Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 06 September 2026

PSS Sleman vs Persipal: match statistics

PSS Sleman crest
PSS Sleman
7 : 0half-time 4:0
Persipal crest
Persipal

PSS Sleman vs Persipal: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSS Sleman played Persipal in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 7:0.

Current form

PSS Sleman: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Persipal: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSS Sleman scores 1.82 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Persipal scores 0.59 and concedes 2.68. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSS Sleman 64%, Persipal 50%. Over 2.5: PSS Sleman 55%, Persipal 64%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

PSS Sleman has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.10. PSS Sleman: 10.3 shots per match, Persipal: 8.0.

Match halves

PSS Sleman: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.14. Persipal: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

PSS Sleman: 76-90+ (11 goals). Persipal: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSS Sleman, as the league leader, shows dominant home form: 73% home wins, 0% home defeats, and on average 1.82 goals scored and 0.55 conceded per match, yielding a +14 goal difference in home games. Persipal has severe away problems: 0% away wins, 91% away defeats, an average of 0.45 goals scored and 3.36 conceded per away match, and an away goal difference of -32. In the last 5 matches PSS scored 7 and conceded 2, translating to an average of 2.2 points per match, while Persipal scored 4 and conceded 18, giving them 0.2 points per match. In terms of chance quality the hosts have average home xG of 1.43 versus visitors’ away xG of 0.85, 4.91 shots on target for PSS versus 2.64 for Persipal, and a conversion rate of 18% vs 7%, all favoring the hosts in chance creation and finishing. Considering these discrepancies in attack and defense (1.82/0.55 vs 0.45/3.36), Persipal’s lack of away wins and superior xG metrics for the hosts, I forecast a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS at 68% vs 32% because several strong data signals favor both teams scoring. The hosts have a seasonal BTTS rate of 64% and have scored 40 goals this season, while Persipal have conceded 59 goals this season and have 0% clean sheets, suggesting PSS Sleman has a realistic chance to score. The visitors have an 80% BTTS rate in their last 5 matches and conceded a total of 18 goals in those games (3.6 per match on average), and their seasonal goals conceded average is 3.36, which significantly increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. PSS generates more chances: xG 1.36 vs 0.85 for Persipal, averaging 10.8 shots and 4.5 on target vs 6.18 and 2.64 for the opponents; although Persipal’s average goals scored are modest (0.45 for the season and 0.8 in the last 5), they still find the net frequently enough. Considering the hosts’ seasonal BTTS 64%, the visitors’ 80% BTTS in the last 5, Persipal’s high goals conceded (59 this season, 3.6 average in the last 5) and PSS’s advantage in chance creation, I select BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG, I expect about 1.70 goals for PSS Sleman (attacking xG 1.36 vs opponents’ xG conceded 2.03) and 1.31 for Persipal (attacking xG 0.85 vs hosts’ xG conceded 1.77), totaling ~3.01 expected goals. Season percentages show a strong signal for Over 1.5: PSS has 82% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Persipal 100%, while Over 2.5 occurred this season in 55% and 73% of matches respectively. In the last 5 games PSS scored 7 and conceded 2 (avg 1.4 scored, 0.4 conceded), whereas Persipal scored 4 and conceded 18 (avg 0.8 scored, 3.6 conceded), which significantly weakens their defense. Additionally PSS averages 10.8 shots with 4.5 on target, and Persipal 6.18 with 2.64 on target with conversion ~7% for both, supporting a higher number of goal-scoring situations; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (~90% probability), while Over 2.5 is also relevant (~68%) due to the sum xG ~3.01 and Persipal’s poor defense (seasonal 3.36 conceded, 18 conceded in the last 5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates a home advantage: PSS Sleman xG is 1.36 versus Persipal 0.85, and average shots 10.8 vs 6.18 with shots on target 4.5 vs 2.64 confirm superior chance creation (xG difference +0.51 and on average +4.62 shots). In the last 5 matches PSS form is W W D W D (60% wins), while Persipal is L L D L L (0% wins and 80% defeats), and the visitors concede on average 3.36 goals per match this season. At half-time a draw is most common: the home side records a half-time draw in 55% of season matches and 60% in the last 5, so we estimate about a 58% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break the hosts are more active — PSS scores on average 1.0 goal in second halves in the last 5 matches, while Persipal concedes on average 2.6 goals in second halves over that period, therefore the most reliable signal is a half-time draw and a home win (X/1). Additionally, Persipal’s poor away efficiency (seasonal 0% away wins and 91% defeats for visitors) reduces the realistic chances of an away victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

4 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
PSS SlemanPersipal
20Shots5
PSS SlemanPersipal
11Shots on target3
PSS SlemanPersipal
2.54xG0.63
PSS SlemanPersipal
8Corners2
PSS SlemanPersipal
71Dangerous attacks15
PSS SlemanPersipal
-1Fouls-1
PSS SlemanPersipal
0Cards1
PSS SlemanPersipal

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSS SlemanPersipal
1.82Goals scored / match0.59
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.73Goals conceded / match2.68
PSS SlemanPersipal
54%Average possession44%
PSS SlemanPersipal
4.82Shots on target / match3.32
PSS SlemanPersipal

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.32Shots per match7.95
PSS SlemanPersipal
4.82Shots on target3.32
PSS SlemanPersipal
17.6%Shot conversion7.4%
PSS SlemanPersipal
54%Possession44%
PSS SlemanPersipal
1.32xG for1.1
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.9xG against1.9
PSS SlemanPersipal

Shooting quality

PSS Sleman: Efficient finishingPersipal: Balanced
PSS SlemanPersipal
Accuracy (shots on target)47%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PSS Sleman is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - PSS Sleman · 0.2 pts / match - Persipal

PSS Sleman
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
59% W32% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-2
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Persipal
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W32% R68% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-7-15
0.32 pts / match · goal difference -46
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSS Sleman is 208% better for: goals scored per match.

1.82 goals / match - PSS Sleman · 0.59 goals / match - Persipal

PSS Sleman is 267% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - PSS Sleman · 2.68 goals / match - Persipal

PSS Sleman scoring profile: very strong

PSS Sleman scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while Persipal keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 matches).

Persipal scoring profile: mixed

Persipal scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

40Goals scored (season)13
PSS SlemanPersipal
16Goals conceded (season)59
PSS SlemanPersipal
2.55Average goals in match3.27
PSS SlemanPersipal
7Goals scored (last 5)4
PSS SlemanPersipal
2Goals conceded (last 5)18
PSS SlemanPersipal

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal50%
PSS SlemanPersipal
50%2 goals9%
PSS SlemanPersipal
27%3 goals0%
PSS SlemanPersipal
9%4 goals0%
PSS SlemanPersipal

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal91%
PSS SlemanPersipal
9%2 goals73%
PSS SlemanPersipal
0%3 goals59%
PSS SlemanPersipal
0%4 goals32%
PSS SlemanPersipal

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time18%
PSS SlemanPersipal
0%BTTS in both halves5%
PSS SlemanPersipal
32%Scored in both halves9%
PSS SlemanPersipal

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
PSS SlemanPersipal
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS32%
PSS SlemanPersipal
40%BTTS - last 580%
PSS SlemanPersipal

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
PSS SlemanPersipal
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
PSS SlemanPersipal
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PSS SlemanPersipal

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PSS SlemanPersipal
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
PSS SlemanPersipal
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
PSS SlemanPersipal

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSS Sleman is 163% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / match - PSS Sleman · 0.64 pts / match - Persipal

PSS Sleman - half-time state
45% leading32% draw23% trailing
Persipal - half-time state
9% leading36% draw55% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per match (1st half)0.64
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.27
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.95Average goals (1st half)1.36
PSS SlemanPersipal
73%Clean sheet before half-time32%
PSS SlemanPersipal
50%No goal before half-time73%
PSS SlemanPersipal

After half-time (2nd half)

1.91Points per match (2nd half)0.32
PSS SlemanPersipal
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1.59
PSS SlemanPersipal
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.91
PSS SlemanPersipal
59%Clean sheet after half-time18%
PSS SlemanPersipal
27%No goal after half-time68%
PSS SlemanPersipal

PSS Sleman - second-half results

55% W27% R18% P
37
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persipal - second-half results

0% W32% R68% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-28
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSS Sleman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Persipal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.6
Average goals in match1.43.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-11
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSS Sleman
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
9
6
46-60
5
1
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Persipal
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
13
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
10
61-75
4
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -14 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.91
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSS Sleman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Persipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
175%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSS SlemanLigaPersipal
Average goals in match 2.552.66 3.27
Both teams scored 64%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%47% 64%
Clean sheets 36%30% 9%
Goal before half-time 73%68% 77%
Goal after half-time 86%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSS SlemanGoalKevin Gomes
  2. PersipalYellow cardMohammad Jordan Zamorano
  3. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Junior HaqiOff: Rico Simanjuntak
  4. PSS SlemanGoalMeru Kimura
  5. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Muhammad Salman AlfaridOff: Kevin Gomes

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PSS Sleman 2 - 0 - 0 Persipal. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

PSS Sleman
4 : 0
Persipal
Persipal
0 : 3
PSS Sleman

FAQ

What was the result of PSS Sleman vs Persipal?

The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 7:0 Persipal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSS Sleman and Persipal?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSS Sleman won 2, Persipal won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs Persipal?

PSS Sleman score 1.82 goals per game on average and Persipal 0.59. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 64% of PSS Sleman's matches and 50% of Persipal's.

What form are PSS Sleman and Persipal in?

Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Persipal 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs Persipal?

The statistical background for PSS Sleman vs Persipal — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.