Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC: match statistics

PSS Sleman crest
PSS Sleman
2 : 2half-time 0:2
Garudayaksa FC crest
Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSS Sleman play Garudayaksa FC in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

PSS Sleman: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Garudayaksa FC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSS Sleman scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Garudayaksa FC scores 1.82 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSS Sleman 61%, Garudayaksa FC 46%. Over 2.5: PSS Sleman 57%, Garudayaksa FC 43%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Garudayaksa FC has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.32. PSS Sleman: 10.2 shots per match, Garudayaksa FC: 10.4.

Match halves

PSS Sleman: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.25. Garudayaksa FC: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

PSS Sleman: 46-60 (14 goals). Garudayaksa FC: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

PSS Sleman holds a clear attacking edge at home: in home matches they average 2.36 goals per game and have 54 goals this season (14 in the last 5), while Garudayaksa FC score only 1.15 goals away on average and have 49 goals this season (9 in the last 5). The hosts also create better chances — averaging 5.36 shots on target and 11.5 attempts per home game with a 20% conversion rate, versus 4.7 shots on target, 11.1 attempts and 10% efficiency for the visitors, which suggests more high-quality opportunities for PSS. Defensively both teams are solid: PSS concede 0.5 goals per home game on average with xG against 0.75 and xG for 1.53, while Garudayaksa concede 0.62 goals away, have xG for 1.45 and xG against 1.32, indicating the visitors more frequently allow opponents into dangerous situations. Forms are similar: PSS in the last 5 have a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (14 goals scored), while Garudayaksa are unbeaten in their last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws) with 9 goals and slightly higher points per game (2.2 vs 2.0). Given the substantial home efficiency advantage (20% vs 10%), higher home goals average (2.36 vs 1.15) and more shots on target, I predict a PSS Sleman win; I assess probabilities at roughly 65% for the hosts, 20% draw and 15% for Garudayaksa FC.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
2Shots2
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
4Shots on target6
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.79xG0.74
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
6Corners0
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
51Dangerous attacks25
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
-1Fouls-1
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
6Cards3
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
2Goals scored / match1.82
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.75Goals conceded / match0.75
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
55%Average possession47%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
4.79Shots on target / match4.82
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.21Shots per match10.39
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
4.79Shots on target4.82
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
19.6%Shot conversion17.5%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
55%Possession47%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.32xG for1.54
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.84xG against1.15
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Shooting quality

PSS Sleman: Efficient finishingGarudayaksa FC: Counter-attacking
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
Accuracy (shots on target)47%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Garudayaksa FC is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - PSS Sleman · 2.2 pts / match - Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman
LWDWD
Season result split
57% W32% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-9-3
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-4-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Garudayaksa FC
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W39% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-3
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSS Sleman is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - PSS Sleman · 1.82 goals / match - Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman scoring profile: strong

PSS Sleman scores in 89% of matches (25 of 28 matches), while Garudayaksa FC keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 matches).

Garudayaksa FC scoring profile: strong

Garudayaksa FC scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).

56Goals scored (season)51
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
21Goals conceded (season)21
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
2.75Average goals in match2.57
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
9Goals scored (last 5)11
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal79%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
54%2 goals54%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
32%3 goals21%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
11%4 goals14%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal54%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
11%2 goals18%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0%3 goals4%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0%4 goals0%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time25%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
36%Scored in both halves36%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
60%BTTS - last 560%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Garudayaksa FC is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - PSS Sleman · 1.82 pts / match - Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman - half-time state
46% leading32% draw21% trailing
Garudayaksa FC - half-time state
46% leading43% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.82
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.89
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.29
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
75%Clean sheet before half-time71%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
50%No goal before half-time32%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.96Points per match (2nd half)1.64
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.29
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
57%Clean sheet after half-time75%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
25%No goal after half-time54%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman - second-half results

57% W25% R18% P
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Garudayaksa FC - second-half results

39% W46% R14% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PSS Sleman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Garudayaksa FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSS Sleman
ScoredConceded
9
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
12
3
31-45
14
7
46-60
7
1
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Garudayaksa FC
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
12
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
8
3
46-60
10
3
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSS Sleman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Garudayaksa FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSS SlemanLigaGarudayaksa FC
Average goals in match 2.752.79 2.57
Both teams scored 61%51% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%49% 43%
Clean sheets 36%28% 46%
Goal before half-time 71%70% 71%
Goal after half-time 89%79% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?

The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 2:2 Garudayaksa FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?

PSS Sleman score 2.00 goals per game on average and Garudayaksa FC 1.82. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 61% of PSS Sleman's matches and 46% of Garudayaksa FC's.

What form are PSS Sleman and Garudayaksa FC in?

Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Garudayaksa FC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.