Persipal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.82.2
Average goals in match1.22.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSIS Semarang
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
7
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

Persipal
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
12
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
8
61-75
3
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSIS Semarang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
34%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
168%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Persipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
51%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
166%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSIS SemarangLigaPersipal
Average goals in match 2.382.64 3.10
Both teams scored 29%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%47% 62%
Clean sheets 24%30% 10%
Goal before half-time 76%68% 76%
Goal after half-time 71%77% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIS SemarangGoalAlbeto Goncalves Da CostaAssist: Gustur Cahyo
  2. PSIS SemarangGoalEsteban Gabriel Vizcarra
  3. PSIS SemarangSubstitutionOn: Ocvian ChanigioOff: Tegar Infantri
  4. PSIS SemarangAssistOcvian Chanigio
  5. PSIS SemarangYellow cardEsteban Gabriel Vizcarra
  6. PSIS SemarangSubstitutionOn: Wawan FebriantoOff: Esteban Gabriel Vizcarra
  7. PSIS SemarangGoalOtavio Dutra
  8. PSIS SemarangRed cardRizky Darmawan
  9. PSIS SemarangYellow cardOcvian Chanigio

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PSIS Semarang 1 - 1 - 0 Persipal. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

PSIS Semarang
2 : 0
Persipal
Persipal
1 : 1
PSIS Semarang

FAQ

What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Persipal?

The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 6:1 Persipal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSIS Semarang and Persipal?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSIS Semarang won 1, Persipal won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Persipal?

PSIS Semarang score 0.52 goals per game on average and Persipal 0.57. The Liga 2 average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 29% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 48% of Persipal's.

What form are PSIS Semarang and Persipal in?

Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Persipal 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Persipal?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.