Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 06 September 2026

PSPS vs Persekat: match statistics

PSPS crest
PSPS
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Persekat crest
Persekat
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

As hosts, PSPS holds a clear advantage in this clash. The home team shows solid form at their own stadium with a goal difference of 0 and a scoring efficiency of 11%, while Persekat has a negative goal difference of -8 and a very poor efficiency of just 7% in away matches. The hosts average 1.14 goals per home match, whereas the visitors score only 0.5 goals away and fail to find the net in 50% of their matches. PSPS also possesses better possession statistics (52% vs 48%) and a significantly higher number of shots on goal (6.14 vs 2.86). Although Persekat shows better recent overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), their weakness on the road (63% loss rate) argues for a home victory. A draw remains a realistic option due to the high number of draws for PSPS at home (43%), but the statistical advantage gives the hosts the best chance of triumph.

PSPS vs Persekat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSPS played Persekat in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 16 January 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

PSPS: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Persekat: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSPS scores 1.60 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Persekat scores 0.73 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSPS 60%, Persekat 33%. Over 2.5: PSPS 53%, Persekat 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

PSPS has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.41. PSPS: 9.3 shots per match, Persekat: 9.7.

Match halves

PSPS: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.93. Persekat: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

PSPS: 76-90+ (8 goals). Persekat: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

As hosts, PSPS holds a clear advantage in this clash. The home team shows solid form at their own stadium with a goal difference of 0 and a scoring efficiency of 11%, while Persekat has a negative goal difference of -8 and a very poor efficiency of just 7% in away matches. The hosts average 1.14 goals per home match, whereas the visitors score only 0.5 goals away and fail to find the net in 50% of their matches. PSPS also possesses better possession statistics (52% vs 48%) and a significantly higher number of shots on goal (6.14 vs 2.86). Although Persekat shows better recent overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), their weakness on the road (63% loss rate) argues for a home victory. A draw remains a realistic option due to the high number of draws for PSPS at home (43%), but the statistical advantage gives the hosts the best chance of triumph.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
PSPSPersekat
11Shots8
PSPSPersekat
5Shots on target2
PSPSPersekat
1.36xG0.95
PSPSPersekat
2Corners7
PSPSPersekat
44Dangerous attacks42
PSPSPersekat
8Fouls10
PSPSPersekat
1Cards2
PSPSPersekat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match0.73
PSPSPersekat
2Goals conceded / match1.27
PSPSPersekat
45%Average possession45%
PSPSPersekat
5.4Shots on target / match4.27
PSPSPersekat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.27Shots per match9.73
PSPSPersekat
5.4Shots on target4.27
PSPSPersekat
17.3%Shot conversion7.5%
PSPSPersekat
45%Possession45%
PSPSPersekat
1.54xG for1.41
PSPSPersekat
1.42xG against1.48
PSPSPersekat

Shooting quality

PSPS: Counter-attackingPersekat: Balanced
PSPSPersekat
Accuracy (shots on target)58%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Persekat is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - PSPS · 1.6 pts / match - Persekat

PSPS
DLLWL
Season result split
27% W33% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-6
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Persekat
DLWDW
Season result split
27% W33% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-6
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSPS is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - PSPS · 0.73 goals / match - Persekat

Persekat is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - PSPS · 1.27 goals / match - Persekat

PSPS scoring profile: strong

PSPS scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Persekat keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Persekat scoring profile: strong

Persekat scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while PSPS keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

24Goals scored (season)11
PSPSPersekat
30Goals conceded (season)19
PSPSPersekat
3.6Average goals in match2
PSPSPersekat
10Goals scored (last 5)4
PSPSPersekat
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
PSPSPersekat

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal60%
PSPSPersekat
47%2 goals13%
PSPSPersekat
27%3 goals0%
PSPSPersekat
7%4 goals0%
PSPSPersekat

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
PSPSPersekat
53%2 goals40%
PSPSPersekat
33%3 goals20%
PSPSPersekat
13%4 goals7%
PSPSPersekat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time7%
PSPSPersekat
20%BTTS in both halves0%
PSPSPersekat
27%Scored in both halves13%
PSPSPersekat

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
PSPSPersekat
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
PSPSPersekat
80%BTTS - last 540%
PSPSPersekat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
PSPSPersekat
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
PSPSPersekat
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PSPSPersekat

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
PSPSPersekat
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
PSPSPersekat
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
PSPSPersekat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSPS is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - PSPS · 1.07 pts / match - Persekat

PSPS - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing
Persekat - half-time state
13% leading67% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.07
PSPSPersekat
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.2
PSPSPersekat
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
PSPSPersekat
1.6Average goals (1st half)0.6
PSPSPersekat
47%Clean sheet before half-time73%
PSPSPersekat
53%No goal before half-time80%
PSPSPersekat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.13
PSPSPersekat
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
PSPSPersekat
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
PSPSPersekat
2Average goals (2nd half)1.4
PSPSPersekat
27%Clean sheet after half-time47%
PSPSPersekat
47%No goal after half-time47%
PSPSPersekat

PSPS - second-half results

33% W20% R47% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persekat - second-half results

27% W33% R40% P
16
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding208%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Persekat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.21.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSPS
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
4
31-45
5
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Persekat
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
5
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+79%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
174%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Persekat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSPSLigaPersekat
Average goals in match 3.602.62 2.00
Both teams scored 60%47% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%45% 33%
Clean sheets 20%29% 40%
Goal before half-time 60%68% 40%
Goal after half-time 93%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSPSYellow cardBrandon Marsel Scheunemann
  2. PersekatYellow cardAndik Rendika Rama
  3. PersekatYellow cardIuri Barbosa da Silva
  4. PersekatSubstitutionOn: Arsyad YusgiantoroOff: Moch Kevy Syahertian
  5. PSPSSubstitutionOn: Nugroho SantosoOff: Misbakus Solikin
  6. PersekatSubstitutionOn: Kaio Lucas Nunes SantosOff: Andik Rendika Rama

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PSPS 1 - 0 - 0 Persekat. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Persekat
2 : 3
PSPS

FAQ

What was the result of PSPS vs Persekat?

The Liga 2 match finished PSPS 2:0 Persekat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSPS vs Persekat?

PSPS score 1.60 goals per game on average and Persekat 0.73. The Liga 2 average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 60% of PSPS's matches and 33% of Persekat's.

What form are PSPS and Persekat in?

Over the last 5 games PSPS have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persekat 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSPS vs Persekat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.