PSM vs Bhayangkara: match statistics
PSM vs Bhayangkara: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSM played Bhayangkara in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 4 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
PSM: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Bhayangkara: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSM scores 1.20 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Bhayangkara scores 1.37 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSM 60%, Bhayangkara 57%. Over 2.5: PSM 40%, Bhayangkara 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
PSM has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.29. PSM: 11.0 shots per match, Bhayangkara: 10.5.
Match halves
PSM: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Bhayangkara: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
PSM: 76-90+ (10 goals). Bhayangkara: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). PSM has an advantage in chance creation at home — averaging 11.87 shots and 3.8 on target per match with xG 1.35, versus Bhayangkara’s 9.67 shots, 3.33 on target and xG 1.20 away. Defensively the hosts also perform better: PSM concedes 1.2 goals on average at home, while the visitors concede 1.53 goals away and have a negative away goal difference of -7 and a 53% away loss rate. Bhayangkara sit higher in the table (7th vs 13th) and have more wins this season (14 vs 7) and 9 goals in the last five matches compared to PSM’s 7, but they have also conceded 11 goals in that period, which undermines their defensive credibility. Considering the superior xG (1.35 vs 1.20), higher shot volume (11.87 vs 9.67) and lower average goals conceded (1.2 vs 1.53), I give PSM a 45% chance to win, draw 30% and Bhayangkara 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome based on seasonal and league trends: PSM has a seasonal BTTS rate of 60%, Bhayangkara 53%, versus a league average of 54%. The signal from the last 5 matches is even stronger — PSM has BTTS in 80% of its last 5, Bhayangkara in 100%, with average goals in those five matches of 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded (PSM) and 1.8 scored and 2.2 conceded (Bhayangkara), indicating both teams have been both scoring and conceding recently. Quality-of-chance analysis points the same way: xG for PSM is 1.39 versus 1.20 for Bhayangkara, and xG against is 1.18 (PSM) and 1.58 (Bhayangkara); shots on target 3.87 vs 3.33 and conversion rate 15% vs 11% — PSM is more efficient at converting chances while Bhayangkara generates and concedes a lot of xG. Counterarguments exist: PSM has a season clean sheet rate of 33%, and Bhayangkara fail to score in 33% of matches, which lowers certainty for both teams to score; however, PSM fails to score in only 7% of matches and the recent BTTS runs (80%/100%) favor both teams finding the net. In summary, given the 60%/53% seasonal BTTS, 80%/100% in the last 5 matches, and supporting xG and shot metrics, the 'Yes' scenario appears significantly more likely than 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
After matching attack vs defense I calculate expected goals: PSM ~1.49 (xG 1.39 vs opponents xG conceded 1.58) and Bhayangkara ~1.19 (xG 1.20 vs home defense 1.18), totaling ~2.68 goals. PSM averages 11.27 shots with 3.87 on target and a 15% conversion, Bhayangkara records 9.67 shots with 3.33 on target and an 11% conversion, which supports goal production. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred for PSM in 80% of matches and for Bhayangkara in 73%, while the league goals average is 2.74 per match (consistent with the projected 2.68). In the last 5 matches PSM scores 1.4 goals on average, Bhayangkara 1.8 (7 and 9 goals in 5), with over 2.5 appearing in 60% of PSM games and 100% of Bhayangkara games, and clean sheets are rare (33% and 20%). Therefore the best signal is Over at the 1.5 line — I estimate ~75% chance of at least 2 goals (vs ~50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5), driven by the projected 2.68 goals and high season Over1.5 rates (80%/73%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PSM has the advantage at the break: the hosts led at half-time in 8 matches (53%) versus 6 (40%) for Bhayangkara, and both teams average 0.67 goals by half-time. Over the full match PSM scores more and more efficiently — average goals 1.67 versus 1.07 for the visitors, hosts’ xG 1.39 versus 1.20 for Bhayangkara, and lower xG against (1.18 vs 1.58), indicating higher-quality chances and better defence. The hosts average 11.27 shots and 3.87 on target with a conversion rate of 15% versus 9.67 shots, 3.33 on target and 11% conversion for the visitors, so the greater volume and quality of attempts increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. Additionally, in second halves PSM scores on average 1.0 goal (vs 0.4 for Bhayangkara) and has better second-half points (27 vs 15), which supports holding the advantage and a home victory. For these reasons the strongest signal is the scenario of PSM leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1), which I assign roughly a 39% probability; as alternatives I consider draw/home win (X/1 ~14%) and draw/draw (X/X 10%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSM | Bhayangkara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
PSM is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - PSM · 1.2 pts / match - Bhayangkara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bhayangkara is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - PSM · 1.37 goals / match - Bhayangkara
Bhayangkara is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.37 goals / match - PSM · 1.27 goals / match - Bhayangkara
PSM scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Bhayangkara keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
Bhayangkara scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while PSM keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSM
Over / Under - Bhayangkara
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bhayangkara is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - PSM · 1.6 pts / match - Bhayangkara
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Bhayangkara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSM
Bhayangkara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSM | Liga | Bhayangkara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.57 | 2.74 | ▼ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 26% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 70% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 82% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: PSM 0 - 1 - 0 Bhayangkara. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSM vs Bhayangkara?
The Liga 1 match finished PSM 2:1 Bhayangkara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSM vs Bhayangkara?
PSM score 1.20 goals per game on average and Bhayangkara 1.37. The Liga 1 average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 60% of PSM's matches and 57% of Bhayangkara's.
What form are PSM and Bhayangkara in?
Over the last 5 games PSM have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Bhayangkara 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSM vs Bhayangkara?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSM vs Bhayangkara: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


