PSIS Semarang vs Persipal: match statistics
PSIS Semarang vs Persipal: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSIS Semarang play Persipal in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 29 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 6:1.
Current form
PSIS Semarang: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Persipal: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSIS Semarang scores 0.81 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. Persipal scores 0.70 and concedes 3.33. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSIS Semarang 33%, Persipal 52%. Over 2.5: PSIS Semarang 48%, Persipal 70%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Persipal has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.11. PSIS Semarang: 7.5 shots per match, Persipal: 8.2.
Match halves
PSIS Semarang: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.48. Persipal: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
PSIS Semarang: 76-90+ (7 goals). Persipal: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
PSIS Semarang appear favored due to clearly superior offensive and defensive metrics: higher xG (1.59 vs 0.85), more shots and greater possession. Hosts also have better last-5 form (PPG 1.6) and have won matches this season, while Persipal have yet to win away. Visitors have major defensive issues (avg 3.1 GA away, season GA 53) and a high loss rate. Given low finishing from both sides a low-scoring game is likely, but the home advantage should be enough for victory. I consider a home win most probable, with moderate draw probability and low chance of an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSIS Semarang | Persipal | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIS Semarang is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.7 goals / match - Persipal
PSIS Semarang is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.85 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 3.33 goals / match - Persipal
PSIS Semarang scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Persipal keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 matches).
Persipal scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — PSIS Semarang
Over / Under — Persipal
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSIS Semarang is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.52 pts / match - Persipal
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIS Semarang - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Persipal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Average goals in match | 4.0 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -16 | -9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (26). Late-goal balance (76-90): -21 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSIS Semarang
Persipal
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSIS Semarang | Liga | Persipal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.67 | 2.79 | ▲ 4.04 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 51% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 49% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 28% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 70% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 79% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): PSIS Semarang 1 - 1 - 0 Persipal. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Persipal?
The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 6:1 Persipal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PSIS Semarang and Persipal?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSIS Semarang won 1, Persipal won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Persipal?
PSIS Semarang score 0.81 goals per game on average and Persipal 0.70. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 33% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 52% of Persipal's.
What form are PSIS Semarang and Persipal in?
Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persipal 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Persipal?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.