PSMS vs Adhyaksa: match statistics
PSMS vs Adhyaksa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
PSMS played Adhyaksa in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
PSMS: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Adhyaksa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
PSMS scores 1.24 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Adhyaksa scores 2.36 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: PSMS 60%, Adhyaksa 68%. Over 2.5: PSMS 40%, Adhyaksa 56%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Adhyaksa has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.35. PSMS: 9.6 shots per match, Adhyaksa: 12.2.
Match halves
PSMS: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.72. Adhyaksa: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
PSMS: 0-15 (8 goals). Adhyaksa: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (PSMS) based on their strong home defense: PSMS have won 58% of home matches, concede only 0.75 goals per game on average and keep 33% clean sheets. Adhyaksa sit top of the table (1st) with 14 wins and 59 goals this season; in the last 5 matches they scored 10 goals and average 2 points per match, whereas PSMS scored 5 goals in that period and average 1 point per match. Looking at xG, PSMS produce 1.18 home xG per game with 0.77 xG against, while Adhyaksa on the road have 1.30 xG with 1.19 xG against, which suggests the hosts effectively limit opponents’ quality chances. Additionally PSMS convert shots better at home (17% conversion with 5.11 SOT) compared to Adhyaksa away (12% and 4.82 SOT), so I expect an even, low-scoring game with a slight home advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams point to BTTS: the home side have 77% of matches with both teams scoring this season, the visitors 58% (league average 50%), indicating a tilt toward a both-teams-to-score scenario. In the last 5 matches the visitors had BTTS in 80% of games, the hosts in 60%, and recent form shows 5 goals (hosts) vs 10 goals (visitors) in the last 5, so the visitors have more frequently recorded Goal/Goal fixtures recently. Offensively both teams create chances — hosts average 3.38 goals-shot metric per match with xG 1.89 and a 22% conversion from 15.46 shots, while visitors register 1.25 goals with xG 1.30 from 9.45 shots and a 12% conversion, so both sides are capable of producing scoring opportunities. Defensively both teams concede — hosts 1.38 goals per match (xG against 1.13), visitors 1.17 (xG against 1.19) and both have low clean sheet expected rates of 15% and 25%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on this I pick BTTS - Yes with a confidence of 78% versus 22% for No, because the numbers (77%/58% season BTTS, 60%/80% in last 5, low clean sheet rates and conceded averages 1.38 and 1.17) strongly support a both-teams-to-score outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
PSMS scores an average of 3.38 goals per match and registers 15.46 shots (6.38 on target) with a 22% conversion, while Adhyaksa averages 1.25 goals per match, 9.45 shots (4.82 on target) and a 12% conversion, giving the hosts a clear offensive edge. xG corroborates this moderately: PSMS attack xG is 1.89 versus Adhyaksa defense xG 1.19 (estimate 1.54 goals for the hosts), and conversely 1.30 vs 1.13 yields 1.22 for the visitors — total = 2.76 expected goals. Seasonal percentages show PSMS had Over 1.5 in 92% of matches, Adhyaksa in 75%; Over 2.5 occurred in 69% of the hosts' games and 42% for the visitors, which raises the likelihood of at least 1.5 goals being exceeded. Based on cumulative xG=2.76 the Poisson model estimates approximately Over 1.5 ≈76%, Over 2.5 ≈52% and Over 3.5 ≈30%. Therefore the strongest and safest signal is to back over 1.5 (line 1.5, side 'over') combined with PSMS's high average goals scored (3.38), Adhyaksa's low average goals conceded (1.17) and the estimated total of 2.76.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PSMS led at half-time in 62% of matches and averages 1.77 goals by the break, while Adhyaksa averages only 0.50 goals by half-time; PSMS has 30 first-half goals versus 14 for the visitors. Over 90 minutes PSMS averages 3.38 goals with an xG of 1.89 and 6.38 shots on target, whereas Adhyaksa has 1.25 goals, xG 1.30 and 4.82 shots on target; PSMS conversion rate is 22% versus 12% for the opponent, indicating a clear offensive advantage. PSMS has scored 9 goals in minutes 0–15 compared to 2 for Adhyaksa, and the visitors concede on average 0.67 goals by half-time, so an early lead for the hosts is highly likely; additionally PSMS wins 69% of home matches vs 42% wins for Adhyaksa. Although Adhyaksa has a better record in the last 5 matches (60% wins vs 20% for PSMS), the seasonal HT metrics, higher xG and greater number of shots on target lead me to believe the PSMS lead at the break will be converted into a full-time victory, hence the highest probability is assigned to the 1/1 scenario (lead at half-time and win at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| PSMS | Adhyaksa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Adhyaksa is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - PSMS · 2 pts / match - Adhyaksa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Adhyaksa is 90% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - PSMS · 2.36 goals / match - Adhyaksa
PSMS is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - PSMS · 1.28 goals / match - Adhyaksa
PSMS scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Adhyaksa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
Adhyaksa scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while PSMS keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSMS
Over / Under - Adhyaksa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Adhyaksa is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - PSMS · 1.64 pts / match - Adhyaksa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSMS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Adhyaksa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
PSMS
Adhyaksa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSMS | Liga | Adhyaksa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.40 | 2.73 | ▲ 3.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 69% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- AdhyaksaYellow cardMuhamad Al Gazani Dwi Sugandi
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): PSMS 1 - 1 - 0 Adhyaksa. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of PSMS vs Adhyaksa?
The Liga 2 match finished PSMS 1:1 Adhyaksa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PSMS and Adhyaksa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSMS won 1, Adhyaksa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PSMS vs Adhyaksa?
PSMS score 1.24 goals per game on average and Adhyaksa 2.36. The Liga 2 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of PSMS's matches and 68% of Adhyaksa's.
What form are PSMS and Adhyaksa in?
Over the last 5 games PSMS have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Adhyaksa 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSMS vs Adhyaksa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSMS vs Adhyaksa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


